161-2. 104-1 at the half.
http://www.sbsun.com/sports/2015010...ut-bloomington-161-2-sportsmanship-questioned
“I didn’t play any starters in the second half,” said Anderson, who guided Rialto to the Division II state finals in 2011 before coming to Arroyo Valley before the 2013-14 season. “I didn’t expect them (Bloomington) to be that bad, I’m not trying to embarrass anybody. And I didn’t expect my bench to play that well. I had one (bench) player make eight of nine 3s.”
Riiiiight.
161-2. 104-1 at the half.
http://www.sbsun.com/sports/2015010...ut-bloomington-161-2-sportsmanship-questioned
“I didn’t play any starters in the second half,” said Anderson, who guided Rialto to the Division II state finals in 2011 before coming to Arroyo Valley before the 2013-14 season. “I didn’t expect them (Bloomington) to be that bad, I’m not trying to embarrass anybody. And I didn’t expect my bench to play that well. I had one (bench) player make eight of nine 3s.”
Riiiiight.
Sure is. No need to be shooting all those 3s against a defenseless team.See, I'm all for the "get better or quit" mentality, but who the **** allows their team to shoot "eight of nine" 3-pointers in the second half with that lead?
That's just bull****.
He had all bench players in and these bench players may not get many chances to play. Why should they be harnessed and told not to play?Sure is. No need to be shooting all those 3s against a defenseless team.
If there is any mercy- rule provision dealing with margin of score, it should be automatic -- once the margin hits 30 or whatever, the clock runs; nobody can decide to accept or decline it. No ****- measuring pride contest (I won't ask for mercy; I wont grant it until you ask, etc etc), simple arithmetic.I'll say this too if the story is correct: shame on the officials who wouldn't go to a running clock in the third quarter.
I understand that but to score that many points in a game composed of 8-minute quarters seems overboard. It smacks of running up the score.He had all bench players in and these bench players may not get many chances to play. Why should they be harnessed and told not to play?
See, I'm all for the "get better or quit" mentality, but who the **** allows their team to shoot "eight of nine" 3-pointers in the second half with that lead?
That's just bull****.
He had all bench players in and these bench players may not get many chances to play. Why should they be harnessed and told not to play?
So the backups of Team A don't get to really play basketball, they have to play a dumbed-down, dialed-back version of it, because Team B sucks?Common decency.
So the backups of Team A don't get to really play basketball, they have to play a dumbed-down, dialed-back version of it, because Team B sucks?