JC
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2007
- Messages
- 22,202
That's called an olineYeah, he looked really good against Tampa Bay. But Elliott and the running game is what really makes that team go.
That's called an olineYeah, he looked really good against Tampa Bay. But Elliott and the running game is what really makes that team go.
That's called an oline
Elliott has a lot to do with it, too. I didn't see Darren McFadden hurdlig guys down field and breaking off the kind of runs Elliott is making.
Elliott is terrific. But that offensive line ought to be co-MVPs. They just didn't help him. Tough to imagine Prescott being nearly as good without them.
I agree with you. But it's weird everyone in football keeps telling you it's the ultimate team sport and then only gives individual awards to offensive stars.It's all interrelated, which is why the idea of an MVP in professional football is kind of silly. Take away one of those three pieces and the other two don't look nearly so good.
I agree with you. But it's weird everyone in football keeps telling you it's the ultimate team sport and then only gives individual awards to offensive stars.
So there's not a single defensive player worthy of consideration?
Sean Lee has been by far the best defensive player on the team with the league's best record -- which also ranks No. 1 in the league in rushing defense.
As I recall, NFLGSIS's stats show him second in the league in total tackles and solo tackles.
Bell is the real outlier. The QBs are all bunched together. Bell is averaging more than 20 yards more per game from scrimmage than the nearest guy, David Johnson.
Steelers with Bell last year win the Super Bowl.
And Dallas also has one of the best O-lines in the NFL... Makes it easy to run and pass with you got holes and time.
It looks like the Cowboys make the playoffs without their original starting QB. Do the Falcons win 2 games with Shaub? Do the Giant win 2 games without Eli, who is not even playing very good? Green Bay without Rogers may be less than the Eagles.I don't think the Raiders make the playoffs without Carr.
My sole argument against Brady is they went 4-1 without him.
Does NE make the playoffs without Brady? I think so.
The same with Prescott/Elliott. With Romo/Elliott I think Dallas still makes the playoffs and contends. The same is true with Prescott/and whoever is backing Elliott (if he weren't playing).
Isn't Rodgers having an off year in terms of passing? I say that without looking.
I think the Falcons may or may not make the playoffs with Schaub instead of Ryan under center. But the Falcons are hardly a dominant team. Dangerous? Oh hell yes.
But I really like Carr. If they miss the 2-point conversion against New Orleans whats happens? Are still atop the division? I don't think the Raiders make the playoffs without Carr.
And yet, the voters left Sean Lee off the Pro Bowl roster.Sean Lee has been by far the best defensive player on the team with the league's best record -- which also ranks No. 1 in the league in rushing defense.
As I recall, NFLGSIS's stats show him second in the league in total tackles and solo tackles.
And yet, the voters left Sean Lee off the Pro Bowl roster.
Do the Giants have any offense at all without Beckham?It looks like the Cowboys make the playoffs without their original starting QB. Do the Falcons win 2 games with Shaub? Do the Giant win 2 games without Eli, who is not even playing very good? Green Bay without Rogers may be less than the Eagles.
Without the 1st string QB, 10 of the 12 playoff teams would have losing records