Garrard released by Jags

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Seattle didn't try too hard to throw games last year when it would have served them better than one-and-done in the playoffs.
 
I don't think Garrard is a bad QB, just average. Rather have him than Kerry Collins. Wonder if the Jags waited to release him until the Colts signed Collins.
 
BYH said:
There's a lot of teams that are going ot engage in Suck for Luck this year, even some that don't need a QB.

Buffalo
Cincinnati
Jacksonville
Indianapolis (OK maybe not but they're going to fall off the cliff)
Denver
Carolina
Seattle
San Francisco

December is going to be fugly as teams try to outsuck one another for the #1 draft pick.

I can't see Carolina trying to be that bad after they just spent the #1 on Newton. Not that they won't get there organically, but I don't see them making that kind of effort.

I can also see Oliver Luck pulling an Archie Manning and keeping his son away from half of the teams on that list.
 
TheSportsPredictor said:
Seattle didn't try too hard to throw games last year when it would have served them better than one-and-done in the playoffs.

They were so bad they didn't have to try. Margins of defeat: 17, 17, 30, 34, 15, 18, 19, 16, 23. Their closest loss was in the playoffs (11 to the Bears). The worst playoff team ever in any sport.
 
Michael_ Gee said:
I don't think Garrard is a bad QB, just average. Rather have him than Kerry Collins. Wonder if the Jags waited to release him until the Colts signed Collins.

That's what I thought when I first saw this on ESPN. They might not have wanted to risk him signing with a team in the division.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
PirateSports said:
Dave is a great guy...knew him well in college. I wouldn't be surprised to see him emerge as a backup in Tampa for a year and then move on somewhere else. His college coach, Steve Logan, is on the staff in Tampa and they're still great friends...and Dave and Freeman are very similar.

I could see this. David Garrard is a big upgrade over Josh Johnson, and certainly he could help Josh Freeman.

If the Panthers didn't have enough faith in Derek Anderson - yeah, yeah ... insert your own joke here - he might be a good fit in Charlotte. But it's obvious Carolina is pushing all its chips to the middle and playing Cam Newton now.

Interesting the manner in which David Garrard won and lost the starting job in Jacksonville were similar. Somewhere, Byron Leftwich isn't the first bit surprised.
 
Flying Headbutt said:
Will the money saved help cover moving costs when they head to LA?

Nine million dollars tends to help cover a lot of moving expenses.
 
Sam Mills 51 said:
PirateSports said:
Dave is a great guy...knew him well in college. I wouldn't be surprised to see him emerge as a backup in Tampa for a year and then move on somewhere else. His college coach, Steve Logan, is on the staff in Tampa and they're still great friends...and Dave and Freeman are very similar.

I could see this. David Garrard is a big upgrade over Josh Johnson, and certainly he could help Josh Freeman.

If the Panthers didn't have enough faith in Derek Anderson - yeah, yeah ... insert your own joke here - he might be a good fit in Charlotte. But it's obvious Carolina is pushing all its chips to the middle and playing Cam Newton now.

Interesting the manner in which David Garrard won and lost the starting job in Jacksonville were similar. Somewhere, Byron Leftwich isn't the first bit surprised.

If Tampa gets Garrard I wonder if the 49ers will get Josh Johnson. They supposedly were interested in him since he was a QB for Harbaugh in San Diego but Tampa thought he had value as a backup.

Another option could be Miami.
 
LongTimeListener said:
BYH said:
There's a lot of teams that are going ot engage in Suck for Luck this year, even some that don't need a QB.

Buffalo
Cincinnati
Jacksonville
Indianapolis (OK maybe not but they're going to fall off the cliff)
Denver
Carolina
Seattle
San Francisco

December is going to be fugly as teams try to outsuck one another for the #1 draft pick.

I can't see Carolina trying to be that bad after they just spent the #1 on Newton. Not that they won't get there organically, but I don't see them making that kind of effort.

I lumped Carolina in with Cincy--teams that won't try to tank for the no. 1 pick since they already have their "franchise QB" (I put that in quotes b/c I think Newton and Dalton are going to suck) and might get there on merit. Denver will probably just be bad, instead of historically so, but if they were 1-11 in early December I could see Elway wanting to finish dead last just to get Luck.
 
The problem with assuming Seattle and San Francisco are going to be in the race for Luck is that they're in the same division. They have to play each other twice, plus, they each have four games against two other teams which remind no one of the 1966 Packers. They could stink and still win 4-5 games. My money's on the Bengals in this anti-shootout. And then America would totally pull for Luck if he staged an Eli Manning or Elway-like draft refusal.
 
As a Jaguars fan, this upset me this afternoon. If Del Rio actually starts Luke McCown even one game this year, he's already giving up.
 
Michael_ Gee said:
The problem with assuming Seattle and San Francisco are going to be in the race for Luck is that they're in the same division. They have to play each other twice, plus, they each have four games against two other teams which remind no one of the 1966 Packers. They could stink and still win 4-5 games. My money's on the Bengals in this anti-shootout. And then America would totally pull for Luck if he staged an Eli Manning or Elway-like draft refusal.

Seattle and San Francisco meet in week 16 on Christmas Eve. If they both still have a shot at No. 1 this could be the most entertaining game of the season.
 
Sam Mills 51 said:
Interesting the manner in which David Garrard won and lost the starting job in Jacksonville were similar. Somewhere, Byron Leftwich isn't the first bit surprised.

Ask not for whom the bell tolls, Blaine Gabbert...
 
I don't know if the Jags would have gotten $9 mil worth of performance from Garrard, and I doubt his release will cost the team $9 mil in ticket sales - but I think they could have gotten something out of him in a trade.
Maybe McCown has a better relationship with Gabbert.

But really - the problem the Jags have isn't the $9 mil - it is the rest of the roster. And I know there is a parallel between now and when Leftwich got axed, the difference is Garrard hadn't proven he couldn't lead a team - McCown? Eighth year, nine Tds, 10 Ints.

I'm still trying to figure if the move was Del Rio's attempt to save his job, or show other owners that he's willing to take a hit for their bottom line.

I guess good news for Texans fans.
 
BYH said:
Maybe that'll help sell out the home opener in the best market in football! LOLz. Where's the clown who cries every time someone declares Jacksonville is a ****ty market for pro football? Then again he tends to be awfully quiet whenever the facts once again kick his ass.

http://www.bizjournals.com/jacksonville/print-edition/2011/08/26/jaguars-tv-blackouts-are-likely-to.html

http://www.news4jax.com/news/29028318/detail.html
Here's right here and you wouldn't know a fact if it bit you. Some of us have real jobs where we can't play kindergarten cop on SportsJournalists.com.
And you're the one throwing this out first, so you can somehow blame for for "obsessing" about you. I know it's a blow to your ego but I really don't.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top