Angola! said:MCbamr said:Texas Tech had nothing to play for, which is what bowl games are about.
I'm so tired of this argument.
These guys are competitors. They get paid to win, in a sense. If they don't have any desire to win, just because they aren't playing who they thought they should, then they were failures to begin with.
If they have competitive fire, they should want to win everything they play, no matter if it is the Cotton Bowl (which I guarantee was a big deal to athletes who play in Texas) or a ****ing game of Uno.
You might be tired of it but it's an accurate argument. Smart betters have made a lot of money over the years on that theory.