Will a court offer its 2 cents on 50 Cent?

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
TheSportsPredictor said:
dooley_womack1 said:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080409/media_nm/newyork50cent_lawsuit_dc

Suit filed on behalf of 14-year-old boy against 50 Cent, his music company and other labels for promoting a lifestyle that the plaintiff contends led to the kid being beaten up.

It's actually friends of 50 Cent who roughed up the kid.

That, however, isn't what the lawsuit is about.

The lawsuit filed by James Rosemond and his mother, Cynthia Reed, says Universal Music Group -- owned by Vivendi SA -- and its labels Interscope Records, G-Unit Records and Shady Records, bear responsibility for the assault because they encourage artists to pursue violent, criminal lifestyles.

Kid could sue the other two for assault. He could sue 50 Cent if he could establish a preponderance of the evidence that 50 Cent told them to assault him.

Suing for "promoting a gangsta lifestyle?" Dismissed.
 
bigpern23 said:
TheSportsPredictor said:
dooley_womack1 said:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080409/media_nm/newyork50cent_lawsuit_dc

Suit filed on behalf of 14-year-old boy against 50 Cent, his music company and other labels for promoting a lifestyle that the plaintiff contends led to the kid being beaten up.

It's actually friends of 50 Cent who roughed up the kid.

That, however, isn't what the lawsuit is about.

The thread is being sold as if it is just some random kids influenced by listening to rap records.

They are employees and friends of 50 Cent and Universal who supposedly roughed up the kid because he supported a business rival.
 
TheSportsPredictor said:
bigpern23 said:
TheSportsPredictor said:
dooley_womack1 said:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080409/media_nm/newyork50cent_lawsuit_dc

Suit filed on behalf of 14-year-old boy against 50 Cent, his music company and other labels for promoting a lifestyle that the plaintiff contends led to the kid being beaten up.

It's actually friends of 50 Cent who roughed up the kid.

That, however, isn't what the lawsuit is about.

The thread is being sold as if it is just some random kids influenced by listening to rap records.

They are employees and friends of 50 Cent and Universal who supposedly roughed up the kid because he supported a business rival.

I'll repeat:
The lawsuit filed by James Rosemond and his mother, Cynthia Reed, says Universal Music Group -- owned by Vivendi SA -- and its labels Interscope Records, G-Unit Records and Shady Records, bear responsibility for the assault because they encourage artists to pursue violent, criminal lifestyles.

That is what is being stated in the lawsuit. That argument will never hold up in court.

Kid alleges that 50 Cent ordered Yayo and whoever to beat him up because he supported a business rival? That might have some legs (if he has any evidence to back it up).

Kid alleges that the assault happened because Universal Media Group is "promoting a gangsta lifestyle" is never going to hold water in court of law. First Amendment and all that.
 
Also in the article:

The lawsuit claims Rosemond was targeted because he was wearing a T-shirt by Czar Entertainment, a management company that represents The Game. The Game is a former G-Unit rapper who fell out with the group and had become a rival rapper.

The other charge is bull**** thrown against the wall that should be laughed at and thrown out of court the second the morons show up to file it. You are right, the argument will never stand up in court. It won't even be heard in court.
 
TheSportsPredictor said:
Also in the article:

The lawsuit claims Rosemond was targeted because he was wearing a T-shirt by Czar Entertainment, a management company that represents The Game. The Game is a former G-Unit rapper who fell out with the group and had become a rival rapper.

The other charge is bull**** thrown against the wall that should be laughed at and thrown out of court the second the morons show up to file it. You are right, the argument will never stand up in court. It won't even be heard in court.

That charge is one the kid could hope to win with (again, with evidence, yada, yada).

Basically, though, the kid's lawyer is hoping to get an out-of-court settlement for more than he deserves for simply taking a beating.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top