Dick Whitman
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 1, 2009
- Messages
- 45,703
I'm sure that the East Coast media will fully investigate Syracuse with vigor.
**** Whitman said:I'm sure that the East Coast media will fully investigate Syracuse with vigor.
farmerjerome said:trifectarich said:lone star scribe said:Good thing Syracuse already had its No. 1 seed locked up before the news got out. :![]()
Boeheim needs to get his house in order.
Yeah, he was on Mike and Mike today talking about depth and something struck me funny about the whole interview. Actually, something has struck me funny since his lack of urgency since they lost to Cincy.
I wouldn't be surprised if this doesn't end here, and Syracuse has to forfeit more games going back to the first suspension.
Guy_Incognito said:farmerjerome said:trifectarich said:lone star scribe said:Good thing Syracuse already had its No. 1 seed locked up before the news got out. :![]()
Boeheim needs to get his house in order.
Yeah, he was on Mike and Mike today talking about depth and something struck me funny about the whole interview. Actually, something has struck me funny since his lack of urgency since they lost to Cincy.
I wouldn't be surprised if this doesn't end here, and Syracuse has to forfeit more games going back to the first suspension.
I'm really not following this closely - what do we think the suspension is for?
farmerjerome said:Guy_Incognito said:farmerjerome said:trifectarich said:lone star scribe said:Good thing Syracuse already had its No. 1 seed locked up before the news got out. :![]()
Boeheim needs to get his house in order.
Yeah, he was on Mike and Mike today talking about depth and something struck me funny about the whole interview. Actually, something has struck me funny since his lack of urgency since they lost to Cincy.
I wouldn't be surprised if this doesn't end here, and Syracuse has to forfeit more games going back to the first suspension.
I'm really not following this closely - what do we think the suspension is for?
Academics
It didn't - he was already suspended for three games earlier in the season. The conventional wisdom is that he's basically punted on his classwork since the semester began.Guy_Incognito said:farmerjerome said:Guy_Incognito said:farmerjerome said:trifectarich said:lone star scribe said:Good thing Syracuse already had its No. 1 seed locked up before the news got out. :![]()
Boeheim needs to get his house in order.
Yeah, he was on Mike and Mike today talking about depth and something struck me funny about the whole interview. Actually, something has struck me funny since his lack of urgency since they lost to Cincy.
I wouldn't be surprised if this doesn't end here, and Syracuse has to forfeit more games going back to the first suspension.
I'm really not following this closely - what do we think the suspension is for?
Academics
How is it possible that it came out now? Is he the only lousy student athlete in the country?
RickStain said:I don't understand the play-in system at all.
Mystery Meat II said:RickStain said:I don't understand the play-in system at all.
What's to not understand? The weakest four conference champions and weakest four at-large teams play an extra game.
Everyone acts as if this is some massive affront to the sanctity of Division I college basketball, but play-in/first-round games were standard operating procedure for a few years in the 80s and also between 1953-1974.
Mystery Meat II said:RickStain said:I don't understand the play-in system at all.
What's to not understand? The weakest four conference champions and weakest four at-large teams play an extra game.
Everyone acts as if this is some massive affront to the sanctity of Division I college basketball, but play-in/first-round games were standard operating procedure for a few years in the 80s and also between 1953-1974.
RickStain said:Mystery Meat II said:RickStain said:I don't understand the play-in system at all.
What's to not understand? The weakest four conference champions and weakest four at-large teams play an extra game.
Everyone acts as if this is some massive affront to the sanctity of Division I college basketball, but play-in/first-round games were standard operating procedure for a few years in the 80s and also between 1953-1974.
The weakest four at-large teams are 14 seeds? I would have assumed higher.
I wasn't making a passive-aggressive commentary. I'm a casual fan who honestly didn't get it.
I think the committee said BYU and Iona would have been higher than a 14 seed, but they couldn't put them in different spots because those spots would have played Friday/Sunday, and they won't force BYU to play on Sunday.Baron Scicluna said:RickStain said:Mystery Meat II said:RickStain said:I don't understand the play-in system at all.
What's to not understand? The weakest four conference champions and weakest four at-large teams play an extra game.
Everyone acts as if this is some massive affront to the sanctity of Division I college basketball, but play-in/first-round games were standard operating procedure for a few years in the 80s and also between 1953-1974.
The weakest four at-large teams are 14 seeds? I would have assumed higher.
I wasn't making a passive-aggressive commentary. I'm a casual fan who honestly didn't get it.
They wanted to make it fair to the No. 16 seeds so they wouldn't all have to play an extra game in order to get squashed by the No. 1 seed.
That, and they didn't want four games involving eight No. 16 seeds. They wanted a couple of games that would feature BCS schools or upper-mid-majors.
RickStain said:Mystery Meat II said:RickStain said:I don't understand the play-in system at all.
What's to not understand? The weakest four conference champions and weakest four at-large teams play an extra game.
Everyone acts as if this is some massive affront to the sanctity of Division I college basketball, but play-in/first-round games were standard operating procedure for a few years in the 80s and also between 1953-1974.
The weakest four at-large teams are 14 seeds? I would have assumed higher.
I wasn't making a passive-aggressive commentary. I'm a casual fan who honestly didn't get it.