David Shuster suspended

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Simon_Cowbell said:
Fenian_Bastard said:
Really, guys, "pimping out" their daughter?
Lucianne Goldberg -- mother of Jonah -- once made a crack about Bill "finger-****ing" his daughter.
She's a crone. David Shuster is a well-regarded broadcast professional.
There is -- and ought to be -- a difference.
Pimping out is a non-graphic general comment which effectively conveys a fat cat having an underling do a dirty deed.

Give me a ****ing break.

I guarantee you if you had a daughter and someone said she was being "pimped out" you would not think it's a "general comment." It's wrong. Shuster is a highly paid journalist. He should be able to make his point without resorting to phrases like that.
 
buckweaver said:
Simon_Cowbell said:
Pimping out is a non-graphic general comment which effectively conveys a fat cat having an underling do a dirty deed.

Wrong. It is a blatant implication of prostitution.
I agree.

"The act or an instance of offering or devoting one's talent to an unworthy use."
 
DanOregon said:
MSNBC really needs to clean up its act. As all cable news nets do. But Chelsea is not 13 anymore and she is campaigning for her mom. It's her choice. I think Shuster's analysis was wrong (not the first time) and lacking in professionalism (again, not the first time), but worse things have been said on MSNBC without suspensions. Another case of NBC covering its ass. THis is NBC 2.0.
The Clintons can't have it both ways, protecting their daughter from the press while using her in the campaign and then acting shocked if anyone says anything demeaning about their adult daughter.
Romney's kids caught flak for not fighting in the Iraq War
Cheney's daughter caught flak for being gay and being Republican
Bush's kids caught flak for getting their drink on

Not from MSNBC, they didn't.
And not as crudely and stupidly as was done here.
Jesus Christ, this isn't a talk-show. There's no defense for Shuster. None.
 
Fenian_Bastard said:
Oh, this is all bull****.
For 15 years, it has been permissable -- even encouraged -- to say almost anything about the Clintons on national television. FNC aside, Matthews has been greasy and inhuman on the subject for a decade. It got so bad this year that he had to apologize and that, of course, pissed off all his manly man buddies. This comment -- is Meghan McCain being "pimped" for her father? Cate Edwards? Liz Cheney? -- is over the line, out of bounds, and under a truck. Good for MSNBC.
**** that with a hot curling iron. Billary has been pimping their daughter for 20 years. Portraying themselves as remarkable parents and their precious little child as out of bounds. Well she's grown up and a very rich and successful money changer, a child of wealth and privilege who is dragged out by the campaign to bolster Hillary's credentials as a mother.

It's not close to over the line. There is no line and NBC should be ashamed for cowering in the corner, afraid to upset the delicate lady Senator from New York/Washington/Arkansas/Illinois.
 
buckweaver said:
Simon_Cowbell said:
buckweaver said:
Simon_Cowbell said:
Pimping out is a non-graphic general comment which effectively conveys a fat cat having an underling do a dirty deed.

Wrong. It is a blatant implication of prostitution.
I agree.

"The act or an instance of offering or devoting one's talent to an unworthy use."

Don't play coy. It has a degrading sexual connotation, and you know it.
Got to agree with Simon on this one.
If it was Bill running and "pimping out Chelsea" was used, it might be one thing. Because it's Hillary, it softens the meaning.
What if it was said by Mo Dowd instead of David Shuster? Does that change the perception?
 
heyabbott said:
Fenian_Bastard said:
Oh, this is all bull****.
For 15 years, it has been permissable -- even encouraged -- to say almost anything about the Clintons on national television. FNC aside, Matthews has been greasy and inhuman on the subject for a decade. It got so bad this year that he had to apologize and that, of course, pissed off all his manly man buddies. This comment -- is Meghan McCain being "pimped" for her father? Cate Edwards? Liz Cheney? -- is over the line, out of bounds, and under a truck. Good for MSNBC.
**** that with a hot curling iron. Billary has been pimping their daughter for 20 years. Portraying themselves as remarkable parents and their precious little child as out of bounds. Well she's grown up and a very rich and successful money changer, a child of wealth and privilege who is dragged out by the campaign to bolster Hillary's credentials as a mother.

It's not close to over the line. There is no line and NBC should be ashamed for cowering in the corner, afraid to upset the delicate lady Senator from New York/Washington/Arkansas/Illinois.
Yeah, slap, and when Coulter called Edwards a "faggot," she was really saying he was a bundle of kindling.

And this is how David Shuster happens.
Because of this, right here.
Nothing the Clintons do is ever sincere enough for the brave manly men who know better.
"There is no line." Says it all.
Good, that means 'yab can one day drop the n-bomb he's so dying to drop on the Obama campaign, live, on NBC.
 
Fenian_Bastard said:
heyabbott said:
Fenian_Bastard said:
Oh, this is all bull****.
For 15 years, it has been permissable -- even encouraged -- to say almost anything about the Clintons on national television. FNC aside, Matthews has been greasy and inhuman on the subject for a decade. It got so bad this year that he had to apologize and that, of course, pissed off all his manly man buddies. This comment -- is Meghan McCain being "pimped" for her father? Cate Edwards? Liz Cheney? -- is over the line, out of bounds, and under a truck. Good for MSNBC.
**** that with a hot curling iron. Billary has been pimping their daughter for 20 years. Portraying themselves as remarkable parents and their precious little child as out of bounds. Well she's grown up and a very rich and successful money changer, a child of wealth and privilege who is dragged out by the campaign to bolster Hillary's credentials as a mother.

It's not close to over the line. There is no line and NBC should be ashamed for cowering in the corner, afraid to upset the delicate lady Senator from New York/Washington/Arkansas/Illinois.
Yeah, slap, and when Coulter called Edwards a "faggot," she was really saying he was a bundle of kindling.

And this is how David Shuster happens.
Because of this, right here.
Nothing the Clintons do is ever sincere enough for the brave manly men who know better.
"There is no line." Says it all.
Good, that means 'yab can one day drop the n-bomb he's so dying to drop on the Obama campaign, live, on NBC.
Fenian_Bastard said:
heyabbott said:
Fenian_Bastard said:
Oh, this is all bull****.
For 15 years, it has been permissable -- even encouraged -- to say almost anything about the Clintons on national television. FNC aside, Matthews has been greasy and inhuman on the subject for a decade. It got so bad this year that he had to apologize and that, of course, pissed off all his manly man buddies. This comment -- is Meghan McCain being "pimped" for her father? Cate Edwards? Liz Cheney? -- is over the line, out of bounds, and under a truck. Good for MSNBC.
**** that with a hot curling iron. Billary has been pimping their daughter for 20 years. Portraying themselves as remarkable parents and their precious little child as out of bounds. Well she's grown up and a very rich and successful money changer, a child of wealth and privilege who is dragged out by the campaign to bolster Hillary's credentials as a mother.

It's not close to over the line. There is no line and NBC should be ashamed for cowering in the corner, afraid to upset the delicate lady Senator from New York/Washington/Arkansas/Illinois.
Yeah, slap, and when Coulter called Edwards a "faggot," she was really saying he was a bundle of kindling.

And this is how David Shuster happens.
Because of this, right here.
Nothing the Clintons do is ever sincere enough for the brave manly men who know better.
"There is no line." Says it all.
Good, that means 'yab can one day drop the n-bomb he's so dying to drop on the Obama campaign, live, on NBC.
Be a man, type the word ******. For god sakes it's just a word and to let someone else define you is sad. But that's besides the point.
What Shuster said is metaphorically correct, the Clintons do, in effect, push their daughter on strangers for purposes of illiciting a response from them. This spoiled child, who has no discernible opinion on any subject, is used as a prop to feed Hillary's ego and ambition. She's using another person for her own gain, she's pimping her daughter.
 
buckweaver said:
heyabbott said:
This spoiled child, who has no discernible opinion on any subject,

Have you ever heard her speak? Do you know anything about her? Do you have any idea what she's done with her life since, oh, the age of 12? ::)
No one's heard her speak, isn't that the point? She's says vote for my Mommy like some Stepford Democrat. She's refused to comment on issues and Billary's campaigns have chastised anyone who asks for her opinion, yet they drag her out as if her existence proves their humanity.
 
Football_Bat said:
Before this thread gets locked....

Does anyone consider the possibility that Chelsea, who is almost 30 now, is campaigning for her mom of her own volition?
Of course it has.
On the other hand, how is she going to tell her mother, "no."
 
buckweaver said:
slappy4428 said:
Football_Bat said:
Before this thread gets locked....

Does anyone consider the possibility that Chelsea, who is almost 30 now, is campaigning for her mom of her own volition?
Of course it has.
On the other hand, how is she going to tell her mother, "no."


I reckon there's quite a few adult children in the world who would refuse to campaign for a parent ...
... but not one who has every right to play the "If it wasn't for us, you wouldn't have what you have today" card
 
Here's the thing. Shuster is ostensibly a "journalist." And/or an "analyst." This turn of phrase was way out of bounds on either side of the aisle in either of those roles.

(If, however, 'yab as a political operative is malign enough to use the same phrase in his next anthrax letter, that's his right. And he will enjoy or suffer whatever consequences come his way for that opinion and that language.)

But as a "journalist?" No.

You don't get say to every ****ing thing that skitters across your brainpan without rebuke.
 
buckweaver said:
slappy4428 said:
Football_Bat said:
Before this thread gets locked....

Does anyone consider the possibility that Chelsea, who is almost 30 now, is campaigning for her mom of her own volition?
Of course it has.
On the other hand, how is she going to tell her mother, "no."


I reckon there's quite a few adult children in the world who would refuse to campaign for a parent ...

I think the Giuliani spalpeens would agree.
 
A few things:

Awhile back, my mom ran for judge. My parents asked me to help. I campaigned my ass off for her... first and foremost because she was the best candidate for the job!

Does that make me a *****?

Because 'pimp' implies '*****.' Pimps aren't in charge of the girls next door. Pimps don't take a cut from the League of Young Women Lawyers.

-------------

A couple of days before this incident, I saw Shuster interviewing a Huckabee campaign official. It was the suckingest-off interview I've seen on a legit news channel (and that includes FOX, btw) in years. The "interview" consisted of the two of them praising each others' work. I had no idea. Shuster always struck me as a regular, workhorse journo-type with no particular allegiances.

David, can ya go ahead and just go to FOX and get it over with?
 
Lugnuts said:
A few things:

Awhile back, my mom ran for judge. My parents asked me to help. I campaigned my ass off for her... first and foremost because she was the best candidate for the job!

Does that make me a *****?

Because 'pimp' implies '*****.' Pimps aren't in charge of the girls next door. Pimps don't take a cut from the League of Young Women Lawyers.

-------------

A couple of days before this incident, I saw Shuster interviewing a Huckabee campaign official. It was the suckingest-off interview I've seen on a legit news channel (and that includes FOX, btw) in years. The "interview" consisted of the two of them praising each others' work. I had no idea. Shuster always struck me as a regular, workhorse journo-type with no particular allegiances.

David, can ya go ahead and just go to FOX and get it over with?
Actually, Luggie, Shuster started there.
 
Can't wait for ol' Bill's next carefully-calculated, casually-delivered public Jesse Jackson-calibre distortion/slander.

Agree Shuster was out of line in his selection of words, but HRC still loves to point fingers, when it suits her -- and hide behind Bill, when it's strategically prudent.

And more and more folks are figuring that out.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top