Worst No. 1 NFL draft picks?

  • Thread starter Thread starter alleyallen
  • Start date Start date
Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Do you think Rivals.com got it right with their top 10 worst No. 1 draft picks?

  • Yes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No

    Votes: 4 57.1%
  • Somewhat

    Votes: 3 42.9%

  • Total voters
    7
Double Down said:
I'm glad to see Aundray Bruce mentioned, because I don't know why he doesn't come up more often in these discussions. ESPN.com even did a list of of the 50 Biggest Busts of all time a few days ago, and he wasn't even on it. At all. He was so mediocre at defense, he was turned into a tight end near the end of his career. Nobody tried to make Ryan Leaf an outside linebacker.

My guess is Bruce isn't often mentioned b/c he didn't play a glamour position. He also somehow played 11 seasons...so even though he was a bust by most standards, he managed to stick around as a role player.

He didn't redefine the suck at QB, nor did he have multiple public blowups, nor did he retire at 26. BTW, want a laugh? Check out Ryan Leaf's wiki page before it gets cleaned up:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryan_Leaf
 
AlleyAllen said:
Appgrad05 said:
Jake Long.

Too early.

He might end up being a good pro. But at No. 1? Nah. You don't draft right tackles that high.

Really, I don't like any guys from this year's draft, at least for that No. 1 position. I was hoping Parcells would let his time lapse once or twice and move down to No. 3 or 4.
 
Appgrad05 said:
AlleyAllen said:
Appgrad05 said:
Jake Long.

Too early.

He might end up being a good pro. But at No. 1? Nah. You don't draft right tackles that high.

Really, I don't like any guys from this year's draft, at least for that No. 1 position. I was hoping Parcells would let his time lapse once or twice and move down to No. 3 or 4.

Long can play either tackle, and because this is such a muddled draft, I believe Long is the safest pick. Sure, there will be plenty of great players to emerge, but right now, it doesn't seem like there is a can't-miss-type...a title I think Long is closest to reaching.
 
Waaaay too early but I have a feeling JaMarcus Russell will move onto that list in the years to come.
 
Piotr Rasputin said:
Both Entman and Carter should be lower. They weren't busts for any reason other than their knees betraying them.

That's always the debate that comes up over this. Are they a bust because they sucked or a bust for their team because they were never healthy? I'd say a bust is a bust, because it's the team's big shot.
 
Incredibly dumb to include Vick on any draft-bust list. The guy rejuvenated a franchise and won a playoff game in Lambeau, which had last been done by a visiting team in ... never. If he had been seriously injured in a car wreck a year ago or suffered through something else that similarly would have ended his playing career as the dog fighting has appeared to do, I don't believe his name would be thrown on these lists. But the dog stuff was so egregious that now Vick's entire career is being rewritten? That's a little too much revisionist history for me.
 
I think a bust is a dude who gets every shot, and as the years go by, people say, "Man, they should never have drafted that bum."

That's a lot different than, "Oh, crap, he just kept getting hurt."

And: agree with playthrough on Vick. When his photo came up first when I saw this list earlier, I laughed. What?
 
AlleyAllen said:
Piotr Rasputin said:
Both Entman and Carter should be lower. They weren't busts for any reason other than their knees betraying them.

That's always the debate that comes up over this. Are they a bust because they sucked or a bust for their team because they were never healthy? I'd say a bust is a bust, because it's the team's big shot.

Exactly, a bust is a bust. Also, the impact on a team's salary cap has to be included. Recent picks like Carr and Couch were much more devastating to their respective franchises because of the huge sums of money dished out to them upfront.
 
Long is definitey the safest pick... If I have the No. 1 pick, I want an immediate superstar. If this guy is anything less than Orlando Pace or Walter Jones he'll be a colossal disappointment... For that kind of money he had better be a Pro Bowl left tackle immediately...

Do you think he'll be any better than Joe Thomas? I don't...
 
This one came before anybody was worrying about salary structures, but Gary Glick used to turn up on these lists. He was probably only left off of this one because he has been forgotten.
 
Mizzougrad96 said:
Long is definitey the safest pick... If I have the No. 1 pick, I want an immediate superstar. If this guy is anything less than Orlando Pace or Walter Jones he'll be a colossal disappointment... For that kind of money he had better be a Pro Bowl left tackle immediately...

Do you think he'll be any better than Joe Thomas? I don't...

I can't say he's going to be better than Thomas, but I can't say he'll be worse, either.

My point is, who is an immediate guaranteed superstar in this draft. It seems to be a deep draft, but I don't see a slam dunk.
 
outofplace said:
This one came before anybody was worrying about salary structures, but Gary Glick used to turn up on these lists. He was probably only left off of this one because he has been forgotten.

Talk about firing up the Wayback Machine.
 
AlleyAllen said:
outofplace said:
This one came before anybody was worrying about salary structures, but Gary Glick used to turn up on these lists. He was probably only left off of this one because he has been forgotten.

Talk about firing up the Wayback Machine.

Yup. I remember learning the story on some old NFL Films show. He was a bonus pick, first overall, in 1956 (Don't ask me to explain the bonus pick. I forget what the deal was.) They took him because they loved his versatility. Too bad that just meant he was below average at a whole bunch of positions.
 
micropolitan guy said:
Walt Patulski?

He was Polish, Catholic and played at Notre Dame. That's hitting the Holy Trinity if you're in the Bills' marketing department, at a time when the Bills sucked. They probably had no other choice.

They also had to pick Al Cowlings from USC the year after they picked OJ to keep him happy.

Entman's career was cut short by injuries, probably steroid-related. He was unstoppable at UDub.
One more factor: he's from upstate NY (Syracuse).

The Bills needed to fix a horrid defense that had allowed a franchise record 394 points in 1971, and Lombardi Award winner Patulski was the obvious choice. He did lead Buffalo with five sacks in his rookie year, but instantly became the second-best DE on the roster when the Bills traded for Earl Edwards the following season. He didn't suck; he just never lived up to the #1 hype. Still, you won't find much argument from Bills fans about this one.

On the other hand, we like Cousineau -- trading him to Cleveland brought the pick used to select Jim Kelly. Worth every penny of the contract he never signed.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top