BitterYoungMatador2
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2005
- Messages
- 21,364
We get the Baltimore stations where we live and they've already said removal of the old bridge is more complicated than they expected it to be.
In an effort to save time, I hope they find a suitable/similar set of designs that have been used in the last decade or so and start from there instead of trying in engineer something totally from scratch. Also, I'm pretty much on record as being an outdoor conservationist, but if you are building right back where the old one was, you can forego the environmental study.
First steps. Also, Ready Reserve military vessels there. Too bad it took a tragedy to do this. Thousands more decrepit bridges out there.
Every bridge is a little bit different, though, isn't it? You still have to account for factors specific to that location like currents, erosion, what type of soil you're driving the pilings into, obviously making it sturdy enough to withstand a hit, etc. You can look at the plans from the 1970s, but some of those variables might have changed in 50 years. I don't think it's like buying a kit.
My wife, who works for the Governor of Pennsylvania, and I, who clearly does not, have had an interesting debate over this. She had a front row seat for the Interstate 95 overpass collapse last summer, which was mended and reopened in less than three weeks. She believes a similar "all hands on deck" strategy will be applied and the Key bridge will be rebuilt within a year. I, ever the pessimist, think there's no effing way. Even if you remove all of the red tape (which I don't trust the Rand Pauls of the world to behave for), the redesign isn't going to be quick. Hell, the original bridge took five years to build.
Cut-and-dried
Bridge disaster ship's bridge, posted by Brooklyn Bridge.
This stuff will come out in dribs and drabs as the NTSB and its investigators see fit. As with most incidents of this scale, it's not just the one thing.
“Pork-laden.” Yeah. Legislation to rebuild a bridge, which inherently facilitates interstate commerce, is just a local, libruhl boondoggle. **** you.
And if he is? What, pray tell, is wrong with tacking on tangential work if it's necessary to ensure the long-term safety and viability of other bridges, roads, etc? His real problem -- this is on the Freedom Caucasians' letterhead -- is that it gave Biden a stage and it gives the fedruhl gubmint the opportunity to provide assistance in city and state that his klan hates because the state votes blue and the city is 60% Black.The bridge will cost, let's say, $1 billion to rebuild. Do you really think it will be part of a standalone bill?
How much you want to bet it's a small part of another massive "infrastructure" bill that includes hundreds of items that are not the Key Bridge, or any bridge for that matter?
I think (or like to think) that's at least part of what he's talking about.
And if he is? What, pray tell, is wrong with tacking on tangential work if it's necessary to ensure the long-term safety and viability of other bridges, roads, etc? His real problem -- this is on the Freedom Caucasians' letterhead -- is that it gave Biden a stage and it gives the fedruhl gubmint the opportunity to provide assistance in city and state that his klan hates because the state votes blue and the city is 60% Black.
Trumpists object to any disaster aid to libruhl states, parsing line by line for alleged waste. But when an SEC state gets devastated by a hurricane or a tornado, no philosophical objections get raised.
Any past examples you’d care to provide?Again, there is a very slim chance that any "infrastructure" bill that comes out of Congress actually spends all — or even most — of the money on "infrastructure."
That's the problem.
The Key Bridge obviously needs to be rebuilt. It should not be used as an excuse to add another couple trillion dollars in debt to the ledger.