Week 8 NFL Running Thread

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Chuck~Taylor said:
Oz said:
Chuck~Taylor said:
You guys are hating on Vick too much. The guy needs some receivers to throw to. They need to use him in more bootlegs as well. Now a guy who I think is a "tad" overrated is Ben Roethlisberger. Whenever he throws over 20 attempts in game, the Steelers are pretty much screwed. But he's got talent around him. He had Hines Ward, Randle El, Willie Parker, Bettis, and a great defense last year. The year before, he was throwing to Hines Ward and Plaxico Burress. If that offense can make Charlie Batch look great, then it can make anyone look great.

Falcons have three first-round picks at wideout and Pro Bowlers in Alge Crumpler and Warrick Dunn, who's dangerous out of the backfield. Just saying.
Just because they're first round picks, dosn't make them good. Just look at the Lions.
Just because they're quality, talented players with a history of success doesn't qualify them to carry Moses Vick across the River Jordan into the Promised Land
 
heyabbott said:
Chuck~Taylor said:
Oz said:
Chuck~Taylor said:
You guys are hating on Vick too much. The guy needs some receivers to throw to. They need to use him in more bootlegs as well. Now a guy who I think is a "tad" overrated is Ben Roethlisberger. Whenever he throws over 20 attempts in game, the Steelers are pretty much screwed. But he's got talent around him. He had Hines Ward, Randle El, Willie Parker, Bettis, and a great defense last year. The year before, he was throwing to Hines Ward and Plaxico Burress. If that offense can make Charlie Batch look great, then it can make anyone look great.

Falcons have three first-round picks at wideout and Pro Bowlers in Alge Crumpler and Warrick Dunn, who's dangerous out of the backfield. Just saying.
Just because they're first round picks, dosn't make them good. Just look at the Lions.
Just because they're quality, talented players with a history of success doesn't qualify them to carry Moses Vick across the River Jordan into the Promised Land
What have Michael Jenkins and Roddy White done to show that they are quality,talented receivers?

P.S. History of success?
 
Rex Grossman just threw his third touchdown to help make it 41-0 only 10 seconds before halftime. Grossman is 18 for 22 already for 202 yards and those three scores.

I knew the Bears would want to make a point after the Cardinals' meltdown, but this is pathetic.
 
A real quick fantasy question. ... If I have Bush, and he threw and INT, that counts as -2 just as a Bush passing TD would count as 6, no?

****. The Ravens are really handlind their business, even if that last TD was a terrible play by the NO defense.

The 49ers suck.
 
Junkie said:
Reggie Bush = the Michael Vick of running backs.
You can't put down Reggie Bush like that. Running Backs need more then just 10 carries a game. He's only had two games in which he carried for over 11 carries and in both of those games, he actually did pretty good(15 carries/67 yards, 13 carries 53 yards).
 
Oz said:
Chuck~Taylor said:
You guys are hating on Vick too much. The guy needs some receivers to throw to. They need to use him in more bootlegs as well. Now a guy who I think is a "tad" overrated is Ben Roethlisberger. Whenever he throws over 20 attempts in game, the Steelers are pretty much screwed. But he's got talent around him. He had Hines Ward, Randle El, Willie Parker, Bettis, and a great defense last year. The year before, he was throwing to Hines Ward and Plaxico Burress. If that offense can make Charlie Batch look great, then it can make anyone look great.

Falcons have three first-round picks at wideout and Pro Bowlers in Alge Crumpler and Warrick Dunn, who's dangerous out of the backfield. Just saying.

Also, re: Steelers quarterbacks, Maddux had one decent season, then reverted back to his normal XFL self with Ward, Burress, Bettis, etc. around him. You can't tell me that Ben's success is all based on the people around him when the guy before him failed with the same talent, prompting them to draft Ben in the first place.

I still think the only reason I appreciate what Roethlisberger did last year is because I watched every game. That's how you see how many times he got them the lead by throwing, then did nothing in stat-padding time because all the Steelers do with the lead is run.

When he sucked in the Steelers' three-game losing streak, their offense sucked. He started playing well the last two weeks and suddenly they have put 83 points on the scoreboard in two games.

Yes, Charlie Batch threw two touchdown passes last week. He also missed four open receivers, usually because he wouldn't step into a throw under pressure.

Too bad the erratic running game, crappy secondary and early-season missed opportunities are going to keep the Steelers out of the playoffs anyway.
 
Junkie said:
Chuck~Taylor said:
Junkie said:
Reggie Bush = the Michael Vick of running backs.
You can't put down Reggie Bush like that. Running Backs need more then just 10 carries a game. He's only had two games in which he carried for over 11 carries and in both of those games, he actually did pretty good(15 carries/67 yards, 13 carries 53 yards).

He's a pile of hype. He's too small to be a workhorse in the NFL and guess what? Everybody on defense is fast. He's Eric Metcalf.
So is Warrick Dunn. Listen, to be a good running back, you need your touches. It's really hard for a back to get 100 yards on just 10 carries a game.
 
When Barry Switzer said there were no Iowa States or Kansas States to schedule for Homecoming in the NFL, he never expected the creation of a team like the 2006 San Francisco 49ers.

It's Homecoming at Soldier Field today.
 
Chuck~Taylor said:
Junkie said:
Chuck~Taylor said:
Junkie said:
Reggie Bush = the Michael Vick of running backs.
You can't put down Reggie Bush like that. Running Backs need more then just 10 carries a game. He's only had two games in which he carried for over 11 carries and in both of those games, he actually did pretty good(15 carries/67 yards, 13 carries 53 yards).

He's a pile of hype. He's too small to be a workhorse in the NFL and guess what? Everybody on defense is fast. He's Eric Metcalf.
So is Warrick Dunn. Listen, to be a good running back, you need your touches. It's really hard for a back to get 100 yards on just 10 carries a game.
And Warrick is only 5'9 180. Bush is 6'0 203.
 
Chuck~Taylor said:
Junkie said:
Chuck~Taylor said:
Junkie said:
Reggie Bush = the Michael Vick of running backs.
You can't put down Reggie Bush like that. Running Backs need more then just 10 carries a game. He's only had two games in which he carried for over 11 carries and in both of those games, he actually did pretty good(15 carries/67 yards, 13 carries 53 yards).

He's a pile of hype. He's too small to be a workhorse in the NFL and guess what? Everybody on defense is fast. He's Eric Metcalf.
So is Warrick Dunn. Listen, to be a good running back, you need your touches. It's really hard for a back to get 100 yards on just 10 carries a game.
bush doesn't get more carries because he doesn't warrant any. he couldn't beat out a one-legged running back, and he averages 3 yards a carry.

and in reality, bush averages about 20 touches a game (when you consider carries, receptions and punt returns), he just doesn't do anything with them.
 
fever_dog said:
Chuck~Taylor said:
Junkie said:
Chuck~Taylor said:
Junkie said:
Reggie Bush = the Michael Vick of running backs.
You can't put down Reggie Bush like that. Running Backs need more then just 10 carries a game. He's only had two games in which he carried for over 11 carries and in both of those games, he actually did pretty good(15 carries/67 yards, 13 carries 53 yards).

He's a pile of hype. He's too small to be a workhorse in the NFL and guess what? Everybody on defense is fast. He's Eric Metcalf.
So is Warrick Dunn. Listen, to be a good running back, you need your touches. It's really hard for a back to get 100 yards on just 10 carries a game.
bush doesn't get more carries because he doesn't warrant any. he couldn't beat out a one-legged running back, and he averages 3 yards a carry.

and in reality, bush averages about 20 touches a game (when you consider carries, receptions and punt returns), he just doesn't do anything with them.
Receptions and punt returns aren't the same as carries. You need to get accustomed to your o-line during the game.
 
Chuck~Taylor said:
fever_dog said:
Chuck~Taylor said:
Junkie said:
Chuck~Taylor said:
Junkie said:
Reggie Bush = the Michael Vick of running backs.
You can't put down Reggie Bush like that. Running Backs need more then just 10 carries a game. He's only had two games in which he carried for over 11 carries and in both of those games, he actually did pretty good(15 carries/67 yards, 13 carries 53 yards).

He's a pile of hype. He's too small to be a workhorse in the NFL and guess what? Everybody on defense is fast. He's Eric Metcalf.
So is Warrick Dunn. Listen, to be a good running back, you need your touches. It's really hard for a back to get 100 yards on just 10 carries a game.
bush doesn't get more carries because he doesn't warrant any. he couldn't beat out a one-legged running back, and he averages 3 yards a carry.

and in reality, bush averages about 20 touches a game (when you consider carries, receptions and punt returns), he just doesn't do anything with them.
Receptions and punt returns aren't the same as carries. You need to get accustomed to your o-line during the game.
i am aware of that. that's why i pointed out he couldn't beat out the one-legged running back.
 
FirstDownPirates said:
Michael Vick is revolutionizing the NFL today.

You say you want a revolution, well, ya know, we all wanna change the world.
But when you talk about production, don't ya know that you can count me out?
 
Do you guys remember that song? It was kind of rock, kind of country, said something like "freedom rings through all this land?" I haven't heard that song in years, but I was trying to remember who sang it and where I could hear it again.
 
I think that song could be "If I Had A Hammer" by Pete Seeger. I could be guessing, though.

Now I've set up the "If I Had A Hammer ... I'd ..." string on here. Geez ...

QB controversy in Houston?
 
Junkie said:
Chuck~Taylor said:
Junkie said:
Reggie Bush = the Michael Vick of running backs.
You can't put down Reggie Bush like that. Running Backs need more then just 10 carries a game. He's only had two games in which he carried for over 11 carries and in both of those games, he actually did pretty good(15 carries/67 yards, 13 carries 53 yards).

He's a pile of hype. He's too small to be a workhorse in the NFL and guess what? Everybody on defense is fast. He's Eric Metcalf.
We'll see.
I think you are wrong.
But we'll see.
 
And the Iggles lose at home to the Jaguars. That makes it four losses this season, all by a touchdown or less.

I've come to wonder if Reid is overrated as a coach. His record in one-possession games is under .500, which calls into question his skills as a tactician.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top