The NFL makes like a newspaper

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Moderator1

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2002
Messages
32,791
and cuts staff. More than 100, this says.

http://www.ajc.com/sports/content/shared-gen/ap/General_Football_News/FBN_NFL_Layoffs.html
 
Maybe, but it's also rotten pieces of **** cutting b/c the environment makes it acceptable to do so.

As a friend just mentioned: That billion-dollar TV contract means nobody should lose his job.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
BYH said:
Maybe, but it's also rotten pieces of **** cutting b/c the environment makes it acceptable to do so.

As a friend just mentioned: That billion-dollar TV contract means nobody should lose his job.
Amen - it's a public relations stunt.
 
markvid said:
BYH said:
Maybe, but it's also rotten pieces of **** cutting b/c the environment makes it acceptable to do so.

As a friend just mentioned: That billion-dollar TV contract means nobody should lose his job.
Amen - it's a public relations stunt.

I logged on tonight to start a thread saying exactly this, but you gentlepersons beat me to it.
What bull****. The NFL doesn't want to appear fat and happy -- even though it is -- so a bunch of bottom-tier employees scraping out a living suddenly don't have jobs. There is nothing going on economically in the world of the NFL that requires this. Absolutely nothing.
Until today, I was pretty impressed by what I'd seen of Roger Goodell. Not any more.
 
I can't take credit for the doing-it-for-fun reasoning. That was brought up by Jeff Pearlman and others on the mlb.com thread.

Along those lines, I sure hope someone asks Bud and Roger why they didn't just sacrifice a million bucks to save 10 jobs.

Assholes.
 
BYH said:
Why? Because we can.

**** you too, NFL. Join mlb.com on the rot in hell list.

But hey, look at the fat contracts still being tossed around, and the jackass agents ordering their clients to ask for more to offset the expected Obama tax increase on the rich.

I haven't watched a pro anything in three weeks because of this ****.
 
There have been quiet staff cuts at individual teams as well .. wonder if the league is starting to posture/cry poor in advance of CBA talks with the union.
 
A lot of valid points being made about the CBA, PR... But basically this is just a cold bottom-line mentality at play. Revenue is up over last year, but like any business they made projections (which can be ridiculously arbitrary when you take them out of the context of a recession, because the league is still making a ton of money), didn't reach their magic $7 billion + number and decided they have to scale back $50 million and do it, in part, with people's jobs. $50 million is a boatload of money, but in the ballpark the NFL is playing, it honestly doesn't amount to that much. The party they throw for their sponsors and licensees (the only thing they give them, because they are in the business of taking, not giving) at the Super Bowl each year has to cost a couple of mil (ballpark guess). So on the one hand, there are some people at 280 Park who don't see this as anything major--although, when they make one penny less than they think they should have made it is always major. But to the 150 people who will be without work, it's going to be pretty real.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top