TheSportsPredictor
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2004
- Messages
- 32,934
Seattle didn't try too hard to throw games last year when it would have served them better than one-and-done in the playoffs.
BYH said:There's a lot of teams that are going ot engage in Suck for Luck this year, even some that don't need a QB.
Buffalo
Cincinnati
Jacksonville
Indianapolis (OK maybe not but they're going to fall off the cliff)
Denver
Carolina
Seattle
San Francisco
December is going to be fugly as teams try to outsuck one another for the #1 draft pick.
thegrifter said:Why not just send an email to fans saying, 'we have no intention of winning now.'
TheSportsPredictor said:Seattle didn't try too hard to throw games last year when it would have served them better than one-and-done in the playoffs.
Michael_ Gee said:I don't think Garrard is a bad QB, just average. Rather have him than Kerry Collins. Wonder if the Jags waited to release him until the Colts signed Collins.
PirateSports said:Dave is a great guy...knew him well in college. I wouldn't be surprised to see him emerge as a backup in Tampa for a year and then move on somewhere else. His college coach, Steve Logan, is on the staff in Tampa and they're still great friends...and Dave and Freeman are very similar.
Flying Headbutt said:Will the money saved help cover moving costs when they head to LA?
Sam Mills 51 said:PirateSports said:Dave is a great guy...knew him well in college. I wouldn't be surprised to see him emerge as a backup in Tampa for a year and then move on somewhere else. His college coach, Steve Logan, is on the staff in Tampa and they're still great friends...and Dave and Freeman are very similar.
I could see this. David Garrard is a big upgrade over Josh Johnson, and certainly he could help Josh Freeman.
If the Panthers didn't have enough faith in Derek Anderson - yeah, yeah ... insert your own joke here - he might be a good fit in Charlotte. But it's obvious Carolina is pushing all its chips to the middle and playing Cam Newton now.
Interesting the manner in which David Garrard won and lost the starting job in Jacksonville were similar. Somewhere, Byron Leftwich isn't the first bit surprised.
LongTimeListener said:BYH said:There's a lot of teams that are going ot engage in Suck for Luck this year, even some that don't need a QB.
Buffalo
Cincinnati
Jacksonville
Indianapolis (OK maybe not but they're going to fall off the cliff)
Denver
Carolina
Seattle
San Francisco
December is going to be fugly as teams try to outsuck one another for the #1 draft pick.
I can't see Carolina trying to be that bad after they just spent the #1 on Newton. Not that they won't get there organically, but I don't see them making that kind of effort.
Flying Headbutt said:Will the money saved help cover moving costs when they head to LA?
Michael_ Gee said:The problem with assuming Seattle and San Francisco are going to be in the race for Luck is that they're in the same division. They have to play each other twice, plus, they each have four games against two other teams which remind no one of the 1966 Packers. They could stink and still win 4-5 games. My money's on the Bengals in this anti-shootout. And then America would totally pull for Luck if he staged an Eli Manning or Elway-like draft refusal.
Sam Mills 51 said:Interesting the manner in which David Garrard won and lost the starting job in Jacksonville were similar. Somewhere, Byron Leftwich isn't the first bit surprised.
Here's right here and you wouldn't know a fact if it bit you. Some of us have real jobs where we can't play kindergarten cop on SportsJournalists.com.BYH said:Maybe that'll help sell out the home opener in the best market in football! LOLz. Where's the clown who cries every time someone declares Jacksonville is a ****ty market for pro football? Then again he tends to be awfully quiet whenever the facts once again kick his ass.
http://www.bizjournals.com/jacksonville/print-edition/2011/08/26/jaguars-tv-blackouts-are-likely-to.html
http://www.news4jax.com/news/29028318/detail.html