2009 sj.com College Football Poll -- FINAL POLL PG 25!!!!!

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- 10/5/2009 Page 13

Bubbler said:
You're just mad because Ball State will get its first win over Eastern Michigan!

Damnit Bubbs, can't you keep your MAC fanbois straight?


And when the Cardinals lose to the mighty Beagles, they might as well just fold it up and go Division I-AA.
 
Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- 10/5/2009 Page 13

1, Florida
2, Alabama
3, Texas
4, Virginia Tech
5, USC
6, Texas Christian
7, Boise State
8, Cincinnati
9, Iowa
10, Louisiana State
11, Ohio State
12, Oregon
13, South Florida
14, Miami
15, Oklahoma
16, Kansas
17, Penn State
18, Georgia Tech
19, Oklahoma State
20, Brigham Young
21, Pittsburgh
22, Notre Dame
23, West Virginia
24, Nebraska
25, Central Michigan

I rarely do it, but I jumped Alabama over Texas. Tide's win against a resurgent Virginia Tech team is better than any Texas win so far.

And Central Michigan debuts. Chipps lost to Arizona (19-6) of the Pac-10 but beat the team (Michigan State) that beat the team (Michigan) that was unbeaten at the time. And I think CM could beat any other candidate for No. 25 (Wisconsin or Stanford or Ole Miss or Mizzou or Michigan or Utah), so why not?
 
Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- 10/5/2009 Page 13

I thought about switching Bama and Texas but decided not to because neither win was that impressive. That may not be a good reason to some ... oh well.
 
Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- 10/5/2009 Page 13

Oz said:
For weeks, I've had this feeling that Alabama -- not Florida -- was the best team in the country. Today, after watching both on CBS, I'm finally going to act on it. If I believe 'Bama would win today head-to-head at a neutral site, then I probably ought to rank them as such.

I know it seems like odd timing given how the Gators just handed LSU a rare prime-time loss in Death Valley, but I just like the Crimson Tide.

1. Alabama
2. Florida
3. Texas
4. Virginia Tech
5. Boise State
6. Texas Christian
7. Iowa (up 5)
8. Southern California
9. Ohio State
10. Miami, Fla.
11. Cincinnati
12. Louisiana State (down eight)
13. Nebraska
14. Oregon
15. Kansas
16. South Florida
17. Penn State
18. Brigham Young
19. Georgia Tech
20. Oklahoma State (down 4)
21. Utah (replacing No. 18 Ole Miss)
22. Oklahoma
23. Auburn
24. West Virginia
25. Houston (replacing No. 22 Wisconsin)

Bama was not impressive last night -- at least on offense. Defense was solid, but also exposed Jevan Snead as a fraud Qb of a fraud team not seen since the days of Darrell Bevell.
And Bama's offense was horrid. McElroy was like the second coming of John Parker Wilson...
I think if the two teams played as they did on Saturday, Florida would beat Bama soundly. Having said that, I also think Bama didn't play like it has this season.
 
Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- 10/5/2009 Page 13

slappy4428 said:
Oz said:
For weeks, I've had this feeling that Alabama -- not Florida -- was the best team in the country. Today, after watching both on CBS, I'm finally going to act on it. If I believe 'Bama would win today head-to-head at a neutral site, then I probably ought to rank them as such.

I know it seems like odd timing given how the Gators just handed LSU a rare prime-time loss in Death Valley, but I just like the Crimson Tide.

Bama was not impressive last night -- at least on offense. Defense was solid, but also exposed Jevan Snead as a fraud Qb of a fraud team not seen since the days of Darrell Bevell.
And Bama's offense was horrid. McElroy was like the second coming of John Parker Wilson...
I think if the two teams played as they did on Saturday, Florida would beat Bama soundly. Having said that, I also think Bama didn't play like it has this season.

Trust me, I didn't strictly base it on Saturday's games. I thought about it weeks ago but couldn't bring myself to do it.

The Gators scored a touchdown Saturday only when the refs missed a blatant offensive pass interference. If that's called, they might not have scored a touchdown all night and won 6-3. Tebow did a nice job managing the game and letting the defense carry them, but if they both played like they did Saturday, I would have more confidence in the Tide winning that game.
 
Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- 10/5/2009 Page 13

Florida babying Tebow against a tough defense, knowing it didn't need to score much, because LSU's offense is no match for Florida's defense. If Bama were the opponent, Tebow would have gone all out or not played at all, and the Gators would have taken it up a few notches.

Bama is No. 2 in my book, but not quite in Florida's class.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- 10/5/2009 Page 13

Maybe not. But Bama was 15 minutes away from winning the SEC championship and playing for a national championship. The Tide weren't too far from the Gators' class when the season began, and somewhere along the way, I felt they joined it.
 
Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- 10/5/2009 Page 13

My poll:

1. Florida LW 1
2. Alabama 3
3. Texas 2
4. Va Tech 5
5. Boise St. 6
6. USC 7
7. Cinci 8
8. Ohio St. 10
9. TCU 9
10. Miami 13
11. LSU 4
12. Iowa 11
13. Kansas 12
14. Oregon 15
15. Penn St. 16
16. Okie St. 14
17. BYU 19
18. Oklahoma 20
19. South Florida 24
20. Houston 25
21. Nebraska 22
22. South Carolina NR
23. Pitt NR
24. Georgia Tech NR
25. Utah NR
 
Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- 10/5/2009 Page 13

Bubbler said:
I see what you did there, Slappy. :-*

Wisconsin's loss was to Ohio State on the road. It's not like the Buckeyes drummed them out of the Horseshoe, Wisconsin was in that game for quite a while.

Of the one-loss teams I put behind Wisconsin: Penn State lost at home to Iowa, Pitt lost to Duke-losing NC State, Rutgers to Cincinnati at home, Notre Dame to Michigan, Missouri to Nebraska at home, Tulsa at Oklahoma, Idaho at Washington. None of them have a win that is better than any one Wisconsin win, in fact, nearly all of them have wins over far inferior teams to Wisconsin. ****, Idaho might have the best win resume out of all of them.

Welcome aboard the Vandal bandwagon. Plenty of good seats still available! :D
 
Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- 10/12/2009 Page 14

Oct. 12, 2009

The Same Old Tears On A New Background
as Illustrated by the Blue and Gold


By SLAPPY4428
Leprechaun at Heart


They’re 4-1, have the nation’s No. 1 quarterback in passing efficiency and a Heisman candidate, won three games in the waning moments and could have atoned for their only loss.

So where’s the respect for Notre Dame? Where’s the love for the nation’s most visible program? Here, there’s none. Not that there’s a problem with that. In fact, you can take Notre Dame’s point total in all five of the previous regular-season weeks – 160 – and they’d be 22nd in this week’s poll.

Is it jealousy? Is it hatred of Charlie Weis? Is it a deep-rooted hatred for Jimmy Clausen? Is it all of the above?

Let’s ask the fine folks on the Notre Dame fan boards, always a font of reality. Take Clausen’s Heisman chances. At Blue and Gold Illustrated, “irishweis” is convinced there’s a conspiracy in the Heisman award.

“He'll never win it now. Give it to Bradford. I mean, that's what we'll be hearing from the media that Bradford is back in it with his performance yesterday. Oh, wait. Give it to Tebow. I mean he missed a game and really doesn't have great stats this year, but he did play decent when handing the ball off last night against LSU for the win. Sorry, what I meant to say is McCoy will win it.

“This is what the media wants anyway and I think we all know it. They are in love with those three QBs and have been from the moment they heard all were returning to school this year.

“Based on performance, Clausen should be hands down the front runner right now. If he plays well against USC and wins he's definitely in the lead, but with Fla, Okl and Fla having to play some other more high profile games this year, and with the conf championship games they will probably play in that gives the media more opportunity to salivate over those three QBs.”


Ahhh, how quickly they forget Paul Hornung and John Huarte…

We move on to the fact that Golden Domers might not have warmed up to Charlie Weis. Let’s face it, he’s not the most telegenic of coaches. Kind of a cross between Abe Gibron and R. Lee Ermey. And he’s not warm and fuzzy. And he thinks highly of himself. And he’s not Lou Holtz.

“I think there are a lot of ways Lou stands head, shoulders, torso, hips, thighs, and knees over Weis,” says PatH72. “I agree there are no excuses against USC. It's put up or shut up time. If we cannot beat them at home, with the players we have, this year then it's probably not going to happen very soon. I'm sure, however, that if we get within 30 or so of them there will be a sizable number of folks pointing out how we're "making progress" and will be able to beat them some undefined number of seasons into the future. I certainly hope we see a team fired up and unwilling to accept an 8th straight defeat to USC.”
Mh2365 has a counterpoint.
“Jesus ... Holtz talk again ...everyone does realize that was two decades ago right? If he was still coaching we'd be Florida St ... he proved the game passed him at South Carolina ... If Holtz was our coach next week vs. USC we would lose by 45 and maybe have 10 kids suspended for fighting after the game ...”

As for playing Southern Cal this week (Note: I expect a tersely worded harrumph from the Southern Cal media relations folks, who ask that media run USC, University of Southern California, So. California, Troy or Trojans and not to use Southern Cal. Remember, you can’t spell “suck” without “USC”.)

Some folks at NDNation have an interesting observation. A poster called NDduLac opined:

“First, if I'm Weis and Clausen's healthy enough, I'd go "five wide and no huddle" which would limit SC's ability to rotate defensive personnel from the outset. I still believe this is ND's only chance to beat SC.

“Second, I'm not sure why, but ND's offense just seems far more comfortable in the up-tempo game - everything offensively seems so much more fluid and every position's execution seems superior to me.

“Lastly, since the Irish are home, crowd noise shouldn't be a problem for audibles if necessary.”


When a poster named ACross opted to chide about his use of “If I’m Weis” in his argument, NDduLac opted for an indepth analysis --“**** off Andy, if you don't agree, no problem.”

This is what’s known as an improvement. Back in the day, many of those words would be misspelled from the fans of Chicagoland.

And of course, there is the tradition of Notre Dame – the Golden Dome, Touchdown Jesus, Fair Catch Corby, owning their own network, old men dressed up as Leprachauns, and of course, phantom penalties. There are people who understand this game and its complete ramifications in relation to God, college football and that this is more than just a game.

“Notre Dame has every advantage to finally beat USC.

1. The game is at home
2. We have mature talent
3. They are starting a freshman QB
4. They had to rebuild their defense this year.

The entire season rides on the outcome:

1. BCS berth
2. Recruting class
3. Clausen's Heisman candidacy
4. Charlie's job
5. Historical implications for a 5th loss by one coach

“After seeing that the intangibles and motivation are on our side, there is absolutely no excuse for a loss in this game. But, I predict a sound defeat. Our 4-1 record is not impressive...the wins or the loss (Michigan is not very good).

“This game has been circled on the calendar since last season. All chips are in. Anyone here who tries to downplay the importance of this game ("we should not expect to win", "we just need to be competitive", "rebuilding is hard"), does not understand the storied history of this great program.”


So I hope you remember all that when you vote next week. otherwise, The Oak will get you.

SportsJournalists.com COLLEGE FOOTBALL POLL
10/12/2009
RK. TEAM (1st) PTS Last

1. Florida (26) 841 1
2. Alabama (6) 805 3
3. Texas (2) 798 2
4. Virginia Tech 699 6
5. Boise State 695 5
6 . USC 646 6
7. Ohio State 609 8
8. Cincinnati 581 9
9. Texas Christian 548 10
10. LSU 535 4
11. Iowa 510 12
12. Oregon 449 14
13. Miami (Fla.) 438 11
14. Oklahoma St. 379 13
15. Penn State 344 15
16. Kansas 342 16
17. Nebraska 330 19
18. BYU 313 17
19. South Florida 238 22
20. Oklahoma 232 21
tie. Georgia Tech 232 23
22. Utah 110 NR
23. South Carolina 105 NR
24 Houston 66 NR
25 Notre Dame 47 NR
Also receiving votes: West Virginia 35, Pitt 31, Central Michigan 26, Mississippi 16, Missouri 12, Wisconsin 12, Auburn 9, Texas Tech 5, Arkansas 4, Cal 2, Michigan 2, Oregon State 2, Navy 1, Tulsa 1.


The SportsJournalists.com college football poll committee: Slappy4428 (chairman), 2muchcoffeeman, , Azom, Bubbler BYH, Della9250, Diabeetus, Dparker85, Elliotte Friedman, GB-Hack, Hammer Pants, Hank Scorpio, Huggy, Ishouldcoco, Jesus Muscatel, Joe Schmoe, KYsportswriter, Layman, Madhavok, Matt1735, Orville Redenbacher, Oz, Piotr Rasputin, Popedirkbenedict, Precious Roy, Red Smith Clone, Rumpleforeskin, , spnited, Starman, Stormsurge, Sxysptswrtr, Trooper Bari, WS, Songbird. Not Voting: Agate Page, Rockbottom.
 
Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- 10/12/2009 Page 14

Notre Dame will be trounced
 
Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- 10/12/2009 Page 14

Penn State ... I'm just not seeing what others are seeing here.
 
Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- 10/12/2009 Page 14

i'd love to see lefevour go up against penn state's defense (maybe we'll get that matchup in a bowl).
 
Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- 10/12/2009 Page 14

I can only assume the voters are waiting for Idaho to take the Fightin' McMackins behind the woodshed before joining the Vandals Bandwagon.
 
Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- 10/12/2009 Page 14

TrooperBari said:
I can only assume the voters are waiting for Idaho to take the Fightin' McMackins behind the woodshed before joining the Vandals Bandwagon.

Please ... that's Vandals Bandwagon TM.

You know, like Realtor ;D
 
Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- 10/12/2009 Page 14

@slappy: You didn't have to take my ballot (it was way late). Thanks for doing so anyway.


Anybody else completely unimpressed by Boise the other night? I thought they looked like they're good enough to win the championship ... of Conference USA. I have 'em at 8, but I'm rethinking it. What Tulsa presented shouldn't have even slowed a real title contender down.
 
Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- 10/12/2009 Page 14

I think we have about three pages dedicated to Boise on the NCAA football thread. Just saying. But it can certainly be discussed here. I have them at eight, I think. That's about where I feel they are.
 
Re: 2009 SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- 10/12/2009 Page 14

2muchcoffeeman said:
@slappy: You didn't have to take my ballot (it was way late). Thanks for doing so anyway.


Anybody else completely unimpressed by Boise the other night? I thought they looked like they're good enough to win the championship ... of Conference USA. I have 'em at 8, but I'm rethinking it. What Tulsa presented shouldn't have even slowed a real title contender down.

I was running late too, it was in when I was compiling the others. Love ya, but I didn't do it as a favor.

And Boise might have not looked great against a lesser team, but find me a top 5 team that will do that every game, all season. Every team has at least one bad game against an opponent they should smoke...
 

Latest posts

Back
Top