Sorry, I wasn't aware.I posted on the journalism thread. MODs, whichever one you want to keep.
An pioneer in the biz. RIP.
Sorry, I wasn't aware.
Pretty much simultaneous. This one might get more traction. I wasn't sure where to put it.
Impossible to explain to the kids these days how magical that USA Today Sports section was for a time. Martzke a significant part of it.
You could say that about tons of sports sections pre-Y2K.
For sure, I grew up on the murderers-row AJC (Kindred, Mort, et al). Then USA Today came with that unique (for the time) layout and it just felt like a candy store of info. And with distribution back then, in a major city, you could get it with the late scores.
... and the Spirits of St. Louis.One of his previous jobs was PR chief of the ABA's Miami Floridians. Added a lot of insight and funny stories to Terry Pluto's book.
No matter how fast you type, nothing was faster than scanning all those stats on one page.Man, when USA Today had a full page of baseball team-by-team player stats once a week, that pretty much was nirvana. Remember when the AP would run expanded batting and pitching agate on Sundays?
I used to have to wait for The Sporting News, which would be a few days behind, depending on when it'd show up in the mail. Then Baseball Weekly debuted.
Now I can access anything I want via Baseball Reference, Fangraphs or Retrosheet, so my copies of Baseball Encyclopedia and Total Baseball are really heavy paperweights.
Impossible to explain to the kids these days how magical that USA Today Sports section was for a time. Martzke a significant part of it.
The Buffalo Braves too, I believe.... and the Spirits of St. Louis.
Man, when USA Today had a full page of baseball team-by-team player stats once a week, that pretty much was nirvana. Remember when the AP would run expanded batting and pitching agate on Sundays?
Network types either loved him, feared him, or hated him. Sometimes all three.