The two-time Pulitzer winning author was 89.
... his books were just introductions to a subject.
The late Robert Ferrell's work might be of interest to you. His biography of Truman was released, oh, a couple of years after McCullough's.I have a hard time believing anyone could write about Truman in more detail than he did.
Damn. I read the Great Bridge, 1776 and currently working on the Pioneers. Gifted author with a way with words.
Will be missed.
I have a hard time believing anyone could write about Truman in more detail than he did.
The late Robert Ferrell's work might be of interest to you. His biography of Truman was released, oh, a couple of years after McCullough's.
Ferrell's book is more of a dry read, him being an academic. The major difference I remember between the two is McCullough claimed Truman was not told by Secretary of War Stimson about the atomic bomb until later in the evening of his swearing-in. Ferrell claims Truman already had been made aware of the weapon.
RIP David McCullough.
Well said.His treating of the atomic bomb knowledge bothered me. It was careless.
I believe McCullough had a narrative (and I don’t mean that in the pejorative way a certain bean grinder would.) He naturally wanted you to like the subject he was writing about as much as he did. and his considerable gifts made that something you were apt to do. I found his writing about Adams to suffer from that more than his Truman book, but it was there, too.
But he also sent me on reading journeys on the Wright Brothers, Adams, Johnstown and Truman, which is a credit to how accessible he made history.
He was great, but I think you should dig deeper after reading his stuff. The more boring, academic ones probably include some stuff the romantic won’t.
I believe McCullough had a narrative (and I don’t mean that in the pejorative way a certain bean grinder would.) He naturally wanted you to like the subject he was writing about as much as he did. and his considerable gifts made that something you were apt to do. I found his writing about Adams to suffer from that more than his Truman book, but it was there, too.