BYH
Active Member
Feel free to a.) have a mod shift this to the J board and/or b.) dismiss the followings as the ramblings of a conspiracy theorist.
But ESPN swung and missed twice this weekend re: whether or not an injured player would suit up. Tonight, it was Sal Paoalonaofdsauaouwreoasdoa-10 saying Laurence Maroney would play for the Patriots. Less than an hour later, he reported that Maroney was inactive and that Sammy Morris would start.
Yesterday, John Clayton reported the Giants' Derrick Ward would be inactive. But he played that night for the Giants.
And of course there was the whole Michael Vick thing, where ESPN's NFL reporters did not exactly cover itself in glory.
So my question: Is this just a run of bad luck by ESPN? Or are NFL sources giving ESPN wrong info on purpose with the intent of steering readers/viewers to the NFL Network and NFL.com? Is this part of the NFL's for worldwide dominance--to control the message to the point where the official version is the only one?
Thoughts?
But ESPN swung and missed twice this weekend re: whether or not an injured player would suit up. Tonight, it was Sal Paoalonaofdsauaouwreoasdoa-10 saying Laurence Maroney would play for the Patriots. Less than an hour later, he reported that Maroney was inactive and that Sammy Morris would start.
Yesterday, John Clayton reported the Giants' Derrick Ward would be inactive. But he played that night for the Giants.
And of course there was the whole Michael Vick thing, where ESPN's NFL reporters did not exactly cover itself in glory.
So my question: Is this just a run of bad luck by ESPN? Or are NFL sources giving ESPN wrong info on purpose with the intent of steering readers/viewers to the NFL Network and NFL.com? Is this part of the NFL's for worldwide dominance--to control the message to the point where the official version is the only one?
Thoughts?