Why do the Dodgers suck now?

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Some people got leading the division by an ungodly margin with actually accomplishing something, like, getting out of the first round of the playoffs.
 
They get better, but stay young. Biggest mistake letting Grienke walk away, too much talent in farm system to not trade someone. Stretches like this happen when you're young and not mentally prepared everyday.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
When they were like 96-10, I kept looking at the roster, especially without Kershaw, and thinking, "This lineup is 99-6?"
 
1-15 stretches happen?
I believe this was year ago, remember when the Giants had a great first half, then after all-star break, we couldn't buy a win? Barely made the playoffs and eliminated by the Cubs I believe. And that was a veteran team, a lot older, but still had pieces to win.
 
I don't know what makes me happier.
Seeing the Dodgers start to **** the bed, or knowing that the Indians may win 40 games in a row, get to the World Series, and still **** it up.
 
1-16. The "1" being a Kershaw 1-0 win over the Padres on Sept. 1.

Here's a crazy thing though. Before starting their streak, the Indians were 70-56 and well ahead in the division.

So the Indians have won 19 in a row ... and the Dodgers have lost 16 of 17 ... and the Dodgers are STILL 4.5 games ahead.
 
Were the Dodgers playing above their heads in June and July, or are they playing below their heads in September?
 
The Nats clinched. Does Harper come back? Will Stras and Scherzer pitch without injury in the playoffs? Stay focused!!!
 
Per company policy, the Nationals are saving them all for future postseasons.

In February of 2012 (when literally no one was picking the Nats to win the East), the team - and I presume Stephen - agreed it was in Strasburg's best interest to be on an innings limit that year. When August came around, was it suddenly no longer in Stephen's best interest to be on an innings limit that year? Had the team's success magically healed Stephen's elbow more efficiently?
 
LOL. It changed the equation a little bit, don'tcha think?

For the record, I was with them on it. But it was a close call. And it's awesome to poke at them with.
 
Harper's hurt?

I couldn't tell the difference. He never plays when he's healthy, either.
 
LOL. It changed the equation a little bit, don'tcha think?


"Hey Stephen - look I know we said, 'It's best if you're on an innings limit this year,' but now that we might need you, we were just kidding. It will be perfectly fine if you throw however many innings as the team needs."
 

Latest posts

Back
Top