Who do you vote for?

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

I think Gore is a loser. If you can't win your home state, you can't win the election. However, I'm not counting him out of the race just yet.
Anyway, it doesn't matter. If the Dems truly want to win, they'll put together a Rodham-Clinton/Obama ticket.
And if Hillary doesn't pick Obama, she'll win it going away. Unless Bubba does something stupid like pull out his pecker for a buff and wax while she's giving a speech.
 
I will be surprised if Gore doesn't run because the one issue he's been passionate about since the beginning of his political career is so mainstream now. Going green, etc, is such a widespread topic now-- when he talks about these issues, people won't be nodding off (for once)...

oh, that and everything he's said about Bush and co for the past 7 years has been right on the money....
 
I think Gore is a loser. If you can't win your home state, you can't win the election.

Why do people keep falling back to this completely nonsensical line?

Gore was 538 pretty ****ing questionable Florida votes from winning the election (and more than overcoming his losing Tennessee), so it seems pretty damn obvious that you CAN lose your home state and still win the election. It just didn't happen in 2000.

Hell, it's more likely a candidate will lose his home state and win the election than it is a candidate will lose the popular vote and win the election. And we know the latter happened in 2000.

Mitt Romney has ZERO chance of winning Masachusetts. Should he just give up? Edwards likely would lose North Carolina. Should he just give up?

And what defines a "home state" anyway? Gore wasn't running as a senator from Tennessee. He was running as the sitting Vice President of the United States who happened to spend a few years as a Tennessee senator a LOOOONG time before the 2000 election. What is Hillary's home state, Arkansas or New York?
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
I'll vote for whoever the libertarian candidate is as I always do.

And I will urge my conservative friends to do the same and urge my liberal friends to vote for the Green Party.....then drink away my sorrows that night when the realization sets in that we've been sentenced to another four years of this horse****, regardless of who wins.
 
Hillary is unelectable. Period.

Sounds good on paper, except for one thing:

When was the last time someone named Clinton lost an election?

Tick-tick-tick-tick . . .
 
Bobby Clinton lost the first grade milk monitor position last fall at Jones Elementary School.
You ask, we answer.
 
I'm a winner, too, beeyotches!

240x240_dewitt.jpg
 
I'm just waiting for the dirt to come out on Thompson. He's a Hollywood type, there's got to be something dark and dirty in his past...
 
Fenian_Bastard said:
Mizzougrad96 said:
Oz said:
Well, if Rudy wins, we know it won't be because he's playing up family values.

The last time anyone said that, we got Clinton...

Yeah, and those were eight years of nightmarish peace and prosperity.
There is not a single ****-up, authoritarian measure, or extraconstitutional step that this government has taken over the past seven years that every major GOP candidate doesn't also support -- pace Ron Paul -- so, since I think most of that stuff is downright unAmerican, I'll take anyone from Couln B please.

That wasn't a knock at Bill Clinton, I was just pointing out that Giuliani would hardly be the first candidate with a questionable personal life to be elected...
 
I've voted for a third-party candidate in every presidential race since I became eligible. Right now, Richardson is the only major-party candidate for whom I'd consider changing that stance.

[obligatory Simpsons response goes here]
 
TrooperBari said:
I've voted for a third-party candidate in every presidential race since I became eligible. Right now, Richardson is the only major-party candidate for whom I'd consider changing that stance.

[obligatory Simpsons response goes here]

He's moving a little in NH this week.
 
BTExpress said:
Hillary is unelectable. Period.

Sounds good on paper, except for one thing:

When was the last time someone named Clinton lost an election?

Tick-tick-tick-tick . . .

In the early 1980s when Bill ran for attorney general of Arkansas...
 
Giuliani vs. Hillary -- Giuliani
Thompson vs. Hillary -- Third party
McCain vs. Hillary -- McCain
Romney vs. Hillary -- Third party

Giuliani vs. Edwards -- Edwards
Thompson vs. Edwards -- Edwards
McCain vs. Edwards -- McCain
Romney vs. Edwards -- Edwards

Giuliani vs. Obama -- Obama
Thompson vs. Obama -- Obama
McCain vs. Obama -- Obama
Romney vs. Obama -- Obama
 
Mizzougrad96 said:
Giuliani vs. Hillary -- Giuliani
Thompson vs. Hillary -- Thompson
McCain vs. Hillary -- McCain
Romney vs. Hillary -- Romney

Giuliani vs. Edwards -- Giuliani
Thompson vs. Edwards -- Edwards
McCain vs. Edwards -- McCain
Romney vs. Edwards -- Romney

Giuliani vs. Obama -- Giuliani
Thompson vs. Obama -- Obama
McCain vs. Obama -- McCain
Romney vs. Obama -- Romney

Don't quote Bill Hicks if you're going to vote this way ... sad and wrong, sir, wrong.
 
Giuliani vs. Hillary -- Ron Paul
Thompson vs. Hillary -- Thompson
McCain vs. Hillary -- McCain
Romney vs. Hillary -- Ron Paul

Giuliani vs. Edwards -- Edwards
Thompson vs. Edwards -- Edwards
McCain vs. Edwards -- McCain
Romney vs. Edwards -- Edwards

Giuliani vs. Obama -- Obama
Thompson vs. Obama -- Thompson
McCain vs. Obama -- McCain
Romney vs. Obama -- Obama
 

Latest posts

Back
Top