Mark2010 said:I'd take a long look at receivers, especially someone with some speed.
Mark2010 said:I'd take a long look at receivers, especially someone with some speed. They really haven't had that in a few years and it cripples the passing game.
That said, I would try to trade down for multiple players/picks.
Steak Snabler said:I don't usually get to be the d_b police, but we've had a 2013 NFL draft thread since December:
http://www.sportsjournalists.com/forum/threads/93959/
Chef2 said:Mark2010 said:I'd take a long look at receivers, especially someone with some speed.
Call 1 would be to Mike Wallace.
YGBFKM said:Chef2 said:Mark2010 said:I'd take a long look at receivers, especially someone with some speed.
Call 1 would be to Mike Wallace.
Bowe is a better option than Wallace. In fact, with Smith in the fold, Wallace is the worst option among the free-agent WRs.
nmmetsfan said:It's amazing the number of people who say the Chiefs should trade down, as if it's that easy. This isn't video game football. Of course they should trade down. Nobody is going to give up any value to trade up. Not in this draft.
nmmetsfan said:True. Yet they could have taken Rodgers and nobody would say they were "stuck" with him.
YGBFKM said:I noticed that Kiper had moved Joeckel to 5th in his post-combine rankings, but Kiper has lost his fastball.
My guess is either Joeckel or a speed-rushing DE/OL like Jones or Jordan. The recent success of those guys (Aldon Smith, Bruce Irvin) has coaches enamored with those guys.
Of course, to further hedge, Reid had a thing for DTs in Philly, so maybe they go in that direction.
I can't remember the last time the top of the draft was in such flux.