P
pallister
Guest
Ya, I'd have been pissed.
cathack said:This is a great thread.
I know I'm damn lucky to be where I'm at. But I'd like to think I've busted ass along the way and earned my position. Four years ago, I was desperately trying to find a job and took one basically doing below intern work. Now, I cover pro and college teams. I'm fortunate to be where I am, and many days, I love what I do.
I don't think I can be anything but than a writer/editor and dealing in sports. Neither does my wife. But those "other" days, where all you do is shovel **** for hours on end, only to get zero reward for your efforts, they take more and more out of me than they use to.
Last night was one of those nights. I almost walked out on my desk shift when my wife called to tell my our 2-year-old peed in his potty. Another milestone in his life I've missed and another moment where I wondered, and kind of wished I had a normal working life.
BitterYoungMatador2 said:cathack said:This is a great thread.
I know I'm damn lucky to be where I'm at. But I'd like to think I've busted ass along the way and earned my position. Four years ago, I was desperately trying to find a job and took one basically doing below intern work. Now, I cover pro and college teams. I'm fortunate to be where I am, and many days, I love what I do.
I don't think I can be anything but than a writer/editor and dealing in sports. Neither does my wife. But those "other" days, where all you do is shovel **** for hours on end, only to get zero reward for your efforts, they take more and more out of me than they use to.
Last night was one of those nights. I almost walked out on my desk shift when my wife called to tell my our 2-year-old peed in his potty. Another milestone in his life I've missed and another moment where I wondered, and kind of wished I had a normal working life.
**** like that will wear on you more and more as you get older.
Voodoo Chile said:I've gotten out of the business twice and was lucky enough to get back in. I found out the hard way there's nothing else I'd rather do.
Damaramu said:About the same. This was all in the last week or two that this happened.
I think part of my problem is that I already had my confidence shot in college. My student paper was full of assholes. Everyone put everyone else's writing down. They'd do it to your face or behind your back. Me and like two other people didn't do it. The night deskers were the worst. They'd tell us that editing our stories was like editing a 3-year olds writing.
Obviously I'm a better writer than that or I wouldn't have a job. Unfortunately, it does play with your head. So when you're in a situation where failure is very likely and you have shaky confidence in your abilities.....well that's just not good for growth and development as a writer!
Not to mention my publisher is an a-hole that doesn't help.
The other day "So I see XX wasn't around to edit your stories the other day was he?"
"No."
"Haha. It shows."
Then again he's a nitwit that has no journalistic background. If I gave him one of those things from an entry level journalism class "There's 50 mistakes in this story. Find them." He'd probably find 15. He just likes to be an a-hole. He does it to other people. He's constantly telling our pressman (who's done this since 1976) that he doesn't know what he's doing.
Just not good for growth. Surely every paper isn't like this is it?
Joe Williams said:Jims242 said:Let me apologize for the venom in my rant. Seriously, I do mean it.
Just the gloom and doom (and no, I'm not blind to way print is going) astounds me at times. It just bothers me to watch good talent leaving what they've always dreamed of doing.
Let's not overlook the fact that dreams generally end. You wake up in the morning, the dream is over. Or you chronicle the exploits of others in sporting pursuits for a decade or two, and then you've had enough. For five, 10 or 20 years, you enjoyed it enough to put up with all the sacrifices required. And the industry allowed you to hang onto some dignity.
Then one day, you're 20 years in to doing this and you start to feel a little dumb for chronicling the athletic deeds of people now somewhat or even much younger than you. The lack of payoff in terms of money or growth starts to bug you, and the sacrifices seem to increase, not lessen, the longer you stick with it. Maybe you have kids yourself and you realize that the great history and math students deserve the kudos as much or more than the jocks. Now overlay that with the panic of bottom-line obsessed managers, and the disrespect they're all too happy to dump on you and your colleagues.
At that point -- I feel bad for anyone who truly believes they "were born to do this and only this." That really is selling yourself short.
Piotr Rasputin said:Joe Williams said:Jims242 said:Let me apologize for the venom in my rant. Seriously, I do mean it.
Just the gloom and doom (and no, I'm not blind to way print is going) astounds me at times. It just bothers me to watch good talent leaving what they've always dreamed of doing.
Let's not overlook the fact that dreams generally end. You wake up in the morning, the dream is over. Or you chronicle the exploits of others in sporting pursuits for a decade or two, and then you've had enough. For five, 10 or 20 years, you enjoyed it enough to put up with all the sacrifices required. And the industry allowed you to hang onto some dignity.
Then one day, you're 20 years in to doing this and you start to feel a little dumb for chronicling the athletic deeds of people now somewhat or even much younger than you. The lack of payoff in terms of money or growth starts to bug you, and the sacrifices seem to increase, not lessen, the longer you stick with it. Maybe you have kids yourself and you realize that the great history and math students deserve the kudos as much or more than the jocks. Now overlay that with the panic of bottom-line obsessed managers, and the disrespect they're all too happy to dump on you and your colleagues.
At that point -- I feel bad for anyone who truly believes they "were born to do this and only this." That really is selling yourself short.
One of the best posts I have ever seen here.
High quality.
Tom Petty said:*** - since you asked, here's my experience: i've worked for several papers, alongside several co-workers. i've come to the conclusion that journalism is a mega draw for know-it-alls who believe they have the answer for nearly every question in life. journalists also tend to own above average IQs and generally are pretty good people.
those secure in their own abilities tend to make fun of their co-workers' writing in an attempt to bond, especially in sports for some reason. a large percentage of those who engage in that activity, also don't mind other folks giving their writing a verbal ****ing as well.
since i've become an editor, i've refused to make fun of anyone's writing because it just isn't professional. but when i was a writer, god damn i was merciless, but only with those who'd been in the business for a few years and were comfortable with their own product.
on the other hand, though, there's a few pricks out there in every shop who feel better about their lots in life if they can demean someone else's work. and yeah, it happens quite a bit.
as far as publishers go, here's the trick: get to a paper large enough where you never have to see or talk to the bastards.
if you're going to survive, you'll have to learn to trust one or two people who will help you grow as a writer and then extend your middle finger to the rest of the bunch. read that last line one more time ... it's the best advice i can give.
silentbob said:Deadends come at different points.
I spent 10 years getting to a destination paper. Now that I'm here -- one of the 10 largest in the country -- I make a little over $50,000 covering the biggest teams in town.
In a big city with 2 kids that doesnt go very far, which means here I am, at the top of my profession, living paycheck to paycheck. I love my job. One of the highlights of my day is reading the morning paper. But at some point you have to ask yourself: What is best for my family? With the industry tanking, I really don't see my salary jumping another 10 grand over the next seven, eight or nine years. And last I checked, the world's not getting any cheaper.
Doesnt leave one with a lot of options.
Tom Petty said:Damaramu said:About the same. This was all in the last week or two that this happened.
I think part of my problem is that I already had my confidence shot in college. My student paper was full of assholes. Everyone put everyone else's writing down. They'd do it to your face or behind your back. Me and like two other people didn't do it. The night deskers were the worst. They'd tell us that editing our stories was like editing a 3-year olds writing.
Obviously I'm a better writer than that or I wouldn't have a job. Unfortunately, it does play with your head. So when you're in a situation where failure is very likely and you have shaky confidence in your abilities.....well that's just not good for growth and development as a writer!
Not to mention my publisher is an a-hole that doesn't help.
The other day "So I see XX wasn't around to edit your stories the other day was he?"
"No."
"Haha. It shows."
Then again he's a nitwit that has no journalistic background. If I gave him one of those things from an entry level journalism class "There's 50 mistakes in this story. Find them." He'd probably find 15. He just likes to be an a-hole. He does it to other people. He's constantly telling our pressman (who's done this since 1976) that he doesn't know what he's doing.
Just not good for growth. Surely every paper isn't like this is it?
*** - since you asked, here's my experience: i've worked for several papers, alongside several co-workers. i've come to the conclusion that journalism is a mega draw for know-it-alls who believe they have the answer for nearly every question in life. journalists also tend to own above average IQs and generally are pretty good people.
those secure in their own abilities tend to make fun of their co-workers' writing in an attempt to bond, especially in sports for some reason. a large percentage of those who engage in that activity, also don't mind other folks giving their writing a verbal ****ing as well.
since i've become an editor, i've refused to make fun of anyone's writing because it just isn't professional. but when i was a writer, god damn i was merciless, but only with those who'd been in the business for a few years and were comfortable with their own product.
on the other hand, though, there's a few pricks out there in every shop who feel better about their lots in life if they can demean someone else's work. and yeah, it happens quite a bit.
as far as publishers go, here's the trick: get to a paper large enough where you never have to see or talk to the bastards.
if you're going to survive, you'll have to learn to trust one or two people who will help you grow as a writer and then extend your middle finger to the rest of the bunch. read that last line one more time ... it's the best advice i can give.
imjustagirl said:silentbob said:Deadends come at different points.
I spent 10 years getting to a destination paper. Now that I'm here -- one of the 10 largest in the country -- I make a little over $50,000 covering the biggest teams in town.
In a big city with 2 kids that doesnt go very far, which means here I am, at the top of my profession, living paycheck to paycheck. I love my job. One of the highlights of my day is reading the morning paper. But at some point you have to ask yourself: What is best for my family? With the industry tanking, I really don't see my salary jumping another 10 grand over the next seven, eight or nine years. And last I checked, the world's not getting any cheaper.
Doesnt leave one with a lot of options.
But what other field can you get into where you'll start at over $50K?
Barsuk said:Tom Petty said:*** - since you asked, here's my experience: i've worked for several papers, alongside several co-workers. i've come to the conclusion that journalism is a mega draw for know-it-alls who believe they have the answer for nearly every question in life. journalists also tend to own above average IQs and generally are pretty good people.
those secure in their own abilities tend to make fun of their co-workers' writing in an attempt to bond, especially in sports for some reason. a large percentage of those who engage in that activity, also don't mind other folks giving their writing a verbal ****ing as well.
since i've become an editor, i've refused to make fun of anyone's writing because it just isn't professional. but when i was a writer, god damn i was merciless, but only with those who'd been in the business for a few years and were comfortable with their own product.
on the other hand, though, there's a few pricks out there in every shop who feel better about their lots in life if they can demean someone else's work. and yeah, it happens quite a bit.
as far as publishers go, here's the trick: get to a paper large enough where you never have to see or talk to the bastards.
if you're going to survive, you'll have to learn to trust one or two people who will help you grow as a writer and then extend your middle finger to the rest of the bunch. read that last line one more time ... it's the best advice i can give.
God damn if I don't want to work for you more than anything right now, tomas.
Judge Smails would disagree.Joe Williams said:Jims242 said:Let me apologize for the venom in my rant. Seriously, I do mean it.
Just the gloom and doom (and no, I'm not blind to way print is going) astounds me at times. It just bothers me to watch good talent leaving what they've always dreamed of doing.
At that point -- I feel bad for anyone who truly believes they "were born to do this and only this." That really is selling yourself short.
Moderator1 said:Tom Petty said:Damaramu said:About the same. This was all in the last week or two that this happened.
I think part of my problem is that I already had my confidence shot in college. My student paper was full of assholes. Everyone put everyone else's writing down. They'd do it to your face or behind your back. Me and like two other people didn't do it. The night deskers were the worst. They'd tell us that editing our stories was like editing a 3-year olds writing.
Obviously I'm a better writer than that or I wouldn't have a job. Unfortunately, it does play with your head. So when you're in a situation where failure is very likely and you have shaky confidence in your abilities.....well that's just not good for growth and development as a writer!
Not to mention my publisher is an a-hole that doesn't help.
The other day "So I see XX wasn't around to edit your stories the other day was he?"
"No."
"Haha. It shows."
Then again he's a nitwit that has no journalistic background. If I gave him one of those things from an entry level journalism class "There's 50 mistakes in this story. Find them." He'd probably find 15. He just likes to be an a-hole. He does it to other people. He's constantly telling our pressman (who's done this since 1976) that he doesn't know what he's doing.
Just not good for growth. Surely every paper isn't like this is it?
*** - since you asked, here's my experience: i've worked for several papers, alongside several co-workers. i've come to the conclusion that journalism is a mega draw for know-it-alls who believe they have the answer for nearly every question in life. journalists also tend to own above average IQs and generally are pretty good people.
those secure in their own abilities tend to make fun of their co-workers' writing in an attempt to bond, especially in sports for some reason. a large percentage of those who engage in that activity, also don't mind other folks giving their writing a verbal ****ing as well.
since i've become an editor, i've refused to make fun of anyone's writing because it just isn't professional. but when i was a writer, god damn i was merciless, but only with those who'd been in the business for a few years and were comfortable with their own product.
on the other hand, though, there's a few pricks out there in every shop who feel better about their lots in life if they can demean someone else's work. and yeah, it happens quite a bit.
as far as publishers go, here's the trick: get to a paper large enough where you never have to see or talk to the bastards.
if you're going to survive, you'll have to learn to trust one or two people who will help you grow as a writer and then extend your middle finger to the rest of the bunch. read that last line one more time ... it's the best advice i can give.
Serious question, not trying to be an ass: How big a paper does it have to be? I just left a 200K (well, not that long ago - let's call it a 180K). Decent sized joint. I talked to the publisher more than I did the ME. Not complaining. I like the publisher. Just wondering at what level the pub. is beyond reach or makes him/herself that way.
Tom Petty said:Moderator1 said:Tom Petty said:Damaramu said:About the same. This was all in the last week or two that this happened.
I think part of my problem is that I already had my confidence shot in college. My student paper was full of assholes. Everyone put everyone else's writing down. They'd do it to your face or behind your back. Me and like two other people didn't do it. The night deskers were the worst. They'd tell us that editing our stories was like editing a 3-year olds writing.
Obviously I'm a better writer than that or I wouldn't have a job. Unfortunately, it does play with your head. So when you're in a situation where failure is very likely and you have shaky confidence in your abilities.....well that's just not good for growth and development as a writer!
Not to mention my publisher is an a-hole that doesn't help.
The other day "So I see XX wasn't around to edit your stories the other day was he?"
"No."
"Haha. It shows."
Then again he's a nitwit that has no journalistic background. If I gave him one of those things from an entry level journalism class "There's 50 mistakes in this story. Find them." He'd probably find 15. He just likes to be an a-hole. He does it to other people. He's constantly telling our pressman (who's done this since 1976) that he doesn't know what he's doing.
Just not good for growth. Surely every paper isn't like this is it?
*** - since you asked, here's my experience: i've worked for several papers, alongside several co-workers. i've come to the conclusion that journalism is a mega draw for know-it-alls who believe they have the answer for nearly every question in life. journalists also tend to own above average IQs and generally are pretty good people.
those secure in their own abilities tend to make fun of their co-workers' writing in an attempt to bond, especially in sports for some reason. a large percentage of those who engage in that activity, also don't mind other folks giving their writing a verbal ****ing as well.
since i've become an editor, i've refused to make fun of anyone's writing because it just isn't professional. but when i was a writer, god damn i was merciless, but only with those who'd been in the business for a few years and were comfortable with their own product.
on the other hand, though, there's a few pricks out there in every shop who feel better about their lots in life if they can demean someone else's work. and yeah, it happens quite a bit.
as far as publishers go, here's the trick: get to a paper large enough where you never have to see or talk to the bastards.
if you're going to survive, you'll have to learn to trust one or two people who will help you grow as a writer and then extend your middle finger to the rest of the bunch. read that last line one more time ... it's the best advice i can give.
Serious question, not trying to be an ass: How big a paper does it have to be? I just left a 200K (well, not that long ago - let's call it a 180K). Decent sized joint. I talked to the publisher more than I did the ME. Not complaining. I like the publisher. Just wondering at what level the pub. is beyond reach or makes him/herself that way.
again, moddy, that's from my experience. i'm sure it has plenty to do with personalities as well.
but, from my experience, pubs at larger circs spend more time working the business end of the game and/or more time on the golf course.