NFL Week 13 Running Thread

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Did anyone else see that commercial for a Sci-Fi miniseries or whatever with Richard Dreyfuss?

Good Lord, someone needs a new agent.
 
Whaddya know, Aaron Rodgers is surprisingly fleet of foot. Hasn't thrown anything resembling a good pass yet, though.
 
Tramon Williams has replaced Bush. And Rodgers has the Packers in the red zone. One not a shock, one completely shocking.
 
I could be lucky, but is anybody else watching this one for free on NFL.com right now?
 
Collinsworth just noted that Junius Coston was in for Jason Spitz at guard, completely oblivous to the fact that Coston replaced Daryn Colledge (who was benched) the previous series and Spitz moved from left guard to right guard.
 
Norman Stansfield said:
Every bad feeling I had about Bryant Gumbel as a play-by-play guy heading into the evening has already been confirmed 10 times over.

The guy is ****ing brutal.
Gumbel was a big name but he never made his mark as a play-by-play guy. His first big job was the studio guy for NBC's pregame show long ago before going to Today. He had nothing to gain and a lot to lose by taking this job and he's obviously overmatched. I actually thought about feeling bad for him for a second, then I remembered he's a multi-millionaire.
 
I watched an Indiana State game with Bird on Classic, and I forget if it was Michigan State or Larry's near-perfect game against DePaul, but Bryant was the sideline reporter.

I didn't remember there ever being one back then, but there he was.
 
amraeder said:
hockeybeat said:
old_tony said:
Just reported on NFL Network: Woodson and Gbaja-Biamila out as inactives tonight for the Packers.
Two very big losses for the Pack. Woodson could have shut down Crayton while Harris manned up against Owens. And Gbaja-Biamila might have been able to get after Romo.

Not having Woodson will hurt. Their backup sucks giant hairy monkey balls.

I was at the bar watching until Dallas went up 27-10, and Woodson's presence wasn't going to be a make-or-break issue for the Packers unless Woodson was planning to go in and block on offensive plays. Woodson would have been useful against Owens, but he wasn't going to keep Favre off his ass.
 
old_tony said:
Norman Stansfield said:
Every bad feeling I had about Bryant Gumbel as a play-by-play guy heading into the evening has already been confirmed 10 times over.

The guy is ****ing brutal.
Gumbel was a big name but he never made his mark as a play-by-play guy. His first big job was the studio guy for NBC's pregame show long ago before going to Today. He had nothing to gain and a lot to lose by taking this job and he's obviously overmatched. I actually thought about feeling bad for him for a second, then I remembered he's a multi-millionaire.

he's also an insufferable ***** who let his mom live in squalor in the slums of Chicago. C'mon, anyone else subscribe to SI in 1988?

Oh and ****ing ****, Favre better come back. [/fantasy fanboylooooser]
 
2muchcoffeeman said:
amraeder said:
hockeybeat said:
old_tony said:
Just reported on NFL Network: Woodson and Gbaja-Biamila out as inactives tonight for the Packers.
Two very big losses for the Pack. Woodson could have shut down Crayton while Harris manned up against Owens. And Gbaja-Biamila might have been able to get after Romo.

Not having Woodson will hurt. Their backup sucks giant hairy monkey balls.

I was at the bar watching until Dallas went up 27-10, and Woodson's presence wasn't going to be a make-or-break issue for the Packers unless Woodson was planning to go in and block on offensive plays. Woodson would have been useful against Owens, but he wasn't going to keep Favre off his ass.

Woodson's replacement has given up two TDs. I'd say that is a make-or-break issue.

Even if Woodson gives up just one, the complexion of this game is still much different.
 
BYH said:
he's also an insufferable ***** who let his mom live in squalor in the slums of Chicago. C'mon, anyone else subscribe to SI in 1988?

So did he write about it in SI? What's the story there?

Re: the game, it's a shame to see the Cowboys scoring like this. I was really hoping they would lose tonight, and they won't with Rodgers having to rally the Pack.
 
Oz said:
BYH said:
he's also an insufferable ***** who let his mom live in squalor in the slums of Chicago. C'mon, anyone else subscribe to SI in 1988?

So did he write about it in SI? What's the story there?

Story about Gumbel's difficult nature...mentioned how his mother lived in a terrible area of Chicago and had to do all her shopping and stuff before 3 pm b/c no one wanted to be out in the area anywhere near dark. I think it ended with some vivid imagery of the woman sitting alone in her beaten-up apartment.
 
Well, it's not like Favre was lighting it up, exactly. Or has EVER won at Texas Stadium.
 
Norman Stansfield said:
2muchcoffeeman said:
amraeder said:
hockeybeat said:
old_tony said:
Just reported on NFL Network: Woodson and Gbaja-Biamila out as inactives tonight for the Packers.
Two very big losses for the Pack. Woodson could have shut down Crayton while Harris manned up against Owens. And Gbaja-Biamila might have been able to get after Romo.

Not having Woodson will hurt. Their backup sucks giant hairy monkey balls.

I was at the bar watching until Dallas went up 27-10, and Woodson's presence wasn't going to be a make-or-break issue for the Packers unless Woodson was planning to go in and block on offensive plays. Woodson would have been useful against Owens, but he wasn't going to keep Favre off his ass.

Woodson's replacement has given up two TDs. I'd say that is a make-or-break issue.

Even if Woodson gives up just one, the complexion of this game is still much different.

Honestly, I think Woodson would have given up two TDs as well.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top