Running French Open thread

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

sportschick

Active Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2005
Messages
24,772
City & State/Province
Dreaming of Montana
It starts early Sunday morning, so I'm getting it started now.

Will Fed finally complete the career Slam?

Will Nadal win his fifth in a row, something six-time winner Borg couldn't even accomplish?

Will Safina join her brother (Mmmm, Marat, mmmm) as a Slam winner?

Will an American male make the second week?

Will Serena or Sharapova be healthy enough to make a run?

So many questions this year :D
 
I am nervous for my boy Andy Murray.

Chela in the first round, even if he is now 215 in the world, is a dangerous proposition.
 
JakeandElwood said:
I like Roddick's chances.

Roddick? Mr. I Haven't Won a Match at the French Since 2005?

Quite a limb to go out on there, JAE, quite a limb.

Not that it couldn't happen. I could become the fifth ex-Mrs. Sean Bean too :D
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
sportschick said:
It starts early Sunday morning, so I'm getting it started now.

Will Fed finally complete the career Slam?

No. Never on red clay.

sportschick said:
Will Nadal win his fifth in a row, something six-time winner Borg couldn't even accomplish?

Sounds logical enough, but the guy has to lose someday, doesn't he? 28-0 at that venue at age 22 is mind-boggling.

sportschick said:
Will Safina join her brother (Mmmm, Marat, mmmm) as a Slam winner?

Possible, but I wouldn't be the farm on it.

sportschick said:
Will an American male make the second week?

Some unknown will get a good draw and make the fourth round. But not Andy Roddick or James Blake.

sportschick said:
Will Serena or Sharapova be healthy enough to make a run?

No, and neither like clay to begin with.
 
I love the Federer-Nadal rivalry. It's right up there with Borg-McEnroe, Becker-Edberg and Sampras-Agassi.

But beyond those two and Novak Djokovic, men's tennis is a sham right now. Andy Roddick and James Blake never are real threats to upset the big boys and everyone seems to play the same style. Hardly anyone serves and volleys anymore, which makes for less exciting matches.

So, it's back to Federer and Nadal. Would be a monumental upset if either lost before the semis and there's a very real possibility of them meeting in the final for a fourth straight year.
 
Yeah, she won it in 2002 as part of her "Serena Slam". But she's had less success there than any other slam.

Nice win by Lleyton Hewitt, coming from two sets down to beat Ivo Karlovic. Karlovic served a Grand Slam record 55 aces, but looked dead at the end.

Hewitt is an interesting figure. I don't see how he can ever get back to the top ten, but yet he continues to grind it out, which is really hard for a guy who has been No. 1 in the world, won two Grand Slams and made his millions. Good for him.
 
He's going to have to do more than beat Juan Ignacio Chela --- impressive as it was --- to become a factor in a red clay tournament. I think Murray's best chance may be on a hard court. Suits his game and I suspect the pressure on him at Wimbledon year after year may be too much to handle, just as it was for Tim Henman.

Watching a women's match and still trying to get used to the phrase "World No. 1 Dinara Safina". Of all the Russians, I would have thought Kuznetsova or Dementieva to have a better shot at someday becoming no. 1 than Safina. But, hey, if Safina can do it, so can Victoria Azarenka.

What ever happened to Daniella Hantuchova? Women's tennis isn't the same without her.
 
Mark2010 said:
He's going to have to do more than beat Juan Ignacio Chela --- impressive as it was --- to become a factor in a red clay tournament. I think Murray's best chance may be on a hard court. Suits his game and I suspect the pressure on him at Wimbledon year after year may be too much to handle, just as it was for Tim Henman.

He's world No.3 and has a 6-2 record against Federer all-time.

Saying outside of Nadal, Federer and Djokovic men's tennis is a sham is way off.
 
GB-Hack said:
Mark2010 said:
He's going to have to do more than beat Juan Ignacio Chela --- impressive as it was --- to become a factor in a red clay tournament. I think Murray's best chance may be on a hard court. Suits his game and I suspect the pressure on him at Wimbledon year after year may be too much to handle, just as it was for Tim Henman.

He's world No.3 and has a 6-2 record against Federer all-time.

Saying outside of Nadal, Federer and Djokovic men's tennis is a sham is way off.

And del Potro is quickly becoming a factor as well. To say men's tennis consists of essentially three people is kinda silly.
 
sportschick said:
Roddick wins for the first time since 2005. Maybe JandE made the right choice :D

What I will say for Roddick is that he has seemed a little different this year. Little more focused, little closer to where he was at his peak.
 
GB-Hack said:
sportschick said:
Roddick wins for the first time since 2005. Maybe JandE made the right choice :D

What I will say for Roddick is that he has seemed a little different this year. Little more focused, little closer to where he was at his peak.

Maybe it's cause he's done chasing girls? You're right though. He seems more, well, with it these days. I'll still be surprised if he makes the second week at Roland Garros. He did look good today though.
 
Back
Top