How is the fault not partly on the writer? The story made very little sense. What 10-year-old has access to $8,500 to spend on something he was initially told was off-limits? Or anything? Even if it's in an account or trust fund, who does a 10-year-old call or how does he get to the ATM to get this money? What does this family do for a living that their son can decide he wants and can buy some expensive piece of memorabilia? Did the parents finally relent, letting their son get what he wanted instead of keeping the money in a college fund?
These are questions the writer should've asked, because it's a massive hole in the story. Oh, because he once liked baseball cards, five years ago -- when he was 5? I read it several times, and it never added up. That's on the reporter.
If he asked and the mom was evasive, he should've written as much. It's a fine tale, but the reporting was lacking here.