Best. Tabloid. Front. Ever.

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

wicked

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2008
Messages
16,504
City & State/Province
Northeast
End the competition right here, folks, this tops "he took it in the butt."

Osama-Bin-Wankin-1305562875.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
BTW, I'm not buying that they didn't have cable/satellite tv.

One of the clips they showed had him watching Claire McCaskill presiding over the Senate on C-Span.

Someone taped that for him and brought it to him? That's pure channel surfing.

And, this picture clearly shows a satellite dish:

bin-laden-compound.jpg%3Fw%3D620%26h%3D350
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Point of Order said:
Pretty good. The Mets beating the Astros is what puts it over the top.

Actually, "Debbie Does Abbottabod" on the TV screen is a nice touch as well ...
 
BTW, I'm not buying that they didn't have cable/satellite tv.

Had no internet or phone lines connected.

Don't remember reading anything about him not having satellite TV. And you can still have a satellite sitting in your yard but not have it connected. Or maybe nobody actually knows what he was connected to.
 
I'm wondering who at CIA gets to review the entirety of the porn stash to make sure there are no secret encoded messages.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
YF, don't recall it ever being said that he didn't have TV service. Chalk up the TV-less rumor to shoddy reporting.
 
wicked said:
End the competition right here, folks, this tops "he took it in the butt."

NY_NYP.jpg

Before I clicked on this I thought, it can't be better than "He Took It In The Butt"

I was wrong.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think the CIA should release to porn to verify that story is not made up in effort to spoil the Osama legacy.
 
Steak Snabler said:
Point of Order said:
Pretty good. The Mets beating the Astros is what puts it over the top.

Actually, "Debbie Does Abbottabod" on the TV screen is a nice touch as well ...

Indeed. Any amateur could've come up with Osama bin Wankin'. It's the tv screen and the Whora Bora subhed that make this a master(burtory) piece.
 
NY_DN.jpg


If you're looking at those two options on a news stand, the Post wins easily. I don't live in New York anymore, but I feel like the Post has really moved well past the Daily News these days.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Versatile said:
If you're looking at those two options on a news stand, the Post wins easily.

Just out of curiosity, why? Regular readers know that on non-local stories, neither paper's heds are usually indicative of what their respective stories (rewritten from the wires) will deliver. I don't believe it has significant effect on buying choices unless you are a tourist. If I've been burned before and I've already seen today's attempt at humor on the newsstand, why would I need to pay to see what's inside? I know from seeing the cover that the newspaper has, well, already shot its wad. I think they are playing to their established niche, not taking readers away from anyone else when they do this stuff.
 
You've got to love terrorists. They don't believe the porn story. Why? Because bin Laden was a sacred warrior. No problem with him killing thousands, but apparently they would draw the line with some skin mags?
 
doubledown68 said:
Steak Snabler said:
Point of Order said:
Pretty good. The Mets beating the Astros is what puts it over the top.

Actually, "Debbie Does Abbottabod" on the TV screen is a nice touch as well ...

Indeed. Any amateur could've come up with Osama bin Wankin'. It's the tv screen and the Whora Bora subhed that make this a master(burtory) piece.

As I said on the thread in Sports and News, I would have given anything to be in on the meeting with the editors on this one. So many things make this an epic cover.
 
And with that I am nuking my thread on Sports & News. I should have known it was already covered. I didn't look hard. As I said, one of their best three ever and that is very high praise.
 
Frank_Ridgeway said:
Versatile said:
If you're looking at those two options on a news stand, the Post wins easily.

Just out of curiosity, why? Regular readers know that on non-local stories, neither paper's heds are usually indicative of what their respective stories (rewritten from the wires) will deliver. I don't believe it has significant effect on buying choices unless you are a tourist. If I've been burned before and I've already seen today's attempt at humor on the newsstand, why would I need to pay to see what's inside? I know from seeing the cover that the newspaper has, well, already shot its wad. I think they are playing to their established niche, not taking readers away from anyone else when they do this stuff.

I disagree completely. With exceptions like this, the cover is rarely the best thing in the paper. It's the little one-column heds that I wonder how they come up with anything that blow my mind. It's the spreads. It's the big sports stories. There's nothing about the Post that has "shot its wad."
 
doubledown68 said:
Steak Snabler said:
Point of Order said:
Pretty good. The Mets beating the Astros is what puts it over the top.

Actually, "Debbie Does Abbottabod" on the TV screen is a nice touch as well ...

Indeed. Any amateur could've come up with Osama bin Wankin'. It's the tv screen and the Whora Bora subhed that make this a master(burtory) piece.

I'm not sure about that. The beauty of the headline is that "Osama bin (fill in the blank)" has been low-hanging fruit for headline writers ever since he got capped.

But the Post held back and waited for the just the right moment and, voila!, we have hilarity.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top