BitterYoungMatador2
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2005
- Messages
- 21,369
1960 Pirates over the Yankees
Montana isn't moving up unless Bozeman is part of the package, and for some reason the people behind the second-rate FBS conferences don't want Bozeman (they cite the stadium, which is about the size of Montana's stadium so I don't understand the problem).I don’t blame the Dakota and Montana schools for not moving up though. For one thing they are all together at that level. For another, population limits will never let them scratch out consistent success in FBS the way the former SoCon schools have, to name one example.
Me neither. They are successful and happy right where they are.I don’t blame the Dakota and Montana schools for not moving up though. For one thing they are all together at that level. For another, population limits will never let them scratch out consistent success in FBS the way the former SoCon schools have, to name one example.
Can’t speak for the Montana schools, but North Dakota State would stab several hobos to move up to FBS if given the chance. South Dakota State, which rebuilt its stadium from dump to gem in the 2010s, would likely follow them. The Dakota schools have some serious financial benefactors, particularly the Sanford health organization.I don’t blame the Dakota and Montana schools for not moving up though. For one thing they are all together at that level. For another, population limits will never let them scratch out consistent success in FBS the way the former SoCon schools have, to name one example.
Agreed. Part of the problem is that the games are over and the coaching changes are over. Not as much to lampoon.That may be the dullest SEC Shorts I can remember. Maybe I’m just burned out at the end.
Unless they have been invited to join an FBS conference, the NCAA will deny their bid to move up. They set this precedent with Sacramento State this past offseason. No invitation, no move.If the Dakota schools not invited by a conference and move up anyway . . . who's on their schedule?
Lot of road games. With nice guarantees. Home games against D-II teams.My hypothetical was based on the NCAA losing in court (or allowing it for fear of losing in court).
Had Sacramento State been allowed to move up without a conference invitation, who would they have played?
That’s one reason why they’d need partners. Montana, Montana State, Illinois State, Youngstown State, probably Northern Iowa, maybe Southern Illinois, the other two Dakota schools could plausibly do it, though their indoor stadia are small. There are others.If the Dakota schools not invited by a conference and move up anyway . . . who's on their schedule?
PAC-12 schools will only have seven league games and the Mountain West only eight. Lots of vacancies off the bat there. UConn is also an independent needing to fill out games so that’s a natural fit. MAC schools would be willing to go home-and-home. And as long as it counts as an FBS win, lots of big schools will be happy to stick them in the body bag rotation.If the Dakota schools not invited by a conference and move up anyway . . . who's on their schedule?
Pun intended?The only reason Liberty was allowed to move up was because they were prepared to sue the bejesus out of the NCAA and the NCAA blinked.
The only reason Liberty was allowed to move up was because they were prepared to sue the bejesus out of the NCAA and the N