Where would you rather start...?

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Joined
Jul 30, 2006
Messages
204
After college would you prefer to start:

At a little bit larger of a paper for a newbie ... (say, 50-75K) in a small media market where your paper has no competition and no real way to make media connections besides TV and people at your own paper...

OR

A smaller paper (15-30K) that's an hour from a large media market, where you would be near some pro sports, major college stuff, but obviously you would be a extremely small fish in an extremely large pond.


I guess an example would be something like ... Savannah, Ga. vs. Marietta, Ga - outside atlanta for you non-southerners.


Thoughts?
 
Wherever they'll give you a job, with a paycheck and everything. If you don't have job offers from both places, then it's kind of a silly question, isn't it?

I don't mean to be harsh, but it seems like you might be getting ahead of yourself a little.
 
The better paper, regardless of size. A paper that's going to let you have space to write and latitude with your ideas and then help you execute them. Knowing what I know now, that's most important of all, even more than circulation, pay scale, etc. You can atrophy very quick without a nurturing situation.
 
Barsuk said:
Wherever they'll give you a job, with a paycheck and everything. If you don't have job offers from both places, then it's kind of a silly question, isn't it?

I don't mean to be harsh, but it seems like you might be getting ahead of yourself a little.

It's a simple scenario question... If you had to do it over again, which one do you think is best.... Don't make it so difficult.
 
More important than the size of the paper and your coverage area is whether or not you can live in that area, can you work with the people there and does the paper have a good track record of developing young talent.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Thanks for comin' out said:
After college would you prefer to start:

At a little bit larger of a paper for a newbie ... (say, 50-75K) in a small media market where your paper has no competition and no real way to make media connections besides TV and people at your own paper...

OR

A smaller paper (15-30K) that's an hour from a large media market, where you would be near some pro sports, major college stuff, but obviously you would be a extremely small fish in an extremely large pond.


I guess an example would be something like ... Savannah, Ga. vs. Marietta, Ga - outside atlanta for you non-southerners.


Thoughts?

Assuming you don't plan to grow roots at either spot, it depends on what you would be doing.

If your main beat at the bigger paper is preps and a local juco vs. covering lots of pro games and major college sports at the smaller paper, I'd probably go with the smaller paper.

You would likely make more connections and learn more and have the chance to be noticed if you worked hard.

Lots of up and comers from smaller papers are touted by writers at bigger papers and that's how they get the chance to move up.
 
Thanks for comin' out said:
Barsuk said:
Wherever they'll give you a job, with a paycheck and everything. If you don't have job offers from both places, then it's kind of a silly question, isn't it?

I don't mean to be harsh, but it seems like you might be getting ahead of yourself a little.

It's a simple scenario question... If you had to do it over again, which one do you think is best.... Don't make it so difficult.

But it's not a simple scenario, as you can see from the posts so far. It's a very complex question that you'll answer if and when necessary (hopefully after much thought and deliberation, pros and cons lists, etc.).

There is no correct answer. It depends on so many things, and even then, it depends on the person. I've been happier covering colleges at small papers than preps at bigger papers, and vice versa.

If you get job offers from two places that fit your scenario, you'll have to make that decision, and it probably won't be an easy one. You'll probably always wonder what would have happened if you had taken the other path.
 
Go wherever you can learn the most. I hate to say it, but at a lot of small shops, the SE doesn't usually take time out to make his reporters better. And yes, some of that is the reporter's responsibility to ask for help.
But as a guy who started at a large paper, I was forced to learn fast or lose my job. Thankfully, I'm a quick learner.
There's no point to having a ton of room to write what you want, if the stories turn out like **** and you think they smell like roses.
 
If I had to do it over again coming out of college? That's simple, I'd have gone to law school or med school and gotten into a profession where I could make some real money.....
 
zagoshe said:
If I had to do it over again coming out of college? That's simple, I'd have gone to law school or med school and gotten into a profession where I could make some real money.....

Those medical schools in Central America that will take folks with a C+ average are expensive, though.
 
My first full-time job was with two suburbans with a combined 110K circulation, and I got to cover the pros. We had a lot of talent on that staff -- including one guy who is now a major-metro columnist and another who has been the top editor on a couple major magazines. And while some of us eventually managed to cover pros on metros, all of us who made the jump from there did so as deskmen, including the aforementioned columnist, although his stay on the desk was brief. Unless you are breaking news on the beat -- hard to do against top reporters in a highly competitive, multi-daily market -- you are just another face in the crowd.

My next stop was with a mid-major, No. 1 in its market. There was another young desk guy there who wanted to write and wound up taking a job covering pro sports for a 35K. Now he since has done very well -- very, very, very well -- as a sports reporter, but he was stuck on that 35K for about six years. About a year after he got there I had moved to a major metro and I kept recommending this guy, and the SE kept saying his clips are kind of average. I kept saying, well, he's writing six stories a day, how can anyone be a wordsmith with that kind of workload? One time he came out my way -- on Friday he covered an NBA game, on Saturday a major-college football game, on Sunday an NFL game, and on each day he also filed a bunch of NFL stories as that was his beat. We managed to squeeze in a few drinks Saturday night after each of us finished work and I felt kind of powerless to help him. I knew he'd be great if he'd just catch a break, and indeed he was, like immediately, when a metro finally gave him a chance. Less than a year after going to that metro, The National took him.
 
Thanks for comin' out said:
After college would you prefer to start:

I guess an example would be something like ... Savannah, Ga. vs. Marietta, Ga - outside atlanta for you non-southerners.

If one of your choices truly was Marietta, you'd be better off working for someone's family newsletter.
 
I've seen many paths.
But, look a little beyond the job.
How is the Sports Editor?
Has he been there for a while?
Do writers have a history of improving at the paper?
Secondly, if you're a writer, you want a little turnover. That means one of two things. Either the place sucks. Or, the paper has a reputation for turning young writers into good young writers. Obviously you want the latter. Why Writers are getting noticed outside the paper. And, it's good for changing and advancing in beats within the paper.
 
Ace said:
zagoshe said:
If I had to do it over again coming out of college? That's simple, I'd have gone to law school or med school and gotten into a profession where I could make some real money.....

Those medical schools in Central America that will take folks with a C+ average are expensive, though.

C+ -- Ace you give me way too much credit... ;D
 
zagoshe said:
Ace said:
zagoshe said:
If I had to do it over again coming out of college? That's simple, I'd have gone to law school or med school and gotten into a profession where I could make some real money.....

Those medical schools in Central America that will take folks with a C+ average are expensive, though.

C+ -- Ace you give me way too much credit... ;D

I didn't want to undersell you, zags.
 
Started out by moving cross-country to Abilene, before it became the festering ****hole it is today (or at least, was last year). Got a chance to work with great people and do a little bit of everything. Learned a lot and left with great experience. Didn't mind the drive to DFW.

Find a place like that and you'll be in pretty good shape.
 
Shifty Squid said:
Thanks for comin' out said:
After college would you prefer to start:

I guess an example would be something like ... Savannah, Ga. vs. Marietta, Ga - outside atlanta for you non-southerners.

If one of your choices truly was Marietta, you'd be better off working for someone's family newsletter.

You beat me to it. I was going to say Marietta is a bad example. It can be a career-killer.
 
You'll know when you meet with the people at the different papers. My first job was at a smaller-type (30-35k circ) and about half an hour from a major city with a couple of pro teams. I learned more from that job than any since. Write, edit, paginate, write on deadline, agate, features, breaking news, sports, occasional news, write headlines, take call-ins (ugh). Never took a photo, though. Still, experience was second to none.

That being said, times have changed. You have to decide what's right for your skill set now. If you're on the desk, you could probably aim a little higher. Writers can't be too choosey.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top