S'up Type,
I would be interested to know why you think a 22 y/o female should go to jail for having consensual sex with a 17 y/o male.
First off, the age range is rarely something like you're talking about. In this case, for instance, it's 26 and 16.
But, for the sake of... whatever this is... let's say she's not a teacher and he's not a student. A 22-year-old woman would not be charged for having sex with a 17-year-old in some states. She would, however, be charged in many states, such as California, where the age of consent is 18. Your hypothetical 17-year-old would be considered a child. Society has deemed child-****ing against the law, for reasons that I don't feel like I need to defend. So, she would be breaking the law.
However, in all of the Poin cases, the woman
is a teacher and the male
is a student. Which puts her in what's legally known as a "position of trust" or a "position of authority" and the student in a "position of dependency." In which case, the student can never give consent, no matter the age. Because he might feel pressured to have sex for the sake of his grades, for instance. What you see as a "consenting teenager" is quite possibly not consenting, and will be ****ed up for life, because his teacher decided she would like to have sex with him.
Also, JESUS CHRIST, MAN, ****ING BECAUSE.