Running NFL Week 5 thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Oz
  • Start date Start date
Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Oz

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2004
Messages
21,872
I hate to say it, but I think Whitlock was right concerning Culpepper from the get-go. He's not starting today. Harrington is ...

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2617505

... Granted, they're saying it's related to injuries, but that doesn't take away from the story.
 
Culpepper came back much too soon. It's obvious he sucks is not near 100 percent.

Oz, you like the Steelers chances tonight? I don't.

1-3 here we come! >:(
 
Good lord, I haven't been following the NFL enough this season. This amazed me:

Culpepper missed a portion of the Dolphins' practice Thursday because of the shoulder problem, which coach Nick Saban said is a cumulative effect of being sacked 21 times through the season's first four games.

Are they really ready to give up on Daunte already?
 
Trey Beamon said:
Oz, you like the Steelers chances tonight? I don't.

I actually do. Martyball blew it for the Chargers last week in Baltimore. And when you need a quarterback to make plays late, who would you rather have, Roethlisberger or Rivers? That's what I thought.

EDIT -- Anyone still not think the Bears are legit. And you can't even say, "Oh, it's the Bills," because Tennessee is beating the Colts 10-0.
 
That was nice of you, Pube, to delete your post declaring Culpepper "superior in ever way" right after Harrington started carving up the Pats. Don't worry, I saw it.

Harrington made a bad read on that interception, but he looks so much better than Dante right now, it's crazy.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
The next time my local CBS affiliate wants to understand why it is DFL in the ratings, it can take a look at its programming accumen. Instead of showing the team 3 hours up the road with the best following in the area, enough so that it has a radio affiliate here, lets watch the Bills get cornholed in Chicago. ::)
 
This is crazy, against the No. 1 rusher in the NFL, Chicago has given up 16 total yards rushing at half. Oh, and Losman has been picked off twice in throwing for just 59 yards. Bears 27, Bills 0. Wow.

After last week, I may have to start drinking the Kool-Aid even if this week it is just Buffalo.
 
Chicago is for real. They won't be losing at Soldier Field, and it'll take a hell of a good team to beat them on the road.. I'm guessing 13-3 and homefield throughout, barring injuries
 
Chicago is for real. They won't be losing at Soldier Field, and it'll take a hell of a good team to beat them on the road.. I'm guessing 13-3 and homefield throughout, barring injuries

Here's my question, in your book, is Chicago a failure if they don't win at least one playoff game? Or are they a failure if they don't make it to the Superbowl? Or do they have to win the whole thing?

I subscribe to the idea that every season is a failure unless you walk home with the biggest ring or trophy. Just interested in other's thoughts.
 
unwitty said:
Chicago is for real. They won't be losing at Soldier Field, and it'll take a hell of a good team to beat them on the road.. I'm guessing 13-3 and homefield throughout, barring injuries

Here's my question, in your book, is Chicago a failure if they don't win at least one playoff game? Or are they a failure if they don't make it to the Superbowl? Or do they have to win the whole thing?

I subscribe to the idea that every season is a failure unless you walk home with the biggest ring or trophy. Just interested in other's thoughts.

It's Week 5, dude.
 
I'm not a fan, I just have to watch them every week. Right now, they're fully capable of winning the NFC title. As far as disappointing.. I'm not really sure. I guess it'll be a disappointment if they don't win a playoff game. But they'll be fighting Philly for homefield down the stretch.
 
What the hell happened to the field in Foxboro? Was there a drag race there last night?
 
doubledown68 said:
I'm not a fan, I just have to watch them every week. Right now, they're fully capable of winning the NFC title. As far as disappointing.. I'm not really sure. I guess it'll be a disappointment if they don't win a playoff game. But they'll be fighting Philly for homefield down the stretch.

Philly? I would have said Seattle or Dallas (should they win today, like I think they will) before Philly. But that's so far down the line. With the nature of injuries in the NFL, a lot can change in one week. Let's not worry about that yet.

I'm still stunned to see Tennessee leading 13-7. The Titans were only 18-point road underdogs. (A tad much, I think.)
 
It's Week 5, dude

Dye,

Yes, I understand this. My question was meant to be more general. Not specific. Sorry to confuse.

Are teams a failure if they fail to win a title? This has always intrigued me.
 
The first game I every watched was the Bears/Pats title game, so I've been drinking the Kool-Aid since I was five.

I'm still afraid to say the Bears are good. I have a sneaking suspicion that their offense is still too shaky....

But I'm loving every minute of this season. ;D
 
Well, you knew it couldn't last ... Manning-to-Wayne from 2 yards out, Colts lead 14-13 with 5:10 to play. Also, the Vikes now lead Detroit 19-17 with three minutes to go.

I would love to see upsets in both games, but I'm not getting my hopes up.
 
Roy Williams getting hurt at the start of the game does not please the fantasy owner in me.
 
farmerjerome said:
The first game I every watched was the Bears/Pats title game, so I've been drinking the Kool-Aid since I was five.

I'm still afraid to say the Bears are good. I have a sneaking suspicion that their offense is still too shaky....

But I'm loving every minute of this season. ;D

Has there ever been a Bears team that has scored 30 or more points in three of the season's first five games?

I honestly don't know. After today, the Bears are averaging 31.2 points per game. So, much for 'Bears football.' Damn meatball Chicago fans.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top