PCLoadLetter
Well-Known Member
Lugnuts said:Webster said:Lugnuts said:Double Down said:What you think about this probably depends on how you feel about correlation/causation but
Nate Silver tweeted that the the MSG stock has gone up $600 million in market capitalization since Lin's first start.
I don't follow the market and my understanding of finance is child like, but it seems silly to pretend Lin's presence didn't contribute to SOME of the renewed enthusiasm in the Knicks, which would in turn, make a difference with the financial sector, no?
It's what makes this bungling that much funnier. They could have locked him up months ago for less. But the bravado... "Jeremy Lin needs to learn a thing or two." Etc, etc.
I mean, signing Kurt Thomas? ;D. Felton? ;D
When I think of who might be involved in this..... There's only one person who could bungle something in this particular way with this kind of panache.
C'mon, who here would be surprised to read he has a hand in this?
They could not have locked him up months ago. Even after the Early Bird Rights decision, he was looking for the best deal, as is his right. He signed a deal meant to punish the Knicks if they match.
Why would he want to punish them? Because instead of working toward an extension, their attitude with him was clearly "wait-and-see."
Dolan's incompetent, and this was botched. Fans who bought season tickets expecting more Linsanity should see this as a bait-and-switch.
I think what he's saying, Lugs, is that the deal was designed to punish the Knicks, making them less likely to match. Lin isn't trying to punish the Knicks.
The deal is absurdly back-heavy -- $5M the first year, $5.2M the second year, $14.8M the third. The Rockets can use the average of those salaries against the cap for three years, but the Knicks would have to use the actual figures, giving them a massive luxury tax bill in year three. I still think they're foolish to let him go, but that's why they're doing it.