bigpern23
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2004
- Messages
- 20,711
LongTimeListener said:It's an Insider link so I can't read the whole thing, but ESPN.com has a headline that Larry Coon says the Knicks should match. So that's enough for me to believe the cap/tax issue isn't nearly as debilitating as believed, and the Knicks are using it as an excuse.
Frank Isola wrote that Mike Woodson doesn't believe Lin will be a good full-time starter in the future.
There is also a sense that head coach Mike Woodson is not sold on Lin, whose game is better suited to former coach Mike D'Antoni's system. Woodson had told friends that he thinks that Lin, a volume shooter and high-turnover point guard, is better suited as a backup.
Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/basketball/knicks/carmelo-anthony-ny-knicks-match-ridiculous-contract-rockets-offered-jeremy-lin-article-1.1114989#ixzz20zGp5ou2
As O'Connor wrote in the article I linked earlier, the Knicks could have found ways around that cap-busting third year, so yes, you're probably right that Knicks management is using the poison pill as an excuse not to match.
However, had the Knicks simply offered Lin a four-year, $24m deal before letting him test the market, they could have avoided the whole mess and had Lin locked up with a reasonable contract.
But I haven't seen anything yet that points to Carmelo as the reason the Knicks didn't re-sign Lin. I think that's just people looking for something else to blame on Anthony.