March Madness poll

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Should the play-in game be scrapped?

  • Yes, it's a waste of time

    Votes: 31 77.5%
  • No, it's one last opportunity to make the dance. Leave it be.

    Votes: 9 22.5%

  • Total voters
    40
Keep it, but instead of making teams who earned their way in through automatic bids play, make the last two at-large teams have to play their way in. I'd much rather watch, say, Virginia Tech and Illinois play than Arkansas-Pine Bluff and Morgan State.
 
joe king said:
Keep it, but instead of making teams who earned their way in through automatic bids play, make the last two at-large teams have to play their way in. I'd much rather watch, say, Virginia Tech and Illinois play than Arkansas-Pine Bluff and Morgan State.

Quite right.

The play-in game is really the gateway drug to overexpansion.

But it would be fun to have one play-in for each pod ... if, as joe suggests, "name" teams were in the mix.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Football_Bat said:
When the illustrious Great West gets its automatic bid in three years, we'll likely have two play-ins unless the NCAA goes forward with the 96-team bracket.

I always get a laugh out of the grandiose names chosen by some of these backwater leagues. What exactly is big about the Big South?
 
spnited said:
And why does the Great West have a school from New Jersey?

Kind of like the Western Athletic Conference having a school from Louisiana.

Ah, who needs to teach geography anymore? Just use MapQuest ...
 
spnited said:
Illinois does not even deserve to be in a play-in

I think we should have four play in games every year. With the at-large teams.

This year you could have.

Florida vs. Minnesota
Illinois vs. Mississippi State
Utah vs. Virginia Tech
and so on.


I don't understand why there is one play-in game. I feel like brackets should be the same on each side.
 
I Should Coco said:
spnited said:
And why does the Great West have a school from New Jersey?

Kind of like the Western Athletic Conference having a school from Louisiana.

Ah, who needs to teach geography anymore? Just use MapQuest ...

Or the Sun Belt with a team from Colorado.
 
I thought this poll would be, "Who has the most annoying college basketball coverage, ESPN or CBS?"

Maybe we need a play-in game to determine THAT.
 
mustangj17 said:
spnited said:
Illinois does not even deserve to be in a play-in

I think we should have four play in games every year. With the at-large teams.

This year you could have.

Florida vs. Minnesota
Illinois vs. Mississippi State
Utah vs. Virginia Tech
and so on.


I don't understand why there is one play-in game. I feel like brackets should be the same on each side.


Eight teams who don't deserve to be in the tournament
 
I would expand the field to 68 teams - - but not to 96 teams - - and have a play-in game in each of the four brackets just to let a few more "wannabees" into the tournament.

It isn't about who is going to win it all; it is about giving three more teams a couple of days of eupohoria until the clock strikes twelve...
 
Why not just let all the wanabees in Jack. Oh, wait, they already are...in the conference tournaments.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top