dog428 said:Alright, I don't want this to come off as yet another post bashing soccer. I really don't. If you like it, you like it, and I'm perfectly happy for you. I'm not trying to change your mind or poke fun at the sport.
I'm trying to watch this World Cup stuff. I'm trying my damndest to understand it and find some enjoyment in it. But I'm just not. I can't help it.
Here are my problems:
1. It seems to me that the damn goals are too far apart. There's all this running and running and kicking and heading and running and running from one end to the other. There'll be a streak of like 45 minutes in which nobody even takes a legit shot at the goal. But if you put those goals a little closer together, make this damn thing a bit more like foosball, hey, you've got something there.
2. The clock. WTF? I've got no idea how much time is left in any game. I keep hearing these announcers talk about the 91st minute or the 93rd minute, and I'm like, that's a lot of damn minutes. But nobody ever says, "(Blank) minutes to go here, really crunch time."
3. I assume that there are actual plays drawn up by the coaches, but I swear, the only one I've been able to spot so far is kick it to guy behind you, he kicks it back, you kick it to him on the move, he kicks it ahead to downfield guy, who may or may not be onsides (I think I've just about got this little penalty figured out) and downfield guys either races for the goal or gets himself all bottled up in the corner. If he races toward the goal, he'll do one of two things: Either rocket that ***** about six rows deep or pass to some other guy who has to contort his body in an unbelievable manner to even touch the ball, much less direct it toward the goal. If the downfield guy gets stuck in the corner, he then tries to either kick it off the guy guarding him so he can set it in the corner and shoot it into a large group of players in front of the net, or he just fires it wildly somewhere out front of the goal.
4. It seems as if there's way too much luck involved. The majority of the goals I've seen scored have come from that little corner kick thing, in which the ball is just kicked in amongst a whole herd of players. Most often, nothing good happens for the kicking team, but sometimes, some guy will bob his head just right and send one sailing into the goal. Just seems like a helluva lot of luck and not much skill. (And no, I'm not saying these guys aren't skilled. I'm just talking about that particular part of the game.)
Like I said, these are my problems. I'm not trying to change anyone's mind, and as a matter of fact, I wouldn't mind someone changing mine. Obviously, a lot of people love this sport. I HAVE to be missing something.
buckweaver said:dog428 said:blah blah blah
And baseball is just a bunch of guys hitting a ball with a stick. And football is just a bunch of barbarians knocking each other senseless. Spare me. Every sport can be simplified to nothing.
Junkie said:buckweaver said:dog428 said:blah blah blah
And baseball is just a bunch of guys hitting a ball with a stick. And football is just a bunch of barbarians knocking each other senseless. Spare me. Every sport can be simplified to nothing.
That's actually a solid point. The reason I'm guessing a lot of Americans can't get into soccer is that we are such a star-gazing society. And watching soccer, unless you have a pretty well-trained eye, you can't tell who the best players are. You can be a novice and tell that Ladanian Tomlinson and Peyton Manning are better than everyone else. Same with Dwyane Wade and LeBron.
But in soccer, if you don't know much about it, you have no idea who is good and who is bad. Which is exactly why it's the sport of choice amongs parents in our "everybody wins" nation of pansies. Throw your 6-year-old out there. If they suck, nobody will know.
dog428 said:buckweaver said:dog428 said:blah blah blah
And baseball is just a bunch of guys hitting a ball with a stick. And football is just a bunch of barbarians knocking each other senseless. Spare me. Every sport can be simplified to nothing.
For the record, again: I wasn't taking a shot at soccer, wasn't trying to simplify the damn sport. I was merely pointing out the problems I've had after a few days of legitimately trying to watch and enjoy this game during another WC. Thought I made that rather clear.
It is similar in size to a football field. Sometimes entire quarters of football go by without scoring and a whole lot of punting.dog428 said:Alright, I don't want this to come off as yet another post bashing soccer. I really don't. If you like it, you like it, and I'm perfectly happy for you. I'm not trying to change your mind or poke fun at the sport.
I'm trying to watch this World Cup stuff. I'm trying my damndest to understand it and find some enjoyment in it. But I'm just not. I can't help it.
Here are my problems:
1. It seems to me that the damn goals are too far apart. There's all this running and running and kicking and heading and running and running from one end to the other. There'll be a streak of like 45 minutes in which nobody even takes a legit shot at the goal. But if you put those goals a little closer together, make this damn thing a bit more like foosball, hey, you've got something there.
Well this is easy to explain. A game has two 45-minutes halves. There will be no clock stoppage during the game. However, should play stop for an extended period of time due to injury or goal scoring, time will be added to the end of the half.2. The clock. WTF? I've got no idea how much time is left in any game. I keep hearing these announcers talk about the 91st minute or the 93rd minute, and I'm like, that's a lot of damn minutes. But nobody ever says, "(Blank) minutes to go here, really crunch time."
The only real plays drawn up involve corner kicks and dead balls. There are some overlapping runs that are written in, but much of the game is played upon the skill of the team. This is why you don't see Bruce Arena bouncing up and waving his hands like an NBA coach telling his point guard which play to run.3. I assume that there are actual plays drawn up by the coaches, but I swear, the only one I've been able to spot so far is kick it to guy behind you, he kicks it back, you kick it to him on the move, he kicks it ahead to downfield guy, who may or may not be onsides (I think I've just about got this little penalty figured out) and downfield guys either races for the goal or gets himself all bottled up in the corner. If he races toward the goal, he'll do one of two things: Either rocket that ***** about six rows deep or pass to some other guy who has to contort his body in an unbelievable manner to even touch the ball, much less direct it toward the goal. If the downfield guy gets stuck in the corner, he then tries to either kick it off the guy guarding him so he can set it in the corner and shoot it into a large group of players in front of the net, or he just fires it wildly somewhere out front of the goal.
Those corner kick goals involve skill and placement of the ball. If Landon Donovan kicks the ball to the far corner, where he knows in advance that Gooch is waiting, there will be a good chance he will get a chance to head the ball in the direction of the goal.4. It seems as if there's way too much luck involved. The majority of the goals I've seen scored have come from that little corner kick thing, in which the ball is just kicked in amongst a whole herd of players. Most often, nothing good happens for the kicking team, but sometimes, some guy will bob his head just right and send one sailing into the goal. Just seems like a helluva lot of luck and not much skill. (And no, I'm not saying these guys aren't skilled. I'm just talking about that particular part of the game.)
Like I said, these are my problems. I'm not trying to change anyone's mind, and as a matter of fact, I wouldn't mind someone changing mine. Obviously, a lot of people love this sport. I HAVE to be missing something.
I always hated to cover soccer.buckweaver said:Why? Because the World Cup is the most passionate tournament in any sport, on any level ...
Well, in order to get the chance near the goal you need the build-up. Yes, sometimes there are passes backwards, but they are to the open man who could swing the ball and switch sides on the field and then try and push forward again. You can sometimes get a different look of the defense and also present a different attack.dog428 said:Thanks for that, Crass. Helpful. Seriously.
Few things.
My problem with the field length, I think, stems from me comparing soccer to hockey. There aren't many goals scored in hockey, yet I enjoy those games because there's so much action around the nets. So, I think when I said "lack of scoring," I actually meant "lack of opportunities to score." That's what's missing. There's all this stuff happening in the middle of the field with no real chance to score. And all of that stuff makes it terribly uninteresting to me.
There is an official time-keeper, but the referee can add or subtract as much or as little as he likes. As the 45th or 90th minute is expiring, someone on the sideline holds up a big sign that says the amount of extra time. The commentators generally repeat it and show a graphic that blocks half the screen so that you can't see the play.The clock thing: So, when this time is lost, is there a second clock somewhere that tells you how much extra time you'll have at the end? Surely, everyone isn't just guessing about the extra time up until the point it pops up on the clock, right?
Well done!Offsides: I'll be damned, I was right. Ha. Small victory for me.
Sometimes it is. That is often the case in a scrum-like situation. However, there are lots of times where the individual taking the corner kick places it in the exact spot for someone to score.Corner kicks: Obviously, kicking that ball right where they want to is skillfull. But I was more talking about the actual goal scoring. Just seems awfully lucky most of the time. But that's a problem way down the list for me. Actually, scratch this one off. Doesn't belong. If they're scoring, I don't give a damn how it's happening.