MLB Trade Deadline Thread

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Status
Not open for further replies.
Simon_Cowbell said:
Dickens Cider said:
buckweaver said:
Can’t believe the Red Sox were stupid enough to give him up for what looks to be Jason Bay + prospects. Terrible move on their part — terrible move by the Dodgers, who need another outfielder like I need six kidneys -- and terrible move by the Pirates, who once again give up their best player for bums-of-the-month.

On the plus side, it does get Pierre and Jones out of the everyday lineup.
I would guess Jones and Ethier are out....

You could be right. They may want Pierre's speed in center to help cover for Ramirez. Ramirez, Kemp and Ethier would be a very weak defensive outfield, though I'm sure we'll see some of that alignment.
 
a_rosenthal said:
Angola! said:
a_rosenthal said:
Forgot they use completely different baseballs in the playoffs. I bet Bay is wishing he would have taken more BP against those playoff baseballs.

Whatever dude.

You are right. Hitting cleanup for the Pirates in a meaningless game against the Nationals on Sept. 29 is the exact same as hitting cleanup with a playoff spot on the line against the Yankees at Fenway.

I like you, but seriously, your sabermetrics **** is annoying after a bit.

Jason Bay has proven that he's a .280 hitter, who will have an OBP of around .375 and a slugging percentage of around .500. He's done that consistently (save for last year's injury-riddled season) and has even topped those numbers in the past. I think we can all agree that a .275/.370/.500 line isn't *completely* crazy, right?

So what's going to change? I mean, sure, he might go 0-5 in a game against Joba (because Joba's a ****ing stud). He also might go 2-3 with 2 walks against Joba (because Joba isn't perfect). Neither of those results will change the fact that he's a .275/.370/.500 guy.

The pressure increases, certainly, but the concept is the same: Get on base by hitting the ball as hard/far as you can or drawing a walk. Jason Bay has shown, in a fairly large sample size, that he's capable of doing that at a successful clip.

I'm not even bringing sabermetrics into the discussion, Gola.
And.... it's easier to hit in the AL.

Used to be a pretty big difference. I think the AL pitchers, by and large, are shell-shocked.
 
Simon_Cowbell said:
Hammer Pants said:
OK ... spnited, turn away ...

I have a fantasy baseball question, since I'm the commissioner in an NL-only league. Do 3-way trades technically go down as 3-way trades, or do they go down as two separate 2-team trades? I ask because the owners of Bay and LaRoche will both want Manny. If it's a 3-way, then the owner of Bay -- who plays the same position as Manny and is currently on a 25-man roster -- will get Manny. But if it's technically two separate deals, with Manny going to the Dodgers for the prospects as the first, then he goes to LaRoche's owner.
Weird league...

It's not a weird league. I only play fantasy baseball in NL-only leagues (much more fun, not just 12 All-Star teams ... and I effing hate the DH). I just forgot that the owner who loses the player to the AL gets first priority. And LaRoche is staying in the NL. The LaRoche owner was just looking for a loophole, and I had a commissionerly duty to verify.
 
Hammer Pants said:
Simon_Cowbell said:
Hammer Pants said:
OK ... spnited, turn away ...

I have a fantasy baseball question, since I'm the commissioner in an NL-only league. Do 3-way trades technically go down as 3-way trades, or do they go down as two separate 2-team trades? I ask because the owners of Bay and LaRoche will both want Manny. If it's a 3-way, then the owner of Bay -- who plays the same position as Manny and is currently on a 25-man roster -- will get Manny. But if it's technically two separate deals, with Manny going to the Dodgers for the prospects as the first, then he goes to LaRoche's owner.
Weird league...

It's not a weird league. I only play fantasy baseball in NL-only leagues (much more fun, not just 12 All-Star teams ... and I effing hate the DH). I just forgot that the owner who loses the player to the AL gets first priority. And LaRoche is staying in the NL. The LaRoche owner was just looking for a loophole, and I had a commissionerly duty to verify.
I'm in an NL league too.

Carry 23 players with a $260 auction-day cap. Must protect between 8 and 13 players headed into the auction. Can give raises to extend contracts.

But to allow someone to cherry-pick Manny Ramirez because they had Andy ****ing LaRoche.... well, that's criminal.
 
Simon_Cowbell said:
Hammer Pants said:
Simon_Cowbell said:
Hammer Pants said:
OK ... spnited, turn away ...

I have a fantasy baseball question, since I'm the commissioner in an NL-only league. Do 3-way trades technically go down as 3-way trades, or do they go down as two separate 2-team trades? I ask because the owners of Bay and LaRoche will both want Manny. If it's a 3-way, then the owner of Bay -- who plays the same position as Manny and is currently on a 25-man roster -- will get Manny. But if it's technically two separate deals, with Manny going to the Dodgers for the prospects as the first, then he goes to LaRoche's owner.
Weird league...

It's not a weird league. I only play fantasy baseball in NL-only leagues (much more fun, not just 12 All-Star teams ... and I effing hate the DH). I just forgot that the owner who loses the player to the AL gets first priority. And LaRoche is staying in the NL. The LaRoche owner was just looking for a loophole, and I had a commissionerly duty to verify.
I'm in an NL league too.

Carry 23 players with a $260 auction-day cap. Must protect between 8 and 13 players headed into the auction. Can give raises to extend contracts.

But to allow someone to cherry-pick Manny Ramirez because they had Andy ****ing LaRoche.... well, that's criminal.

He didn't allow that. Ramirez is going to the guy who lost Bay.
 
outofplace said:
Simon_Cowbell said:
Hammer Pants said:
Simon_Cowbell said:
Hammer Pants said:
OK ... spnited, turn away ...

I have a fantasy baseball question, since I'm the commissioner in an NL-only league. Do 3-way trades technically go down as 3-way trades, or do they go down as two separate 2-team trades? I ask because the owners of Bay and LaRoche will both want Manny. If it's a 3-way, then the owner of Bay -- who plays the same position as Manny and is currently on a 25-man roster -- will get Manny. But if it's technically two separate deals, with Manny going to the Dodgers for the prospects as the first, then he goes to LaRoche's owner.
Weird league...

It's not a weird league. I only play fantasy baseball in NL-only leagues (much more fun, not just 12 All-Star teams ... and I effing hate the DH). I just forgot that the owner who loses the player to the AL gets first priority. And LaRoche is staying in the NL. The LaRoche owner was just looking for a loophole, and I had a commissionerly duty to verify.
I'm in an NL league too.

Carry 23 players with a $260 auction-day cap. Must protect between 8 and 13 players headed into the auction. Can give raises to extend contracts.

But to allow someone to cherry-pick Manny Ramirez because they had Andy ****ing LaRoche.... well, that's criminal.

He didn't allow that. Ramirez is going to the guy who lost Bay.
Not if it was considered TWO separate trades.
 
Simon_Cowbell said:
outofplace said:
Simon_Cowbell said:
Hammer Pants said:
Simon_Cowbell said:
Hammer Pants said:
OK ... spnited, turn away ...

I have a fantasy baseball question, since I'm the commissioner in an NL-only league. Do 3-way trades technically go down as 3-way trades, or do they go down as two separate 2-team trades? I ask because the owners of Bay and LaRoche will both want Manny. If it's a 3-way, then the owner of Bay -- who plays the same position as Manny and is currently on a 25-man roster -- will get Manny. But if it's technically two separate deals, with Manny going to the Dodgers for the prospects as the first, then he goes to LaRoche's owner.
Weird league...

It's not a weird league. I only play fantasy baseball in NL-only leagues (much more fun, not just 12 All-Star teams ... and I effing hate the DH). I just forgot that the owner who loses the player to the AL gets first priority. And LaRoche is staying in the NL. The LaRoche owner was just looking for a loophole, and I had a commissionerly duty to verify.
I'm in an NL league too.

Carry 23 players with a $260 auction-day cap. Must protect between 8 and 13 players headed into the auction. Can give raises to extend contracts.

But to allow someone to cherry-pick Manny Ramirez because they had Andy ****ing LaRoche.... well, that's criminal.

He didn't allow that. Ramirez is going to the guy who lost Bay.
Not if it was considered TWO separate trades.

Rules are rules, sir.
 
Hammer Pants said:
Simon_Cowbell said:
outofplace said:
Simon_Cowbell said:
Hammer Pants said:
Simon_Cowbell said:
Hammer Pants said:
OK ... spnited, turn away ...

I have a fantasy baseball question, since I'm the commissioner in an NL-only league. Do 3-way trades technically go down as 3-way trades, or do they go down as two separate 2-team trades? I ask because the owners of Bay and LaRoche will both want Manny. If it's a 3-way, then the owner of Bay -- who plays the same position as Manny and is currently on a 25-man roster -- will get Manny. But if it's technically two separate deals, with Manny going to the Dodgers for the prospects as the first, then he goes to LaRoche's owner.
Weird league...

It's not a weird league. I only play fantasy baseball in NL-only leagues (much more fun, not just 12 All-Star teams ... and I effing hate the DH). I just forgot that the owner who loses the player to the AL gets first priority. And LaRoche is staying in the NL. The LaRoche owner was just looking for a loophole, and I had a commissionerly duty to verify.
I'm in an NL league too.

Carry 23 players with a $260 auction-day cap. Must protect between 8 and 13 players headed into the auction. Can give raises to extend contracts.

But to allow someone to cherry-pick Manny Ramirez because they had Andy ****ing LaRoche.... well, that's criminal.

He didn't allow that. Ramirez is going to the guy who lost Bay.
Not if it was considered TWO separate trades.

Rules are rules, sir.
Thus, what I posted before being disputed stands
 
bostonbred said:
Italian_Stallion said:
To those who think Manny was a cancer, I disagree. I think his antics created a nice smokescreen that kept other guys out of the spotlight.

Jason Bay is much, much better than some unproven, early-20s LF. He's an All-Star talent, one of the most underrated hitters in the league, and at 29 years old you'd think he's in the prime of his career. I'm excited to see him play. Brandon Moss will likely be a productive player for Pittsburgh like Sanchez is or like Dave Murphy is in Texas, but would be hardpressed to ever win a starting job with the Sox. I don't think Craig Hansen ever recovered from his make-or-break 2005 ML tryout and the jury's still out with him.

My only response to this part is this: Jason Bay has been to two All-Star games, things I no longer respect since the players elected Jason Varitek. Also, "one of the most underrated hitters in the league?"

Seriously?

Believe me, if this was the Yankees that did all of this, I'd be trying to talk myself into it as well, but the fact is Jason Bay isn't underrated at all, he's good. He's not Manny Ramirez.

Can the hyperbole stop?
 
Oh, and I'm tired of hearing about how Theo did the best he could considering the situation.

Instead, I'd think Theo could have sat down with Tito and John Henry (who allegedly didn't want to trade Manny for 80 cents on a dollar) and figured everything out, just like the last three years.

That would have been Theo doing the best he could have with this situation, not trading Manny.
 
Simon_Cowbell said:
a_rosenthal said:
Angola! said:
a_rosenthal said:
Forgot they use completely different baseballs in the playoffs. I bet Bay is wishing he would have taken more BP against those playoff baseballs.

Whatever dude.

You are right. Hitting cleanup for the Pirates in a meaningless game against the Nationals on Sept. 29 is the exact same as hitting cleanup with a playoff spot on the line against the Yankees at Fenway.

I like you, but seriously, your sabermetrics **** is annoying after a bit.

Jason Bay has proven that he's a .280 hitter, who will have an OBP of around .375 and a slugging percentage of around .500. He's done that consistently (save for last year's injury-riddled season) and has even topped those numbers in the past. I think we can all agree that a .275/.370/.500 line isn't *completely* crazy, right?

So what's going to change? I mean, sure, he might go 0-5 in a game against Joba (because Joba's a ****ing stud). He also might go 2-3 with 2 walks against Joba (because Joba isn't perfect). Neither of those results will change the fact that he's a .275/.370/.500 guy.

The pressure increases, certainly, but the concept is the same: Get on base by hitting the ball as hard/far as you can or drawing a walk. Jason Bay has shown, in a fairly large sample size, that he's capable of doing that at a successful clip.

I'm not even bringing sabermetrics into the discussion, Gola.
And.... it's easier to hit in the AL.

Used to be a pretty big difference. I think the AL pitchers, by and large, are shell-shocked.

I agree to a point, but as far as teams I think the AL is much better. I just think it will be a different situation for Mr. Bay, that's all.
 
Angola! said:
We've all seen plenty of players who were fan-****ing-tastic in places like Pittsburgh or Tampa or Kansas City or wherever enter a pennant race with the whole baseball world watching and suck complete ass.

Right, and there are so many examples to choose from.

Like Johnny Damon in 2001. He got traded from the Royals to Oakland, where he only hit .409 in an ALDS loss to the Yankees. That guy would never inspire a team to a World Series.

Like Jermaine Dye in 2001. He got traded from the Royals to Oakland, where he only hit .297-13-59 in 61 regular-season games and .400 in one series; he later won the 2005 World Series MVP with the White Sox, hitting .438. What a bum.

Like Aramis Ramirez in 2003. He got traded from the Bucs to Chicago, where he only hit 15 home runs in 63 regular-season games and helped the Cubs reach the NLCS and damn near the World Series. *******.

Like Carlos Beltran in 2004. He got traded from the Royals to Houston, where he only hit .435, hit eight home runs and drove in 14 runs during 12 playoff games. Awestruck, I tell you.

Those are just a few examples, but I'm sure you're right, Angola! Only players from the Yankees and Red Sox could possibly thrive in pennant races! Only they know what true playoff pressure is!
 
Oz said:
Angola! said:
We've all seen plenty of players who were fan-****ing-tastic in places like Pittsburgh or Tampa or Kansas City or wherever enter a pennant race with the whole baseball world watching and suck complete ass.

Right, and there are so many examples to choose from.

Like Johnny Damon in 2001. He got traded from the Royals to Oakland, where he only hit .409 in an ALDS loss to the Yankees. That guy would never inspire a team to a World Series.

Like Jermaine Dye in 2001. He got traded from the Royals to Oakland, where he only hit .207-13-59 in 61 regular-season games and .400 in one series; he later won the 2005 World Series MVP with the White Sox, hitting .438. What a bum.

Like Aramis Ramirez in 2003. He got traded from the Bucs to Chicago, where he only hit 15 home runs in 63 regular-season games and helped the Cubs reach the NLCS and damn near the World Series. *******.

Like Carlos Beltran in 2004. He got traded from the Royals to Houston, where he only hit .435, hit eight home runs and drove in 14 runs during 12 playoff games. Awestruck, I tell you.

Those are just a few examples, but I'm sure you're right, Angola! Only players from the Yankees and Red Sox could possibly thrive in pennant races! Only they know what true playoff pressure is!

I like Angola and Oz, and I hate to get in the middle of anything ... but damn, 'Gol, YOU JUST GOT OWNED!!!
 
Oz said:
Angola! said:
We've all seen plenty of players who were fan-****ing-tastic in places like Pittsburgh or Tampa or Kansas City or wherever enter a pennant race with the whole baseball world watching and suck complete ass.

Right, and there are so many examples to choose from.

Like Johnny Damon in 2001. He got traded from the Royals to Oakland, where he only hit .409 in an ALDS loss to the Yankees. That guy would never inspire a team to a World Series.

Like Jermaine Dye in 2001. He got traded from the Royals to Oakland, where he only hit .207-13-59 in 61 regular-season games and .400 in one series; he later won the 2005 World Series MVP with the White Sox, hitting .438. What a bum.

Like Aramis Ramirez in 2003. He got traded from the Bucs to Chicago, where he only hit 15 home runs in 63 regular-season games and helped the Cubs reach the NLCS and damn near the World Series. *******.

Like Carlos Beltran in 2004. He got traded from the Royals to Houston, where he only hit .435, hit eight home runs and drove in 14 runs during 12 playoff games. Awestruck, I tell you.

Those are just a few examples, but I'm sure you're right, Angola! Only players from the Yankees and Red Sox could possibly thrive in pennant races! Only they know what true playoff pressure is!

Well, Oz, like I was saying I never said Bay can't do it, I was just saying that he's never been in this situation before.

So, while you pointed out everyone that has done great, I could point out your Kenny Rogers and your Denny Neagle and your Eric Gagne and your Scott Sauerbeck and your countless other players who went from small market to big market and sucked ass when the pressure got hot.

So, that's why I said what I said.

No one knows how Bay will perform, but expecting him to be as good as Manny has been in the regular season AND in the playoffs is asking a bit much.

Hell, who knows.

Maybe Jason Bay will hit 1.000 in the postseason and against the Yankees and all of you small market folks will have a field day, but I'm guessing he will hit .282 and he will get ripped - or he should, because if ARod ONLY hit .282, oh god he is the biggest piece of **** in the history of baseball.
 
Oh, and Hammer thanks for your passive agressive support.

I'll remember that on the next SEC thread :).
 
Gola, what good does keeping a quitting Ramirez, as he did in 2006, do for the Red Sox in 2008? Gets them two draft picks.
 
Zeke12 said:
outofplace said:
BYH said:
Simon_Cowbell said:
BYH said:
Baseball's salary structure needs to be re-worked. After all, it's not fair the Marlins can land one of the best players on the planet as a mere rental. muahahhahahahaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!

I'll still believe this when I see it.
Man... you and your understanding of finances need to take a rest.

The Marlins would get Manny for two months, and lose a burgeoning left-handed power hitter.

Awful math.

I wasn't trying to derail this--I swear--and heaven knows there's one humorless small-market chap here who is just looking for an excuse to crap all over the thread. Psst: It's not you.

My point was that it's a pretty good indicator that baseball's working pretty well when the team with the lowest payroll in the game is thinking of making a trade like this.

All that said, I will once again believe this when I see it.

Let's recap.

The Marlins reportedly killed this deal over money. They insisted on getting $9 million from the Red Sox even though Ramirez is only owed $7 million for the rest of the season.

Ramirez is instead going to the Dodgers, a large-market franchise, because the low-revenue Marlins backed out over money.

And the low-revenue Pirates unloaded yet another quality veteran for prospects.

So, if Ramirez going to the Marlins would have been proof that the system is working, what does this turn of events mean?

Please, please tell me you're kidding.

I like how outofplace scolded me for bringing this up and trying to drag the thread down...then brought this up and tried to drag the thread down mere hours later. And, as Zeke noted, brought so little to the table you have to hope he was joking.

This says nothing about the system and everything about how the Marlins are laughing all the way to the bank and making money hand over fist as they create reasons why they can't compete with the big boys. The Red Sox were willing to pick up all of what Ramirez was owed the rest of the year--AND THE DODGERS TOOK THEM UP ON THE OFFER!!!! THE BIG MARKET DODGERS!!!!--yet the Marlins WANTED MORE MONEY!!!

What the ****? That's chutzpah on an incomprehensible level. it's not good enough to get a player who can send them deep into the playoffs. They need to make AN EXTRA $2 MILLION TOO!!! THAT'S WHY TEHY BACKED OUT...THEY WERE GETTING ONE OF THE BEST PLAYERS IN THE GAME FOR FREE, from a financial standpoint, AND THEY WANTED MORE MONEY!!!

David Samson and Jeffrey Loria do not care, one whit, about winning. They want to bleed every cent they can and don't care about anything else. they would come up with reasons why the system is broken no matter where they are. if the system is broken, why are they on their second team? If the system is broken, why are they sticking around to try and land a baseball-only stadium? So they can sell this franchise for a ****pot of money in 2013, or whenever the stadium opens.

For crying out loud, even Simon Cowbell--the board's lone Marlins fan and as fervently pro-blow-the-whole-thing-up-and-start-again as anyone on the planet--recognizes the Marlins came up with an excuse as to why they couldn't handle swimming in the deep end. They're wearing those floater things and hanging on to a kickboard and they've got lifeguards surrounding them and guess what, the deep endi s actually only four feet deep...but wait, I can't swim because I don't have my nose plugs in. Let me out of the pool.

The system is just fine. It's the Marlins who are an embarrassment. Not the system.

As for your other "points."

Manny is going to the Dodgers b/c they're so cheap they asked THE INDIANS to pay for Casey Blake's contract. It is laughable on an epic scale that you think this proves the big markets bully the little markets, because the Dodgers are in about as big a market as you'll find and Frank McCourt runs them like he's auditioning for a job with Sam Zell. The system? For crying out loud.

As for the prospects the Pirates got...do you even know anything about Hansen, Moss, Tabata, McCutchen, Ohlendorf and Karstens? Maybe Rotoworld didn't have a lot on them last week. Or do you just anonymously dub them as "prospects" because it's easier to shape your argument around the thesis that the Pirates had to sell off yet again?

Except for Tabata, they're all younger players who have done just about everything they can in the minors and need to sink or swim with a team that can afford to give them some rope and/or extended playing time. Brandon Moss is going to be better than David Murphy, who might win Rookie of the Year in the AL.

It's not like they got crap. They got experienced prospects, as much of a contradiction as that sounds, who can help them right away. And in Tabata they got a guy who still has big-time upside despite his problems. And yes: I said last week I don't think Tabata will ever pan out. but for a team that has been reluctant to invest in the amateur market, this is the best way to get a potential five-tool guy.

But maybe they're going to start investing. They got nine younger players (with LaRoche and Bryan Morris from the Dodgers) for a trio of guys at or beyond their career peak. If they're going to start over again, that's a pretty good way to do it. If they're going to ditch Bay and Nady and Marte in order to sign Pedro Alvarez...good. That's what small market teams should do. Because if it blows up in their face, it still cost them less than one year of a free agent.

I would think a Pirates fan would be happy with that. Instead, you come up with reasons why it's proof the market is screwing you. With an attitude like that, you should root for the Marlins.

I am done with responding to you on this topic, because I still can't believe I spent this much time answering one of the most flawed, passive-aggressive and antagonistic posts I've ever seen. So knock yourself out.
 
Angola! said:
So, while you pointed out everyone that has done great, I could point out your Kenny Rogers and your Denny Neagle and your Eric Gagne and your Scott Sauerbeck and your countless other players who went from small market to big market and sucked ass when the pressure got hot.

So, that's why I said what I said.

I get that, but like anything else, it goes both ways. There will be good, there will be bad, there will be average. It's never all one way or another just because a player comes from a small-market team that's out of contention. Heck, even in your examples, there are reasons for failure ...

Sauerbeck? Already had a 4.05 ERA with the Bucs in 2003, he wasn't the answer for the Red Sox.
Rogers? Actually, his stats got better with the Mets after the trade in 1999 -- he was as advertised.
Gagne? He was showing his age/red flags in the month or two before last year's deadline.
Neagle? OK, I can't explain those six miserable starts for the Braves in 1996.
 
The more I look aty this Manny deal the more I think the Red Sox just made one of the worest trades in baseball history.

They gave Manny to the Dodgers...gave him away. They are now paying one of the 3 best hitters in baseball $7 million to play for someone else for the next two months.
They also gave up Hansen (eh) and Moss.
So, for Manny ****ing Ramirez, two others players and $7 million they got Jason Bay.

You gotta be ****ing kidding me!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top