Facebook v. Myspace

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhilaYank36
  • Start date Start date
Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Which one do you prefer?

  • Facebook

    Votes: 30 49.2%
  • Myspace

    Votes: 13 21.3%
  • both

    Votes: 7 11.5%
  • neither

    Votes: 6 9.8%
  • I only visit SJ.com

    Votes: 5 8.2%

  • Total voters
    61
Flash said:
Well, crap, how do I get to it then? Or do I ever? Do I just revel in the glory that I'm a member?

Go to your groups link on your homepage. It'll show up then.
 
There's another one...called sportsjournalists.com is my addiction and it's public. I don't necessarily think it's outing just like the myspace group isn't. You chose to add yourself. You chose to determine if you want others knowing someone by your name posts on myspace or facebook.
 
I prefer MySpace, but Fabebook is good as well.

MySpace is the king, and has improved greatly since NewsCorp purchased it.
 
RokSki said:
I prefer MySpace, but Fabebook is good as well.

MySpace is the king, and has improved greatly since NewsCorp purchased it.

Of course. You can't have 1,100 porn stars and spammers as friends on Facebook, you vapid waste of space.
 
Here's a short blog post on the subject of MySpace vs Facebook which uses statistics from earlier in 2007 to compare the two social network services:

http://gigaom.com/2007/07/11/facebook-vs-myspace-the-tale-of-the-tape/


In the data the blog uses, MySpace leads in unique visitors/month and page views/month by a multiple of about '3X' that of Facebook.

I know I'm likely biased because I have about 1200 more friends on MySpace than I do on Facebook, but I still far prefer MySpace. The numbers suggest I'm in pretty good company in that preference, despite the excellent gains which Facebook has made.
 
The Good Doctor said:
RokSki said:
I prefer MySpace, but Fabebook is good as well.

MySpace is the king, and has improved greatly since NewsCorp purchased it.

Of course. You can't have 1,100 porn stars and spammers as friends on Facebook, you vapid waste of space.

Zing!
 
sportschick said:
Stan is a vapid waste of space. He's much more "with it" than the unemployed one.

Hey, not all of us are cool enough to be employed!
 
RokSki said:
Here's a short blog post on the subject of MySpace vs Facebook which uses statistics from earlier in 2007 to compare the two social network services:

http://gigaom.com/2007/07/11/facebook-vs-myspace-the-tale-of-the-tape/


In the data the blog uses, MySpace leads in unique visitors/month and page views/month by a multiple of about '3X' that of Facebook.

I know I'm likely biased because I have about 1200 more friends on MySpace than I do on Facebook, but I still far prefer MySpace. The numbers suggest I'm in pretty good company in that preference, despite the excellent gains which Facebook has made.

Yes because it's always quanity over quality, right? Facebook isn't a waste of space like MySpace, which is slow, tough to navigate and filled with jackasses spamming the **** out of you. I'll take facebook over myspace any day.
 
sportschick said:
Flash said:
And cuddlier ... I'd even cuddle a cat before I hit that ...

He wants your number. He likes to cuddle with women with awesome shoes!

Oh did I brag about my find of awesomeness? Chocolate-brown suede Mary Jane 2.5-in. heels. Clearance section. 15 dollahs! Holla!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top