Buck
Well-Known Member
Maybe people don't agree with her policy positions.
Had a huge lead, blew it, kept relying on the top stars until they were worn out and suffered losses in Pennsylvania.
Off by about 2.4 points, which is as close as polls get. She had a lead between 3-4, will wind up winning popular vote between 1.2-2. Polls of less than 1000 likely voters don't account for electoral college.The national polls were pretty much right
I can't blame her for Florida, probably not even N.C. And I don't know how much a spending push in Big 10 country would have helped. You can develop the world's costliest dog food, but if the dogs don't like it ...
I think a lot of it was the campaign Clinton ran. She has assumed from Day 1 that she was entitled to be president, that she should be anointed, because it was her turn and she was a woman, by golly, and she ran her campaign that way from start to finish. She didn't work hard enough for it, presumed too much in too many states, and didn't fire up the marginal liberal-leaning votes in key metro areas. Plus, I suspect that there is more to the health issue than she or anyone else let on during the campaign. I don't think she's particularly well health-wise, and maybe that played into her lack of enthusiasm for the race.
Also, nobody has given Trump credit for the campaign he has run. Early on, he sensed the mood of the country and he played to that mood relentlessly. So what started out as a joke became a movement, and he and his people were right at every step along the way.
It has been three months since Trump had a press availability. Your post is just a myth.
Besides Doc, who are the other 10 who predicted a Trump win? Come forward and receive your prize!
Trump's problem now is what Clinton's would've been had she won, distrust and dislike from a majority of the public.
Does he know what and where Martha's Vineyard is?