Boom_70 said:
deskslave said:
Boom_70 said:
Baron Scicluna said:
deskslave said:
Did you ask him why he wanted America to cut and run? Hey Boom, why do you want America to cut and run? Cut and run, cut and run, cut and run.
Remember that? Sound familiar?
I remember that. Nearly every GOP pol would say that phrase in every single speech in 2003 and 2004.
And the idiots in the mainstream media would report it, every single time.
And this is the reason why we should stay.. because what was written in 2003.
Times have changed. We need to change the narrative of our country with a bold move.
There would be little downside if Obama held a press conference tonight and announced that he is bring all troops home from Afghanistan as quick as possible.
What's that? Evaluate the situation differently in light of new facts? I'm pretty sure that's flip-flopping. Why would you encourage flip-flopping? Remember when John Kerry was a flip-flopper? Flip-flopper, flip-flopper, flip-flopper.
Really Obama flipflopped from his campaign commitment to to wind down war. Instead he ramped up.
If he ends now he would be living up to his campaign promise.
Right now he is at a point that Lyndon Johnson was around 1965/ 1966 in Viet Nam.
To be fair, there were over 180,000 U.S. troops at the end of '65 and quickly escalated from there. The communists grew their forces to over 230,000 including NVA regulars and VC guerillas. The north was also getting help/supplies/weapons from the Soviets and China.
I don't think the Taliban/AQ are that big in number or are getting help from all that many places.
Although I don't disagree with the basic premise of pulling out.