Gator
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2005
- Messages
- 2,785
Patriots fans can learn from Federer.
We do not dislike dominance. We dislike the way it handles itself sometimes.
And how is that?
Patriots fans can learn from Federer.
We do not dislike dominance. We dislike the way it handles itself sometimes.
People generally appreciate champions who win with class.
They tend to look unfavorably among champions who always seem to have a chip on their shoulder about one thing or another. And who engage in skullduggery.
One of those applies to Federer. The other applies to the Patriots. I'll leave it to everyone else to figure out which goes with which.
To be fair, it's not hard to find obnoxious Fed fans online. I don't think it's apples to apples to compare certain Pats fans to Federer himself.
Williams was asked about Sharapova’s book, which was published last year. It contains quite a bit of material about the American, including a reference to Williams crying in the locker room after losing to Sharapova in the Wimbledon final 14 years ago.
“As a fan, I wanted to read the book, and I was really excited for it to come out, and I was really happy for her. And then the book was a lot about me. I was surprised about that, to be honest,” Williams said. “I was, like, ‘Oh, OK, I didn’t expect to be reading a book about me – that wasn’t necessarily true.’”
That's really too bad, but she's getting to the age where injury problems become more frequent and harder to recover from.Serena withdraws today, citing pectoral muscle injury. Might not be back for Wimbledon.
It means her PEDs are better than theirs?
I realize that winning any tennis major is difficult, but at this point, does it make sense that people shrug when Nadal wins the French? Even so, winning six Slams outside of your best surface (as recently as last year) is still pretty impressive. And there are clay-court specialists who never sniff his success.
Nadal breaks down as 11 French, 3 U.S., 2 Wimbledons, 1 Aussie, right? Federer is 8 Wimbledon, 6 Aussie, 5 U.S., 1 French. His distribution is more balanced and he has more. Nadal has the head-to-head, but they played a lot on clay early on, and Federer has had his number recently.
An interesting question is why the wave below Federer and Nadal never got over. The guys that will eventually push them out are guys in their late teens/early 20s. But there's a generation of guys between them and Federer who never had their moment. Both of those guys outlasted Djokovic and Murray.