Sampras knocks off Federer

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

sportschick

Active Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2005
Messages
24,772
City & State/Province
Dreaming of Montana
In an exhibition :D

Sampras stuns Federer in straight sets in exhibition
MACAU — Pete Sampras stunned Roger Federer in straight sets Saturday to win the third and final match of their Asian exhibition series.
Sampras, who retired in 2002, won both his break points against the world’s No. 1 player in the 7-6 (8), 6-4 upset at the Venetian Macao arena.
“It’s one for the old guy,” the American said after the win.
Earlier, Sampras lost to Federer 6-4, 6-3 in Seoul on Tuesday and 7-6 (6), 7-6 (5) in Kuala Lumpur on Thursday.
 
Holy ****ing ****.

I saw the tiebreaker scores yesterday, and was hella impressed by Pete. But I gotta admit I thought that was the best he could do against Roger.

Damn.
 
The first tennis match I ever saw on television was Sampras-Chang. It's refreshing to see Sampras' name back in the news.
 
mike311gd said:
The first tennis match I ever saw on television was Sampras-Chang. It's refreshing to see Sampras' name back in the news.

wtf, are you 12?

or am i just really, really old?
 
That's pretty cool.

But remember the key word . . . exhibition.

Even Andy Roddick beat Federer in an exhibition.

And you see how things turn out every time they play for real.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Most of those exhibitions are completely fixed to go three sets and to be as entertaining as possible...

I watched McEnroe play Agassi once where Agassi probably could have won 6-0, 6-0, but instead, it was 6-1, 5-7, 6-1. The crowd loved it, but anyone with a clue knew what was going on...

Sampras was one of the best ever, but unless he does this to Federer in a grand slam, the win means nothing...
 
HoopsMcCann said:
mike311gd said:
The first tennis match I ever saw on television was Sampras-Chang. It's refreshing to see Sampras' name back in the news.

wtf, are you 12?

or am i just really, really old?

I'm 24, sir. So take that however you want.
 
HoopsMcCann said:
mike311gd said:
The first tennis match I ever saw on television was Sampras-Chang. It's refreshing to see Sampras' name back in the news.

wtf, are you 12?

or am i just really, really old?

Really old. But one of the only things that makes me feel good about being really old are my memories of Borg/MCEnroe at Wimbeldon in 1980 (when I actually was 11 or 12).
 
Pete's my all-time favorite. Played with such class and dignity, but he was a killer on the loose. If only he'd won the French.
 
Songbird said:
Pete's my all-time favorite. Played with such class and dignity, but he was a killer on the loose. If only he'd won the French.

Reminds me of Tim Duncan... One of the best ever, but one of the most uninteresting people ever...

These days, that's a bit refreshing, but the guy has no personality...
 
Mizzougrad96 said:
Songbird said:
Pete's my all-time favorite. Played with such class and dignity, but he was a killer on the loose. If only he'd won the French.

Reminds me of Tim Duncan... One of the best ever, but one of the most uninteresting people ever...

These days, that's a bit refreshing, but the guy has no personality...

That's what happens when from age 8 to about 28, you have no life outside of tennis. Something he basically admits.
 
Agassi, McEnroe, Connors and Roddick all seem to be OK despite that...

Sampras is not a bad guy. He's a class act. His only crime is being boring...
 
How sad was it that Sampras was the most dominant player of his era -- doing just as much as Federer -- and he was blasted for being boring and interest in tennis went down. I'm not sure what Federer does that is that much more exciting than Sampras.
 
As a bit of an aside, did anyone else watch that McEnroe-Becker Davis Cup match that went 6 1/2 hours? I watched the first 3 hours, went to play basketball for 2 hours, and was stunned when I came back home and it was still going.

And sure, Petey was boring, but I always overlooked that because he was just so devastating.
 
Mizzougrad96 said:
Agassi, McEnroe, Connors and Roddick all seem to be OK despite that...

Sampras is not a bad guy. He's a class act. His only crime is being boring...

Completely agree he's not a bad guy. He was a helluva player, played with a ton of class and a great respect for the history of the sport and was a very tough competitor, even if he didn't show it on the outside.

But all the guys you mentioned had lives outside of their sports. McEnroe and Connors spent some time in college and got married at pretty young ages — I think Connors married a former Penthouse Pet — and Agassi and Roddick went Hollywood for a while.

Would all four have maybe won a few more Slams if they'd had the total focus that Pete had? Probably, almost certainly in Agassi's case.
 
Mizzougrad96 said:
Agassi, McEnroe, Connors and Roddick all seem to be OK despite that...

Sampras is not a bad guy. He's a class act. His only crime is being boring...

Always good to assume the "accepted wisdom" as the truth. I guess ESPN said do.

Good journalism instincts. ;-)

That's his rap, and that will always be his rap.

If you had an opportunity to watch courtside as the guy played in his prime, you would think differently. You wouldn't find him boring in the least.

One big problem with tennis writers (the "embedded", I like to call them, like many other specialists in "smaller" sports) is that the questions are never any good at pressers. The writers who know something about the sport don't want to waste a good question that will fill the notebooks of everyone in attendance.

The local writers who cover from week to week don't really know what to ask.

If you're the type willing to make chicken soup out of chicken s..t, you can come across as "not boring."

If you just don't care, or just want to go have a rubdown, you return in kind.

It's funny how people perceived Agassi and Sampras back in the day.
Agassi was the wild guy, Sampras the "quiet, classy guy" even though every second word that came out of his mouth (off camera) started with an "f" and ended with a "k".

Look who turned out to be the philosopher king, the philanthropist and, if he felt like it, far and away the best analyst in the business (a glimpse during the U.S. Open this year was enough to make one salivate).

It's all about what people want you to see, or about apathy. No one can make any kind of judgment about the kind of person a high-profile athlete is, because the sample size we get to see is too small.

Too bad people draw conclusions anyway. ;-)
 
Well said, as always.

Exhibit 1B: Greg Maddux. Most profane mouth in baseball. :D
 
That's Mr. Hall-of-Fame Potty Mouth to you. :D

I'll take his brother Mike every time (except on the mound).
 
Songbird: I remember watching most of that epic match... it made me exhausted just watching it.

I was a Connors fan, but always respected McEnroe a ton for being so loyal to Davis Cup.
 
Back
Top