NOW 2008 Gets Interesting!

[zeke12]

Bill, that was cogent and well argued.

Clearly, you're new to our political threads.

 

[steveu]

Ha ha. That was good.

FYI: When I was traveling in NW Illinois on the way to Minnesota for a Twins playoff game back in 2004, almost every yard sign was for Keyes. I didn't see many Obama signs at all. Two years later, in downstate Illinois the signs were almost all for Judy Topinka and I could count Blago's signs on both hands.

Chicago and its suburbs may be as blue as it gets in Illinois. I'd wager the rest of the state is pretty red. So Keyes might have a shot in other red areas. Not much of one, but a shot.

 

[jgmacg]

Vote Keyes: The Harold Stassen for the 21st Century.

 

[Fenian_Bastard]

I have to admit. He has the ability to frame an argument within rhetoric so handsome that you nearly -- NEARLY -- forget that thew argument itself is bat**** crazee.

 

[Pastor]

Wonderful. A bigot and Father-of-the-Year candidate enters the race for the GOP. I look forward to the rubbish dribbled forth.

 

[Mystery_Meat]

I've posted on this thread, but every time I look at the title, I think it's about next year's feminist convention.

 

[Fenian_Bastard]

You wish, Meat.

 

[Guy_Incognito]

I have to admit. He has the ability to frame an argument within rhetoric so handsome that you nearly -- NEARLY -- forget that thew argument itself is bat**** crazee.

Unfortunately for both parties, their most gifted speakers happen to be completely nuts, see Keyes, Buchanan, Sharpton.

 

[zeke12]

I really do miss Al Sharpton in the debates.

Who couldn't love his "flogging this donkey" performance from last time out?

 

[Fenian_Bastard]

I have to admit. He has the ability to frame an argument within rhetoric so handsome that you nearly -- NEARLY -- forget that thew argument itself is bat**** crazee.

Unfortunately for both parties, their most gifted speakers happen to be completely nuts, see Keyes, Buchanan, Sharpton.

Neither Buchanan nor Sharpton is crazy.
Keyes....

 

[RedSmithClone]

I have to admit. He has the ability to frame an argument within rhetoric so handsome that you nearly -- NEARLY -- forget that thew argument itself is bat**** crazee.

Unfortunately for both parties, their most gifted speakers happen to be completely nuts, see Keyes, Buchanan, Sharpton.

Neither Buchanan nor Sharpton is crazy.
Keyes....

Well I agree and disagree. Buchanan is most definitely NOT crazy. Hell I wish he would run for Pres again - I'd be carrying my pitchfork and torch.

Sharpton and Keyes . . . it depends on how you look at them. Both well spoken and both a little overzealous in their beliefs. But I don't think Sharpton could hold Keyes' jock in a debate.

 

[Fenian_Bastard]

It would be difficult because Keyes would likely be wearing his jock for earmuffs.

 

[RedSmithClone]

It would be difficult because Keyes would likely be wearing his jock for earmuffs.

Too funny

 

[Ben_Hecht]

I have to admit. He has the ability to frame an argument within rhetoric so handsome that you nearly -- NEARLY -- forget that thew argument itself is bat**** crazee.

Unfortunately for both parties, their most gifted speakers happen to be completely nuts, see Keyes, Buchanan, Sharpton.

Neither Buchanan nor Sharpton is crazy.
Keyes....

Well I agree and disagree. Buchanan is most definitely NOT crazy. Hell I wish he would run for Pres again - I'd be carrying my pitchfork and torch.

Sharpton and Keyes . . . it depends on how you look at them. Both well spoken and both a little overzealous in their beliefs. But I don't think Sharpton could hold Keyes' jock in a debate.

Alas, Pat's anti-Semitism will never play well if/when under the hottest of spotlights. He can get away with his jolly-good-fellow act in more congenial settings, but the act wouldn't last long on the biggest stage.

 

[RedSmithClone]

I have to admit. He has the ability to frame an argument within rhetoric so handsome that you nearly -- NEARLY -- forget that thew argument itself is bat**** crazee.

Unfortunately for both parties, their most gifted speakers happen to be completely nuts, see Keyes, Buchanan, Sharpton.

Neither Buchanan nor Sharpton is crazy.
Keyes....

Well I agree and disagree. Buchanan is most definitely NOT crazy. Hell I wish he would run for Pres again - I'd be carrying my pitchfork and torch.

Sharpton and Keyes . . . it depends on how you look at them. Both well spoken and both a little overzealous in their beliefs. But I don't think Sharpton could hold Keyes' jock in a debate.

Alas, Pat's anti-Semitism will never play well if/when under the hottest of spotlights. He can get away with his jolly-good-fellow act in more congenial settings, but the act wouldn't last long on the biggest stage.

Oh that's right. I forgot. Pat hates Jewish people. Give me a break with that bull crap!

 

[Guy_Incognito]

I have to admit. He has the ability to frame an argument within rhetoric so handsome that you nearly -- NEARLY -- forget that thew argument itself is bat**** crazee.

Unfortunately for both parties, their most gifted speakers happen to be completely nuts, see Keyes, Buchanan, Sharpton.

Neither Buchanan nor Sharpton is crazy.
Keyes....

Well I agree and disagree. Buchanan is most definitely NOT crazy. Hell I wish he would run for Pres again - I'd be carrying my pitchfork and torch.

Sharpton and Keyes . . . it depends on how you look at them. Both well spoken and both a little overzealous in their beliefs. But I don't think Sharpton could hold Keyes' jock in a debate.

Alas, Pat's anti-Semitism will never play well if/when under the hottest of spotlights. He can get away with his jolly-good-fellow act in more congenial settings, but the act wouldn't last long on the biggest stage.

Oh that's right. I forgot. Pat hates Jewish people. Give me a break with that bull crap!

Well, there's certainly a better case their than with Easterbrook.

 

[Bill Brasky]

William F. Buckley basically called Buchanan an anti-Semite years ago...and he's hardly a hysterical liberal.

 

[Ben_Hecht]

I have to admit. He has the ability to frame an argument within rhetoric so handsome that you nearly -- NEARLY -- forget that thew argument itself is bat**** crazee.

Unfortunately for both parties, their most gifted speakers happen to be completely nuts, see Keyes, Buchanan, Sharpton.

Neither Buchanan nor Sharpton is crazy.
Keyes....

Well I agree and disagree. Buchanan is most definitely NOT crazy. Hell I wish he would run for Pres again - I'd be carrying my pitchfork and torch.

Sharpton and Keyes . . . it depends on how you look at them. Both well spoken and both a little overzealous in their beliefs. But I don't think Sharpton could hold Keyes' jock in a debate.

Alas, Pat's anti-Semitism will never play well if/when under the hottest of spotlights. He can get away with his jolly-good-fellow act in more congenial settings, but the act wouldn't last long on the biggest stage.

Oh that's right. I forgot. Pat hates Jewish people. Give me a break with that bull crap!

Yes, indeedy, he and Nixon certainly enjoyed this common bond . . .

 

[zeke12]

Give me a break with that bull crap!

Hi Boots!

 

[Ben_Hecht]

An oldie but a goodie from Alan Greenspan (who will never be confused with Hillary Clinton), re Nixon, dredged up in this week's Newsweek:

" . . . You don't understand. He wasn't exclusively anti-Semitic. He was anti-Semitic, anti-Italian,
anti-Greek, anti-Slovak . . . he hated everybody."

And Pat wrote the songs.