Bob Cook said:
How can Mittens be the inevitable when he won (if he really did) by eight votes in Iowa, and only got 39 percent in a state that was supposed to be a slam dunk? I know that having so many candidates increases the chances that the win comes as a plurality, but Mitt is hardly wowing 'em.
Plus, this Bain Capital thing is killing him for the general. He has no idea how to respond that doesn't make him sound like a to-the-manor-born douchebag. As much as the "I-could-have-a-beer-with-that-guy" argument for voting makes you cringe, to win a campaign you have to connect personally with people, and Romney just can't do that. Merely voting for him to vote against Obama isn't going to win him the election.
He's the "inevitable" nominee because none of the other candidates have proven they have the combination of money, infrastructure and campaigning skills needed to outlast him. Unless one of others proves that he can outlast Romney (and time is running very short to do that), he won't get the money to flow his way, his campaign will whither and Romney will win this thing quickly.
As for this Bain Capital thing, it could turn out to be to Romney what Rev. Jeremiah Wright was to Obama in '08: a potentially major problem that came out late enough in the primary process to not derail Romney in the primary, but still early enough in the total campaign that it could be old news by the time the general election rolls around. It's going to be hard for Obama to keep the "Romney as a real-life Gordon Gekko" meme going for 10 months. Definitely possible, but hard.