Great thanks. Don’t want to out, but you’ve gotta be Phil Mushnik. Because you ****ing hate everything.Kevin Smith is awful. His movies have terrible structure, are horribly self centered, and have a tone of misogony.
Forgive me if I don't find him a voice of a generation or even an artistic voice I can even give a **** about.
Love it.
Also:
“You know, there's a million fine looking women in the world, dude.But they don't all bring you lasagna at work.Most of 'em just cheat on you.”
Also also:
“Pack o' wraps, my brotherman, time to kick back, drink some beers and shmoke some weed!”
Clerks was funny, but it's not a well made film and not just because it was cheap. Smith's films are so poorly done. Any independent director from the '90's who is still around is so much better than Smith.Great thanks. Don’t want to out, but you’ve gotta be Phil Mushnik. Because you ****ing hate everything.
Some respect for consistency I guess.
Clerks was funny, but it's not a well made film and not just because it was cheap. Smith's films are so poorly done. Any independent director from the '90's who is still around is so much better than Smith.
His resume shows what Hollywood thinks of him. The results are in. He is not good.
Musically speaking, as a Gen-X'er I was never into Pearl Jam, Kurt Cobain or Nirvana. And I certainly don't know who Morton Feldman, Pierre Schaffer and Theodor Adorno were.Dude writes about Gen X with a lot of music references without mentioning Prince, Madonna, Pearl Jam, Beastie Boys (or hip hop at all) or MTV. He gives one sentence to Kurt Cobain and Nirvana - the same as Morton Feldman, Pierre Schaffer and Theodor Adorno (who the **** are they!?!). Is this Jann Wenner’s alt?
Musically speaking, as a Gen-X'er I was never into Pearl Jam
Rian Johnson, Danny Boyle, Wes Anderson, PT Anderson, Quentin Tarantino are around Smith's age or had a debut film around the time of Clerks. Their debuts were much better and they don't go begging for work 30 years later. Smith's problem isn't which movies Hollywood is making.I won't quibble with technique, that's been documented. Though, I think he improved in that aspect along the way. Clerks was basically a student film.
I'll absolutely push back on "what Hollywood thinks" and "he's not good." What Hollywood wants is largely awful, mass-produced, focus-group written garbage.
Smith has fans, obviously. Not everyone cup of tea and clearly not yours. Which is a-OK. But judging on "what Hollywood thinks" is a poor argument.
Rian Johnson, Danny Boyle, Wes Anderson, PT Anderson, Quentin Tarantino are around Smith's age or had a debut film around the time of Clerks. Their debuts were much better and they don't go begging for work 30 years later. Smith's problem isn't which movies Hollywood is making.
Slacker was seen as more of a Gen X movie, even though Linklater is technically a boomer.
I'm not a huge fan of either of the Andersons, but I never watch a movie and think they don't know what they are doing.It's a subjective argument you're making. As is with all art I suppose. I like some of the directors you listed. I'd also rather gouge my eyes out than watch a Paul Thomas Anderson movie. You seemingly feel the same way about Smith. To each their own.
Not sure if there's much else to discuss here.
PJ's last good song was Daughter. They were enormous ... then faded out pretty fast.
There is a lot I would argue against in this.Smith’s ****ty production values are an argument in favor of, not against, his being a Gen-X icon.
Tarantino is interesting. I certainly think he’s a Gen-X icon, but I don’t think he’s any more enduring figure than Smith. They both hit their high-water marks very early in their careers.
Tarantino is certainly more technically proficient, but Gen-Xers don’t really give much of a **** about that.
There is a lot I would argue against in this.
Smith's problem isn't just production values. The problems extend to story, structure, evenness of tone, a lack of anything resembling self awareness, all which ends up in overindulgence, shot very poorly.
Where is it that ****ty production is a staple of Gen X movies let alone defining?
I know people who hate Tarantino. The idea his career arc is in any way comparable to Kevin Smith's is absurd. Name a movie by Smith in the last 10 years you would want to watch. Hell, name a movie.
All the directors I mentioned are lauded for their ability. Gen X doesn't care?
Mumblecore? They showed much more talent than Smith could articulate.
Musically speaking, as a Gen-X'er I was never into Pearl Jam, Kurt Cobain or Nirvana. And I certainly don't know who Morton Feldman, Pierre Schaffer and Theodor Adorno were.
I truly think Smith isn't good.Gen X puts much greater emphasis on connection, and you can connect without all of the traditional Hollywood bells and whistles.
Honestly, reading your post makes me think about the growing chasm between critics and audiences, and how a lot of critics have completely lost touch with what makes a movie “good.”
I would never dare to compare Smith to Tarantino in terms of craft. Only that they both connected with our generation in a way few have. The zeitgeist, if you will.
Almost everyone my age will recognize and understand a quote from Clerks, Pulp Fiction, or Seinfeld.
My father was late 50's early 60's when the Internet and mobile phones became ubiquitous. Not only does he not know how to text, he doesn't understand voicemail. He will call back without listening to a message. I try taking him through apps, and things I find intuitive I have to explain to him in detail.I’m a geezer and my wife and I have two”kiddos.”
I spend most of my day on a computer working with a variety of ever-evolving software. When our 30-something explains in first-grade level language something technical I already know, I call it Z-splaining.
The 20-something usually only long-winded about newer social norms and language. Despite ingrained habits, I’m pretty aware of those norms. But calling that pontification X-splaining just doesn’t work.