Coaches rank Ohio State No. 1 and Texas No. 2

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Chuck~Taylor

Active Member
Joined
May 30, 2006
Messages
5,422
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=2539278

And don't forget, YOU HAVE TO LOOK AT THE SCHE-GULE GUYS! They both meet in week 2. [/woody paige]
 
After looking at that poll, I think people are overlooking West Virginia again.
 
Oz said:
After looking at that poll, I think people are overlooking West Virginia again.

Yeah, they're definitley a top 5 team. I also think that Notre Dame should've been ranked higher than USC.
 
No way in hell Texas is the second-best team in the nation. Not without a QB who hasn't taken one snap and Ramonce Taylor smoking out somewhere. Nor is USC the third-best, unless Booty reincarnates into Carson Palmer.

Notre Dame is probably about right, as is Ohio State. (Interestingly, the Domers end the regular season at USC on the Saturday after Turkey Day.)

OU was probably rated a little high before Bomar was booted, but now they certainly are. My prediction: Thompson will last the first game against UAB, and the first half of the Washington game before he gets pulled.

I can't really quibble with the rest, but I think Texas Tech is a sleeper. TCU vs. Tech is gonna be a treat.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Inky, you've just hit on the crux of a wonderful debate. Is the preseason poll a measure of where the teams are now? If so, on what is that based? How spring practice went?

Or are the polls projections of how they will finish?

I know writers who say it's a prediction, and I know other writers who say it's a measure of where they are now.
 
Johnny Dangerously said:
Inky, you've just hit on the crux of a wonderful debate. Is the preseason poll a measure of where the teams are now? If so, on what is that based? How spring practice went?

Or are the polls projections of how they will finish?

I know writers who say it's a prediction, and I know other writers who say it's a measure of where they are now.

When I've done basketball polls in the past, I've always voted based on how I think teams will finish. Isn't that also the point of preseason All-American teams?
 
Gotta parrot Colin Cowherd here: Iowa's schedule is cake; they'll finish in the Top 5.
 
Football_Bat said:
Of course this was the coaches' poll, which really becomes the SIDs' poll because coaches tend to be busy this time of year. ;)

Good point. Besides, I lost what little respect I had for the coaches' poll when said coaches gave Tom Osborne a retirement present that was worth so much more than just a gold watch in 1997.
 
Inky_Wretch said:
Johnny~Legend said:
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=2539278

And don't forget, YOU HAVE TO LOOK AT THE SCHE-GULE GUYS! They both meet in week 2. [/woody paige]

What does the future schedule have to do with where teams are ranked right now?

It dosn't. I'm just mentioning that they're going to meet.
 
Oz said:
Football_Bat said:
Of course this was the coaches' poll, which really becomes the SIDs' poll because coaches tend to be busy this time of year. ;)

Good point. Besides, I lost what little respect I had for the coaches' poll when said coaches gave Tom Osborne a retirement present that was worth so much more than just a gold watch in 1997.

I still get angry about that. I went off on that for 5 minutes straight about a month ago at a bar when somebody brought up the '97 Michigan team. I was pounding my fist on the table and yelling and ****.
 
How about Penn State at No. 17? That seems like a favor to Joe Pa.

Now, as a fan I'm pleased but I also live in the real world. Their schedule is a complete 180 of what it was last season. Penn State's first seven games include road games against Notre Dame, Ohio State, Minnesota, and a home tilt with Michigan. Brutal.

Throwing in my two cents, I think Alabama struggles this season without a steady signal caller. I'd bet on Iowa to finish in the top five. And I also am ready to believe in Nebraska again especially with 13 starters back.
 
Football_Bat said:
(Interestingly, the Domers end the regular season at USC on the Saturday after Turkey Day.)

Yeah, they've never done that before.
 
Overrated said:
Oz said:
Football_Bat said:
Of course this was the coaches' poll, which really becomes the SIDs' poll because coaches tend to be busy this time of year. ;)

Good point. Besides, I lost what little respect I had for the coaches' poll when said coaches gave Tom Osborne a retirement present that was worth so much more than just a gold watch in 1997.

I still get angry about that. I went off on that for 5 minutes straight about a month ago at a bar when somebody brought up the '97 Michigan team. I was pounding my fist on the table and yelling and ****. 

Good job, Mr. Unbiased.
 
DyePack said:
Overrated said:
Oz said:
Football_Bat said:
Of course this was the coaches' poll, which really becomes the SIDs' poll because coaches tend to be busy this time of year. ;)

Good point. Besides, I lost what little respect I had for the coaches' poll when said coaches gave Tom Osborne a retirement present that was worth so much more than just a gold watch in 1997.

I still get angry about that. I went off on that for 5 minutes straight about a month ago at a bar when somebody brought up the '97 Michigan team. I was pounding my fist on the table and yelling and ****. 

Good job, Mr. Unbiased.

I'm no longer a Michigan fan, in fact, you could say I hate Michigan, but that was bull****. Any way you wanna slice it.
 
Johnny Dangerously said:
Inky, you've just hit on the crux of a wonderful debate. Is the preseason poll a measure of where the teams are now? If so, on what is that based? How spring practice went?

Or are the polls projections of how they will finish?

I know writers who say it's a prediction, and I know other writers who say it's a measure of where they are now.

I've always taken it to be an interpretation of how they finished last year, with a sprinkle of thought (but not terribly much, see Texas, No. 2) about who they lost. In other words, guesswork. But unfortunately influential guesswork, b/c if you don't start in the top 10 it's pretty damn hard to get into the top two.
I know it'll never happen, but am I the only one who thinks they should do away with polls until, say, the first week of October?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top