Bored By Beckham

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Boom_70

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2002
Messages
43,823
At least Bill Plaschke is not buying the hype:

Bored by Beckham.

If Los Angeles' newest sports star makes an impact beyond reality television shows and surreal gossip columns, I will stop using lame movie metaphors to describe him, OK?

But, for now, nothing else comes to mind.

David Beckham shows up to join the Galaxy soccer team and meet the Los Angeles media today, and I have but one thought.

Dude, where have you been?

Your final game for your Real Madrid team was nearly a month ago. Since then, the Galaxy has played four games, and won one. It will play another game before you actually take the field next weekend.

Dude, for $32.5 million, couldn't you have caught an earlier flight?

Baffled by Beckham.

One of the most publicized sports stars in the world shows up today more than six months after he agreed to the contract, and excuse me if I can't find the chills.

http://www.latimes.com/sports/columnists/la-sp-plaschke13jul13,1,5283476.column?page=1&ctrack=1&cset=true&coll=la-headlines-sports-columnists
 
One problem Bill. His contract with Real didn't expire until June 30. It was only then that he was allowed to join his new club.

He then goes on to say:

"And goodness, the media have tried to push that agenda, with everything from national magazine covers to stories on the front of our sports section that shoved good baseball stories inside.

But it turns out, we're the only folks talking loudly about this stuff."

So the 5,000 fans that showed up to see him presented, or the 250,000 pre-orders of new Galaxy shirts were a mirage in L.A.? Never happened?

How about the fact that Galaxy season tickets are at an all-time high, and that Beckham is going to be playing to a sold-out Home Depot Center for the rest of the season. How about the impact he's having on away games, for which tickets have long been sold out.

It's sad, because Plaschke is better than Mariotti in that he usually looks outside his window once in a while. It's a shame he didn't choose to look today.
 
Roga Clemens, Shaquille O'Neal(although he was actually injured). Nothing new.

P.S. Dont mean to threadjack, but I still dont understand why a great sport like soccer isnt a popular sport here in the states.
 
Plaschke is not drinking the Beckham Kool-Aid, either, huh? I seem to find more skeptics than anything regarding Mr. Posh Spice and his potential impact upon soccer as a spectator sport in America.

On a side note, one thing I always respect about Plaschke is that he doesn't just opine, he reports as well. Good insight from a wide range of folks - a soccer guy, a celeb blogger and a reporter - in this column.

Chuck~Taylor said:
P.S. Dont mean to threadjack, but I still dont understand why a great sport like soccer isnt a popular sport here in the states.
And that, C~T, is a good question. Anyone care to elaborate why soccer is on the lower rungs of the American spectator sport food chain?
 
"We won't know Beckham's true impact, obviously, until he starts playing games. But at this rate, he is going to have to bend the ball from Carson to Rancho Cucamonga to affect our landscape beyond making Galaxy season-ticket holders smile."
 
Chuck~Taylor said:
P.S. Dont mean to threadjack, but I still dont understand why a great sport like soccer isnt a popular sport here in the states.

Easy Chuck. Since soccer died off in the U.S. after WWII, the other sports had a heck of a headstart in the popularity race.

Did you know the U.S. was one of the 13 teams at the first Soccer World Cup in 1930? Or that they then played in the second tournament four years later?
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
He has some merit in there, but his lack of research into the way that sports work in a global market is sad. It is something that soccer fans have seemed to accepted since soccer, and to some extent hockey, is the only real global sport that even tries to branch into the United States.
 
GB-Hack said:
Chuck~Taylor said:
P.S. Dont mean to threadjack, but I still dont understand why a great sport like soccer isnt a popular sport here in the states.

Easy Chuck. Since soccer died off in the U.S. after WWII, the other sports had a heck of a headstart in the popularity race.

Did you know the U.S. was one of the 13 teams at the first Soccer World Cup in 1930? Or that they then played in the second tournament four years later?

Or that the Lamar Hunt US Open Cup is the oldest continually awarded trophy in American sports history?
 
cougargirl said:
Plaschke is not drinking the Beckham Kool-Aid, either, huh? I seem to find more skeptics than anything regarding Mr. Posh Spice.

On a side note, one thing I always respect about Plaschke is that he doesn't just opine, he reports as well. Good insight from a wide range of folks - a soccer guy, a celeb blogger and a reporter - in this column.

Chuck~Taylor said:
P.S. Dont mean to threadjack, but I still dont understand why a great sport like soccer isnt a popular sport here in the states.
And that, C~T, is a good question. Anyone care to elaborate why soccer is on the lower rungs of the American spectator sport food chain?

My theory CG: Soccer, like hockey, takes too much attention for the average American sports fan. Football and basketball take less attention with all the timeouts, etc.
 
MN Matt said:
He has some merit in there, but his lack of research into the way that sports work in a global market is sad. It is something that soccer fans have seemed to accepted since soccer, and to some extent hockey, is the only real global sport that even tries to branch into the United States.

It was a column- not a feature story.
 
Here's another question - why don't soccer's participatory numbers in the U.S. translate to success at the spectator level? America loves Monday Night Football and baseball is on however many stations however many times a week but millions of U.S. viewers don't seem to tune in on a weekly basis to watch broadcast soccer.
 
Boom_70 said:
"We won't know Beckham's true impact, obviously, until he starts playing games. But at this rate, he is going to have to bend the ball from Carson to Rancho Cucamonga to affect our landscape beyond making Galaxy season-ticket holders smile."

Has he looked at the MLS standings lately?

Los Angeles may be in fifth in the West right now, but they have six games in hand on clubs like Dallas right now, and five on Houston and Colorado. That's 15 possible points, with the Galaxy currently four out off a playoff berth behind Colorado.

With a team as talented as they are, now Donovan's back from international duty and others recently brought into the squad, there's no way the Galazy don't make the playoffs.
 
cougargirl said:
Here's another question - why don't soccer's participatory numbers in the U.S. translate to success at the spectator level? America loves Monday Night Football, but millions of U.S. viewers don't seem to tune in on a weekly basis to watch broadcast soccer.

Because soccer is a great game to play. And you may not get millions of viewers tuning into MLS, but you do get them tuning into the Mexican League on Univision, Telefutura and Galavision, and the plethora of other leagues that get coverage from Fox Soccer Channel, Goltv and Setanta Sports.

Soccer of any kind, with the exception being if the U.S. makes the World Cup final, is not going to touch NFL ratings in my lifetime, or even ever. But, MLS soccer on ESPN2 is currently drawing at a higher rate than the NHL was on Versus during the regular season. As far as the hierarchy of leagues are concerned, it's a much more valid comparison.
 
cougargirl said:
Here's another question - why don't soccer's participatory numbers in the U.S. translate to success at the spectator level? America loves Monday Night Football and baseball is on however many stations however many times a week but millions of U.S. viewers don't seem to tune in on a weekly basis to watch broadcast soccer.

I don't think soccer translates well onto TV. The angles that you need to make sure you don't miss a pass don't allow the cameras to zoom in close.
 
sportschick said:
cougargirl said:
Here's another question - why don't soccer's participatory numbers in the U.S. translate to success at the spectator level? America loves Monday Night Football and baseball is on however many stations however many times a week but millions of U.S. viewers don't seem to tune in on a weekly basis to watch broadcast soccer.

I don't think soccer translates well onto TV. The angles that you need to make sure you don't miss a pass don't allow the cameras to zoom in close.

That was your 12,000th post?
 
GB-Hack said:
cougargirl said:
Here's another question - why don't soccer's participatory numbers in the U.S. translate to success at the spectator level? America loves Monday Night Football, but millions of U.S. viewers don't seem to tune in on a weekly basis to watch broadcast soccer.

Because soccer is a great game to play. And you may not get millions of viewers tuning into MLS, but you do get them tuning into the Mexican League on Univision, Telefutura and Galavision, and the plethora of other leagues that get coverage from Fox Soccer Channel, Goltv and Setanta Sports.

Soccer of any kind, with the exception being if the U.S. makes the World Cup final, is not going to touch NFL ratings in my lifetime, or even ever. But, MLS soccer on ESPN2 is currently drawing at a higher rate than the NHL was on Versus during the regular season. As far as the hierarchy of leagues are concerned, it's a much more valid comparison.

The NHL on NBC would be a more valid comparison, given that Versus isn't offered by many cable providers and when it is offered, it's often only on higher tiers, unlike ESPN and ESPN2 which tend to be on basic.
 
Clever username said:
sportschick said:
cougargirl said:
Here's another question - why don't soccer's participatory numbers in the U.S. translate to success at the spectator level? America loves Monday Night Football and baseball is on however many stations however many times a week but millions of U.S. viewers don't seem to tune in on a weekly basis to watch broadcast soccer.

I don't think soccer translates well onto TV. The angles that you need to make sure you don't miss a pass don't allow the cameras to zoom in close.

That was your 12,000th post?

I don't believe in milestone posts.
 
sportschick said:
Clever username said:
sportschick said:
cougargirl said:
Here's another question - why don't soccer's participatory numbers in the U.S. translate to success at the spectator level? America loves Monday Night Football and baseball is on however many stations however many times a week but millions of U.S. viewers don't seem to tune in on a weekly basis to watch broadcast soccer.

I don't think soccer translates well onto TV. The angles that you need to make sure you don't miss a pass don't allow the cameras to zoom in close.

That was your 12,000th post?

I don't believe in milestone posts.

I don't believe in soccer, though I do think it deserves to be called football.
 
sportschick said:
GB-Hack said:
cougargirl said:
Here's another question - why don't soccer's participatory numbers in the U.S. translate to success at the spectator level? America loves Monday Night Football, but millions of U.S. viewers don't seem to tune in on a weekly basis to watch broadcast soccer.

Because soccer is a great game to play. And you may not get millions of viewers tuning into MLS, but you do get them tuning into the Mexican League on Univision, Telefutura and Galavision, and the plethora of other leagues that get coverage from Fox Soccer Channel, Goltv and Setanta Sports.

Soccer of any kind, with the exception being if the U.S. makes the World Cup final, is not going to touch NFL ratings in my lifetime, or even ever. But, MLS soccer on ESPN2 is currently drawing at a higher rate than the NHL was on Versus during the regular season. As far as the hierarchy of leagues are concerned, it's a much more valid comparison.

The NHL on NBC would be a more valid comparison, given that Versus isn't offered by many cable providers and when it is offered, it's often only on higher tiers, unlike ESPN and ESPN2 which tend to be on basic.

I have Versus, ESPN and ESPN2 in that order in a row on my basic cable.

If you want, I'll give you Telefutura/Univision's ratings for the Gold Cup against NBC's Stanley Cup.
 
You soccer apoligists amaze me. Your fervor has no bounds. Now you are clarifying a negative column. You need to take a step back and watch yoursleves.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top