outofplace said:
JackReacher said:
Justin_Rice said:
I suspect there are few people who watch Zimmerman play every day who think this was a massive overpay.
Really? I mean overpay is one thing. But "massive"?
This Zimmerman deal goes beyond money.
Most times that you start hearing that a deal goes "beyond money," that is not a good sign. Teams should be trying to get value in a deal, not make a statement.
Not always. Hell, I'd rather them give Zimmerman a few more bucks now than see him in a Yankees uniform a few years from now. Also sends a message that the Nats will take care of their homegrown guys. That kinda means something for the Nats since most of their homegrown talent is pretty damn good.
No Nats fan that I've talked to has one problem with the Zimmerman deal. He's the face of the franchise. Oh, and he's a pretty good baseball player, too. Whether he's worth an 6-100 or 6-90. Doesn't matter. With the way Rizzo has done business the last two years, saying Zimmerman got too much is nothing more than picking nits. The ONLY questionable thing he's done thus far is the Werth deal, and we're only in year two of that.
Let's not start acting like the Nats are just throwing around money willy nilly. OHHH. TWO 100 MILLION CONTRACTS!!!! They passed on Tex. They passed on Fielder. They've made great business decisions under Rizzo. The Zimmerman contract is one of those.