One sentence and, boy, am I tired

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

trifectarich

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2003
Messages
4,844
Anyone see Sunday's New York Times magazine? It's the annual issue of stories dedicated to notable people who died throughout the year. At any rate, to open the piece on Bobby Fischer, the first sentence I counted to be 407 words. Someone in that building had to know that was a great way to confuse readers and/or make them turn the page. I would have pasted the atrocity here, but I don't think my computer has enough memory to copy something that big.
 
For your reading pleasure ... I dare you to make it all the way through this:


Before he was secretly buried on a dark winter morning in a lonely Icelandic churchyard at the age of 64 (there were only four people in attendance at the hastily arranged funeral) . . . before his last ailing days of bad kidneys and rotting teeth (he had all of his fillings removed, convinced that U.S. and Russian agents would otherwise send radio signals to his brain) . . . before the long hours whiled away at a Reykjavik bookstore, a place that vaguely reminded him of one from his Brooklyn youth (in both, he read comic books and studied chess) . . . and before his decades of ghostly peregrinations through the world, like a profane monk or an idiot savant searching for perfect exile (from Pasadena to Hungary to the Philippines, where he supposedly had a child, and on to Japan, where he supposedly married and was arrested and imprisoned for a passport violation) . . . before his bizarre eruptions (he applauded the events of 9/11 as “wonderful news” and believed, among other defamations, that the Jews wanted to eradicate the African elephant because its trunk was a reminder of an uncircumcised penis) . . . and before the spectacle of meeting his one-time nemesis, the former world-champion chess player Boris Spassky, for an anticlimactic 1992 rematch in war-torn Yugoslavia despite U.N. sanctions against it (in front of whirring cameras, he spat on the U.S. order forbidding him to play) . . . even way back before their original 1972 meeting, called the Match of the Century, when the eyes of the world were riveted on him as a shining emblem of American will, innovation and brilliance (the match in which he took on the Soviet chess machine and single-handedly crushed it, but not before the fabled call from Henry Kissinger, urging him to put aside his jumbled demands and just play) . . . even before his brazen, almost obnoxious deconstruction of a cavalcade of grandmasters who stood in his path to Spassky (he won 20 games in a row, the longest winning streak in modern chess) . . . before he traded the rags of his youth for his new wardrobe of expensive suits . . . before his mind slowly unhinged and he became a walking paradox (the anti-Semitic Jew; the anti-American national hero, the wastrel-wizard of his craft) . . . yes, before the whole circus of his life unfolded, he was a 13-year-old kid in the first flush of the thing he most loved in the world: chess.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
I am generally not a fan of either ellipsis or really run-on sentences, but I do like how that brings it all back to "the thing he loved most in the world: chess."

And there were several excellent details.

I'm kind of digging it, though I don't know that I'd ever try it.
 
I liked it alright, especially in the context of the issue -- which is a collection of mini-biographies of people who died in 2008, some famous, some not.

It was, I thought, an interesting way to get a lot of scattered info to grab the reader who might've been thinking "Bobby Fischer, I've already read about him."
 
And stringing together a bunch of snippets that contain parentheses galore with ellipses galore to create readability nil is the way it had to be done?
 
dooley_womack1 said:
And stringing together a bunch of snippets that contain parentheses galore with ellipses galore to create readability nil is the way it had to be done?

"Had to be done" has nothing to do with it. It's the way the writer, Michael Paterniti, chose to delve into a short profile about someone who has been written about thousands of times by thousands of people. Writers are hired to make choices. This was Paterniti's.

The minute we start editing the New York Times Sunday Magazine the way we edit USA Today is the minute I throw in the towell and spend the rest of my life tending bar.
 
Double Down said:
dooley_womack1 said:
And stringing together a bunch of snippets that contain parentheses galore with ellipses galore to create readability nil is the way it had to be done?

"Had to be done" has nothing to do with it. It's the way the writer, Michael Paterniti, chose to delve into a short profile about someone who has been written about thousands of times by thousands of people.

The minute we start editing the New York Times Sunday Magazine the way we edit USA Today is the minute I throw in the towell and spend the rest of my life tending bar.

Gotta admit, DD, that one lost me, too.
 
Double Down said:
dooley_womack1 said:
And stringing together a bunch of snippets that contain parentheses galore with ellipses galore to create readability nil is the way it had to be done?

"Had to be done" has nothing to do with it. It's the way the writer, Michael Paterniti, chose to delve into a short profile about someone who has been written about thousands of times by thousands of people. Writers are hired to make choices. This was Paterniti's.

The minute we start editing the New York Times Sunday Magazine the way we edit USA Today is the minute I throw in the towell and spend the rest of my life tending bar.

Overreact much? There are a few hundred intermediate steps between the two extremes you mention. And any damn magazine should be edited in a way that its contents can be read by, um, readers.
 
Agree with Zeke that I probably wouldn't try it, but I thought a wild, meandering, 407-word sentence was a pretty appropriate way to sum up a bat**** crazy guy.
 
In a totally unrelated manner, remind me never to click YouTube links in your tagline ever again.
 
To further BYH's point, Fischerian-level chess and madness both suggest a mind whose pathways don't mirror ours. It worked for me.
 
dooley_womack1 said:
In a totally unrelated manner, remind me never to click YouTube links in your tagline ever again.
Awww, I missed Prancing Billy. Good to see him again.
 
I thought it was pretty good, and I'm a reader, not a peer, but did he mean to say that Kissinger called him before he was 13?
 
For the record, I thought the lede was crap. Bend the rules, and it can be interesting. Stomp on them, it's unreadable (at least, to me).
 

Latest posts

Back
Top