DanOregon said:I've never been one to pooh-pooh a season before it airs or gnash my teeth at returning players, but this season just doesn't interest me. It isn't so much bringing back Colton, or Redemption Island, and I think loved ones is an interesting twist, BUT - would have been more interesting if it wasn't returning players against their loved ones, it would have been more interesting if it wasn't obvious everyone had another connection on the island, it would have been more interesting if there were far fewer returning players, maybe six total.
The biggest thing I watch the show for is seeing how strangers develop relationships and a social structure, and how that changes as first impressions give way to actual performance, strategy and social skills. This one has the stink of a reunion show.
Buck said:Speaking as a fan, I don't need any twists.
I like the regular game.
bigpern23 said:Buck said:Speaking as a fan, I don't need any twists.
I like the regular game.
Has there ever been a "regular game?" Seems like every season always has new twists, turns, rules and surprises.
I despise that they're bringing Colton back.
Mizzougrad96 said:I guess now that I think about it, I would rather have regular seasons with the occasional all-stars mixed in every 10 seasons (five years) or so. I think that was one of the problems Survivor and Big Brother for that matter, had in recent seasons was that too many returning players for too many seasons made the pool to have an occasional player return seem a bit more shallow. It does get a bit absurd when some people play a fourth time, although, I didn't mind so much the season Boston Rob won.
They need to focus on new players for awhile so people can actually care enough to want someone to come back for a second time. They haven't done that in a few years, and I don't think there is anyone in this cast who anyone is dying to see again.
MTM said:At least we won't have to watch Russell Hantz and his idiot nephew.
I'm sure they were lined up before Brandon's meltdown last season.
Mizzougrad96 said:At this point, if they said, "Nobody who has ever played before, will play again." I would be fine with that.
When they did the first all-stars, most of them were people who people wanted to see play again.
If you get behind completely new casts rather than overshadow them by some player coming back who was never that popular in the first place then they'll be better off in the long run.
The season where Rob and Russell were captains was one thing... They needed a ratings boost and they got it that season and people actually wanted to see those two play again.
Is anybody clamoring to see Gervase again? I don't think so.
DanOregon said:I liked the season where they brought back people who had to evacuated out for medical reasons.
bigpern23 said:Mizzougrad96 said:At this point, if they said, "Nobody who has ever played before, will play again." I would be fine with that.
When they did the first all-stars, most of them were people who people wanted to see play again.
If you get behind completely new casts rather than overshadow them by some player coming back who was never that popular in the first place then they'll be better off in the long run.
The season where Rob and Russell were captains was one thing... They needed a ratings boost and they got it that season and people actually wanted to see those two play again.
Is anybody clamoring to see Gervase again? I don't think so.
The problem, Mizzou, is that the general public seems to disagree with you. Ratings for seasons with returning players are always higher than for all-new casts.