worst judging?

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

henryhenry

Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2006
Messages
849
need help on obscure trivia:

in sports with subjective scoring (skating, gymnastics, diving, boxing, whatever) - what were some of the most disputed or grossly ridiculous outcomes?
 
Roy Jones Jr. in the Olympics

The good ol' figure skating scandal in 2002
 
I believe Nancy Kerrigan actually beat Oksana Baiul in the '94 Lillehammer Games, but an arithmetic error gave the gold to Baiul.

Also, Jamie Sale and Pelletiere (sp?); and Paul Hamm's all-around gold in the Athens Games.
 
Ice dancing has had several disputed results over the years. That's probably the dirtiest of the ice skating disciplines, which is dirty in general.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Sirs, Madames,

Boxing: Some will say Roy Jones in Seoul but he won three rounds of a three round fight. More extreme is at 118 and one of the great champs, Carlos Zarate getting jobbed against Lupe Pintor -- it was a virtual 15-round shutout for Zarate and the judges' scoring was just all over the place. Like they agreed to lie but couldn't keep the story straight.

Hockey: Kerry Fraser's blind-eye to 99's swordwork, LA vs Leafs 93.

Misc.: Orenthal.

YHS, etc
 
There was a Holyfield-Lewis heavyweight title fight (pretty sure it was them) that ended in a draw. Must've been the late 90s or early 2000s. The judge who scored it even was way off from the other judges, and later explained it by saying she had a bad angle for watching the fight.
 
I don't have the energy or the motivation to look the details, but Holyfield got jobbed big-time in the Olympics, as I recall.

And the skating thing where the Russians paid the French judge to out the fix in for their skaters -- or something like that -- in Salt Lake City.
 
Franklin said:
the entire 1988 olympic boxing competition was a fiasco

Is that when Holyfield got robbed? He was beating the **** out of the guy, but not hitting him in "scoring" spots, according to the (insane) judges.
 
John said:
Franklin said:
the entire 1988 olympic boxing competition was a fiasco

Is that when Holyfield got robbed? He was beating the **** out of the guy, but not hitting him in "scoring" spots, according to the (insane) judges.

holyfield lost in 84. in 88 a bunch of judges and refs (well over a dozen) were suspended for generally crappy performance--most notably in the roy jones fight. there were all sorts of rumors about fixes, etc.
 
henryhecht said:
would leonard-hagler 87 count as a bad decision?
That's tops along with the 1972 Olympic basketball game between the USA and Russia.
 
Whitaker-Chavez, 1993 in San Antonio. As thorough an asskicking as you'll ever see in boxing. A judge from an earlier fight was sitting next to me and said, "Lord, I don't know that Chavez has won a round."
The call? A draw. So blatant a **** job that the heavily Hispanic crowd booed like crazy. They knew.
Sports Illustrated used "robbed" as its cover headline.
 
Moderator1 said:
Whitaker-Chavez, 1993 in San Antonio. As thorough an asskicking as you'll ever see in boxing. A judge from an earlier fight was sitting next to me and said, "Lord, I don't know that Chavez has won a round."
The call? A draw. So blatant a **** job that the heavily Hispanic crowd booed like crazy. They knew.
Sports Illustrated used "robbed" as its cover headline.
Yeah, I agree. I was there but to be honest, I wasn't THAT surprised.
 
Not surprised at what? That Whitaker got ****ed or that he kicked Chavez' ass?
 
Men's basketball, 72 Olympics

That's never bothered me for a couple of reasons:

1. The controversial last 3 seconds was preceded by 39 minutes of the most godawful coaching in the annals of basketball.

2. The screwup at the end was more confusion than robbery. Was a timeout called? Was the USSR entitled to one? Did the proper information get relayed to the scorekeeper? Did the button the coaches press to request a timeout work properly? Why did that horn go off prematurely and the clock not reset properly on the USSR's so-called "second" attempt?

3. After all was said and done, the game was still in the USA's hands, and they had a 99 percent chance of winning. They just choked, like Kentucky did against Duke in 1992.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top