2009 sj.com College Football Poll -- FINAL POLL PG 25!!!!!

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- 11/9/09 Page 19

I threw a dart for every spot from No. 15 down. I hit Annapolis instead of Philadelphia on the last throw.

1. Texas
2. Alabama
3. Florida
4. TCU
5. Boise State
6. Cincinnati
7. Georgia Tech
8. Pitt
9. LSU
10. Oklahoma State
11. Ohio State
12. Iowa
13. Utah
14. Wisconsin
15. Oregon
16. Penn State
17. Stanford
18. Houston
19. Virginia Tech
20. Clemson
21. Rutgers
22. Oregon State
22. USC
23. North Carolina
24. Boston College
25. Navy
 
Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- 11/9/09 Page 19

Only 4 teams in this week's Top 10 have played (at-the-time) ranked teams in back-to-back weeks:

No. 1 Alabama -- No. 20 Ole Miss (won 22-3) and No. 22 South Carolina (won 20-6). The Tide are easily the No. 1 team in the country. They've also beaten No. 7 Virginia Tech (34-24) and No. 9 LSU (24-15). That's 4-0 against ranked teams, allowing only an average of 12 points.

No. 7 Georgia Tech -- No. 20 Miami (lost 33-17), No. 22 North Carolina (won 24-7).

No. 9 Ohio State -- No. 11 Penn State (won 24-7) and No. 15 Iowa (won 27-24 in overtime)

No. 10 LSU -- No. 18 Georgia (won 20-13), No. 1 Florida (lost 13-3).

No. 11 Oregon played ranked teams back-to-back and won both over No. 18 Utah (31-24) and No. 6 Cal (42-3). The Ducks also smashed No. 4 USC (47-20).

Kentucky has played the No. 1 and No. 3 teams back-to-back (Florida and Alabama) and lost both by a combined 79-27.

Tennessee has played the No. 1 team twice (Alabama, Florida) and lost by a combined 25-13. The Vols also beat No. 21 South Carolina 31-13.

USC has played 5 ranked teams, winning back-to-back against No. 24 Cal (30-3) and No. 25 Notre Dame (34-27). The Trojans opened with a win at No. 8 Ohio State (18-15). But in the last 2 weeks they've been Boots'd by No. 10 Oregon (47-20) and No. 25 Stanford (55-21). USC has been in the top 25 for 128 consecutive polls but not this low (22) since being ranked No. 13 in 2002.

Oklahoma played back-to-back ranked teams, losing to Texas (16-13) and then winning at Kansas (35-13). The Sooners also lost to No. 20 BYU 14-13 in the opener.

No. 2 Florida? The defending champion with its entire starting defense back and a Heisman QB? The Gators have played one ranked team, slogging past LSU 13-3.

No. 3 Texas has played 2 ranked teams, beating the Oklahomas by a combined 57-16.

No. 4 TCU has played one ranked team, whupping BYU.

No. 5 Cincy has played one ranked team, whipping No. 21 South Florida, which is 2-2 against ranked teams this season.

No. 6 Boise opened with a 19-8 win over No. 16 Oregon but hasn't played a ranked team since.

No. 8 Pitt hasn't played a ranked team yet.



All of that said ...

The most impressive feat this season is by a team that remains out of the top 10: No. 14 Stanford, which just completed back-to-back wins against No. 7 Oregon (51-42) and No. 11 USC (55-21).

Where is the love for the Cardinal?
 
Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- 11/9/09 Page 19

Oz said:
amraeder said:
Oz said:
1. Alabama
2. Florida
3. Texas
4. Texas Christian
5. Boise State
6. Cincinnati
7. Georgia Tech
8. Pittsburgh
9. Louisiana State
10. Oregon
11. Ohio State
12. Utah
13. Brigham Young
14. Oklahoma State
15. Iowa
16. Penn State
17. Virginia Tech
18. Clemson
19. Miami, Fla.
20. Arizona
21. Stanford
22. Wisconsin
23. Southern California
24. Oregon State
25. Houston

Slightly interested in what BYU has done to deserve to be No. 13. Not really pikcing on you, OZ, just don't get, at all, any of the BYU love that's out there.
In your case, Iowa, for example has wins over your No. 16 and No. 20 teams. BYU (ranked two spots higher) doesn't have a win over any of the teams in the top 25 and got their butt kicked by one team not in your Top 25. Miami has one more loss than BYU, but it beat a Florida State team that absolutely housed BYU (in Provo), and beat your No. 7 team. Anyway, not really picking on you. I'm just flummoxed why people seem to buy into this idea that BYU is a "good" football team. Or at least a "better" mediocre than the rest of the mediocrity that finds it's home below the No. 10-ish spot. There's nothing "impressive" about their resume.

Here's my thinking -- Oklahoma, while not a great win now, actually meant something months ago with Bradford in the lineup, before mounting injuries took a toll on the Sooners. And to do it on a "neutral" field in Dallas, on the Sooners' turf to open Jerryworld, meant something. That win, to me, still compares favorably to the best Oklahoma State (Georgia), Iowa (Penn State), Penn State (Temple), Virginia Tech (Miami), Clemson (Miami) -- teams I have ranked below BYU -- have faced this season.

And say what you will about the BYU loss, but there are few teams without a baffling one this deep into the season. How did Pitt lose to N.C. State? Oklahoma State at home to Houston? Iowa at home to Northwestern? Clemson to Maryland?

So BYU has one good win (Oklahoma), one bad loss (5-5 Florida State) and another loss we saw coming (TCU). My guess is we can say that about most of the teams we rank between 12 and 25.

I guess I just don't expect a team to have two cover-your-eyes bad losses at home. Those play a big factor for me. Getting waxed out of your own building by Florida State seems like a worse loss than barely losing to Northwestern. And even if a victory over a Bradford's-healthy-for-a-half Oklahoma is better than one at Penn State, BYU has absolutely nothing else on it's resume to hang it's hat on, and I'd put victories at Penn State and over Arizona as more impressive than any two wins (Oklahoma and whatever the heck else you want) for BYU.
Just playing devil's advocate for the sake of debate...but that's my general take (using BYU and Iowa. I feel like another case could easily be made for other teams being above BYU, too).
 
Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- 11/9/09 Page 19

Oz said:
Here's my thinking -- Oklahoma, while not a great win now, actually meant something months ago with Bradford in the lineup, before mounting injuries took a toll on the Sooners. And to do it on a "neutral" field in Dallas, on the Sooners' turf to open Jerryworld, meant something. That win, to me, still compares favorably to the best Oklahoma State (Georgia), Iowa (Penn State), Penn State (Temple), Virginia Tech (Miami), Clemson (Miami) -- teams I have ranked below BYU -- have faced this season.

And say what you will about the BYU loss, but there are few teams without a baffling one this deep into the season. How did Pitt lose to N.C. State? Oklahoma State at home to Houston? Iowa at home to Northwestern? Clemson to Maryland?

So BYU has one good win (Oklahoma), one bad loss (5-5 Florida State) and another loss we saw coming (TCU). My guess is we can say that about most of the teams we rank between 12 and 25.

A 31-point home loss to anyone is not a loss we should see coming for a team you believe should be ranked 13th. When highly-ranked teams lose big, they fall big, even if it's at the No. 1 team. The Oklahoma win is good, but not as good as we thought it'd be. Most of their other wins are fine, though only beating sorry-ass New Mexico by 5 would not reflect well on a BCS conference team in the top 15.

I don't see these guys as top 15. Maybe a win over Utah at the end would convince me, but not based on the resume put forth.
 
Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- 11/9/09 Page 19

Due to circumstances beyond my control, the poll will be running late this week -- like early evening.

Those who are friends of Ms. Slappy on Facebook are encouraged to chide her for forgetting to bring her cell phone at work today.

Any inference between the two events and their relation to each other are yours not mine publicly, anyway
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- important announcement, page 21

Songbird said:
Only 4 teams in this week's Top 10 have played (at-the-time) ranked teams in back-to-back weeks:

No. 1 Alabama -- No. 20 Ole Miss (won 22-3) and No. 22 South Carolina (won 20-6). The Tide are easily the No. 1 team in the country. They've also beaten No. 7 Virginia Tech (34-24) and No. 9 LSU (24-15). That's 4-0 against ranked teams, allowing only an average of 12 points.

No. 7 Georgia Tech -- No. 20 Miami (lost 33-17), No. 22 North Carolina (won 24-7).

No. 9 Ohio State -- No. 11 Penn State (won 24-7) and No. 15 Iowa (won 27-24 in overtime)

No. 10 LSU -- No. 18 Georgia (won 20-13), No. 1 Florida (lost 13-3).

No. 11 Oregon played ranked teams back-to-back and won both over No. 18 Utah (31-24) and No. 6 Cal (42-3). The Ducks also smashed No. 4 USC (47-20).

Kentucky has played the No. 1 and No. 3 teams back-to-back (Florida and Alabama) and lost both by a combined 79-27.

Tennessee has played the No. 1 team twice (Alabama, Florida) and lost by a combined 25-13. The Vols also beat No. 21 South Carolina 31-13.

USC has played 5 ranked teams, winning back-to-back against No. 24 Cal (30-3) and No. 25 Notre Dame (34-27). The Trojans opened with a win at No. 8 Ohio State (18-15). But in the last 2 weeks they've been Boots'd by No. 10 Oregon (47-20) and No. 25 Stanford (55-21). USC has been in the top 25 for 128 consecutive polls but not this low (22) since being ranked No. 13 in 2002.

Oklahoma played back-to-back ranked teams, losing to Texas (16-13) and then winning at Kansas (35-13). The Sooners also lost to No. 20 BYU 14-13 in the opener.

No. 2 Florida? The defending champion with its entire starting defense back and a Heisman QB? The Gators have played one ranked team, slogging past LSU 13-3.

No. 3 Texas has played 2 ranked teams, beating the Oklahomas by a combined 57-16.

No. 4 TCU has played one ranked team, whupping BYU.

No. 5 Cincy has played one ranked team, whipping No. 21 South Florida, which is 2-2 against ranked teams this season.

No. 6 Boise opened with a 19-8 win over No. 16 Oregon but hasn't played a ranked team since.

No. 8 Pitt hasn't played a ranked team yet.



All of that said ...

The most impressive feat this season is by a team that remains out of the top 10: No. 14 Stanford, which just completed back-to-back wins against No. 7 Oregon (51-42) and No. 11 USC (55-21).

Where is the love for the Cardinal?

I'm confused. You mention Cincy's only victory over a ranked team as coming against South Florida, then have Pitt not playing a ranked team yet. Was South Florida not ranked when it lost to Pitt?
 
Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- important announcement, page 21

Thought it was going to be a nuking of the poll, what a relief that it's just running late.
 
Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- important announcement, page 21

No... but I wouldn't expect a story tonight... just the poll for the firsttime in 3 years...
 
Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- important announcement, page 21

oop, according to yahoo, south florida wasn't ranked at the time. yahoo puts where the teams were ranked when they played; nice littlle feature.
 
Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- important announcement, page 21

the poll's no fun without the story. I'll wait for the story.
 
Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- important announcement, page 21

Songbird said:
oop, according to yahoo, south florida wasn't ranked at the time. yahoo puts where the teams were ranked when they played; nice littlle feature.

South Florida was ranked No. 21 at the time, according to the schedule on ESPN.
 
Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- important announcement, page 21

joe_schmoe said:
the poll's no fun without the story. I'll wait for the story.
That might come tomorrow... am tabulating the results after a ballbuster of a day...
 
Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- Nov. 16, 2009 -- Page 21

Dear Pollsters,
I owe you one story cause I got busy today.
Signed
Slappy.

SportsJournalists.com COLLEGE FOOTBALL POLL
11/16/2009
RK. TEAM (1st) PTS Last

1. Florida (16) 794 1
2. Texas (7) 783 2
3. Alabama (8 ) 780 3
4. TCU (2) 727 4
5. Cincinnati 683 5
6. Boise State 677 6
7. Georgia Tech 619 7
8. Pitt 554 8
9. LSU 545 10
10. Ohio State 543 9
11. Oregon 497 16
12. Oklahoma St. 426 17
13. Stanford 350 NR
14. Penn State 344 19
15. Iowa 328 15
16. Wisconsin 280 22
17. Virginia Tech 274 20
18. Utah 218 11
19. Clemson 207 25
20. Brigham Young 186 21
21. Miami (Fla.) 164 12
22. Oregon St. 156 NR
23. USC 134 14
24. Houston 98 13
T25. Rutgers 65 NR
T25. N. Carolina 65 NR

Also receiving votes: Navy 56, Arizona 37, Mississippi 33, Nebraska 33, Temple 19, Central Michigan 14, Auburn 12, West Virginia 11, Cal 5, S. Florida 4, Boston College 3, Troy 2.


The SportsJournalists.com college football poll committee: Slappy4428 (chairman), 2muchcoffeeman, Agate Page, Azom, Bubbler BYH, Della9250, Dparker85, Elliotte Friedman, GB-Hack, Hammer Pants, Hank Scorpio, Huggy, Ishouldcoco, Jesus Muscatel, Joe Schmoe, KYsportswriter, Layman, Madhavok, Matt1735, Orville Redenbacher, Oz, Piotr Rasputin, Popedirkbenedict, Precious Roy, Red Smith Clone, Rumpleforeskin, spnited, Starman, Stormsurge, Sxysptswrtr,Trooper Bari, WS, Songbird.
 
Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- Page 21, 11/16/09

KYSportsWriter said:
Songbird said:
oop, according to yahoo, south florida wasn't ranked at the time. yahoo puts where the teams were ranked when they played; nice littlle feature.

South Florida was ranked No. 21 at the time, according to the schedule on ESPN.

I thought they were ranked at the time, too. I don't think they dropped completely out until after the loss to Rutgers.
 
Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- Page 21, 11/16/09

Interesting note about the top 10 in our poll:

LSU struggled to beat a lower-division WAC team at home, and moved up from No. 10 to No. 9.

Ohio State beat the team it was tied with for the Big 10 lead to claim a Rose Bowl berth, and the Buckeyes fall from No. 9 to No. 10.
 
Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- Page 21, 11/16/09

I Should Coco said:
Interesting note about the top 10 in our poll:

LSU struggled to beat a lower-division WAC team at home, and moved up from No. 10 to No. 9.

Ohio State beat the team it was tied with for the Big 10 lead to claim a Rose Bowl berth, and the Buckeyes fall from No. 9 to No. 10.

Not my fault. They swapped spots on my ballot (tOSU 11-> 9, LSU 9 -> 11), with former #10 USC heading down to 23rd.
 
Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- Page 21, 11/16/09

outofplace said:
KYSportsWriter said:
Songbird said:
oop, according to yahoo, south florida wasn't ranked at the time. yahoo puts where the teams were ranked when they played; nice littlle feature.

South Florida was ranked No. 21 at the time, according to the schedule on ESPN.

I thought they were ranked at the time, too. I don't think they dropped completely out until after the loss to Rutgers.

Doesn't ESPN have its own poll? ESPN/USA Today?

Yahoo uses AP rankings in its standings.

Might explain the difference.
 
Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- Page 21, 11/16/09

Songbird said:
outofplace said:
KYSportsWriter said:
Songbird said:
oop, according to yahoo, south florida wasn't ranked at the time. yahoo puts where the teams were ranked when they played; nice littlle feature.

South Florida was ranked No. 21 at the time, according to the schedule on ESPN.

I thought they were ranked at the time, too. I don't think they dropped completely out until after the loss to Rutgers.

Doesn't ESPN have its own poll? ESPN/USA Today?

Yahoo uses AP rankings in its standings.

Might explain the difference.

Possible. Bottom line is both beat USF when people though USF was good.
 
Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- Page 21, 11/16/09

Songbird said:
outofplace said:
KYSportsWriter said:
Songbird said:
oop, according to yahoo, south florida wasn't ranked at the time. yahoo puts where the teams were ranked when they played; nice littlle feature.

South Florida was ranked No. 21 at the time, according to the schedule on ESPN.

I thought they were ranked at the time, too. I don't think they dropped completely out until after the loss to Rutgers.

Doesn't ESPN have its own poll? ESPN/USA Today?

Yahoo uses AP rankings in its standings.

Might explain the difference.

USF was ranked No. 21 in the Week 6 AP poll, before falling out after the loss to Cincy.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top