outofplace
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2005
- Messages
- 63,465
dreunc1542 said:outofplace said:dreunc1542 said:You know, I've done what oop did on this thread before, though it's been a few years because I realized that it's much better just to admit my point was wrong.
It starts out when the person makes a point in a discussion and thinks it's a solid/intelligent point. Unfortunately, there are others around who know more about the subject and prove the person wrong. That person then continues to backtrack because they'll never admit they're wrong until they boil their point down to something trite, ie: the English language is ever changing, that is so obvious as to be pointless to bring up in the first place.
You mean the point I made that Mark just conceded? That's all I was saying in the first place. That, and that I know a Linguistics professor who believes that the rule we've been discussing is a candidate for such a change because he believes it is silly and out of date.
That's the thing. Nobody proved me wrong about anything. You may think that, but that is your own failure in reading comprehension. Mark is finally starting to get it, but you are too busy being smug to follow his lead.
****ing hell. I don't know why I'm continuing forward on this fruitless endeavor.
Please explain why you felt the need to point out that English continues to change? It's ****ing banal and pointless when you're in a discussion where everyone already knows that.
Because some people cling far too tightly to English as it is now, or as they learned it as children. The really funny part was the arguments that some changes would not be logical. Ask anybody who has tried to learn English as a second language if logic applies.