Sister Souljah > William Shakespeare

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

She's kidding, right? The writer of the Q&A just didn't get sarcasm, right?

No? Just one of the most ignorant attempts to play the race card ever? Got ya.

Check back in 400 years and see if even one person remembers anything she wrote. Given that relatively few know about her work now, I'm betting that doesn't go well for her. Crap like this is just so annoying because it makes a mockery of real racial issues.

Somebody needs to explain this to her. This isn't about black and white. This is about work that stands the test of time and stuff nobody has heard of even while the author is still with us.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
I'll say it: Shakespeare sucks.

Thou roguish swag-belled nut-hook! Thou infecious spur-galled clack-dish! Thou tottering earth-vexing ratsbane! Thou goatish hasty-witted varlet! Though gleeking urchin-snouted mumble-news!

(See what you did? Now you've got me playing with Shakespeare insults again!)
 
Jealousy is the green-eyed monster.

A sentence we could not write without Shakespeare. (Green-eyed is among the many words and phrases he is credited with inventing).

I kid MC, but I certainly get people not liking Shakespeare. The man would always write 100 words when four or five would do. But just the impact of his work alone is undeniable. There is yet another movie based on his work coming out next month (Though I'll be waiting for it to come out on Redbox)
 
She'll always have the lede-in to the iconic song and video, one of the best of any genre the last 25 years.

This is Sister Souljah
Public Enemy, Security of the First World, and all allied forces
Are traveling west to head off a white supremacy scheming
To destroy the national celebration of Martin Luther Kings birthday
Public Enemy believes that the powers that be in the states of New Hampshire and Arizona
have found psychological discomfort in paying tribute to a black man who tried to teach white people
the meaning of civilization. Good luck brothers, show 'em what you got ...

 
There's also nothing wrong with her thinking that her work is superior. It is if she thinks it is.

I think the black inferiority complex thing is a whole other thing worthy of discussion. I'd actually like to see Whitlock write about that at length.
 
There's also nothing wrong with her thinking that her work is superior. It is if she thinks it is.

I think the black inferiority complex thing is a whole other thing worthy of discussion. I'd actually like to see Whitlock write about that at length.

I have no issue with her thinking or saying that her work is superior. Confidence is a good thing, even if it is somewhat delusional confidence.

I do have an issue with her making it a racial thing. If I say Joe Montana was better than some obscure Division III college quarterback that nobody has ever heard of and the latter happens to be African-American, would that be a racial thing?
 
She's kidding, right? The writer of the Q&A just didn't get sarcasm, right?

No? Just one of the most ignorant attempts to play the race card ever? Got ya.

Check back in 400 years and see if even one person remembers anything she wrote. Given that relatively few know about her work now, I'm betting that doesn't go well for her. Crap like this is just so annoying because it makes a mockery of real racial issues.

Somebody needs to explain this to her. This isn't about black and white. This is about work that stands the test of time and stuff nobody has heard of even while the author is still with us.

The great thing is, where did that question come from. Would it not make more sense to compare her to a contemporary author, unless she make a comment or comparison to Shakespeare at one time. Then no follow up question. Pretty sure Shakespeare is considered an all-time great, so wouldn't she follow with, 'Is there anyone today on your level or as accomplished' This interview should have been done for the Mini Page.
 
The great thing is, where did that question come from. Would it not make more sense to compare her to a contemporary author, unless she make a comment or comparison to Shakespeare at one time. Then no follow up question. Pretty sure Shakespeare is considered an all-time great, so wouldn't she follow with, 'Is there anyone today on your level or as accomplished' This interview should have been done for the Mini Page.

She compared her work favorably to Romeo & Juliet, Catcher in the Rye and something else (I forget which it was). That was a follow-up.
 
Aaah. Glanced quickly at it the first time. Swift is the other author she made a comparison to.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top