When Tiger(s) Attack

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

buckweaver

Active Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2005
Messages
18,033
<NO1>BC-Tiger Escapes,0203<QA>
<NO>URGENT<QA>
Tiger escapes cage at San Francisco Zoo, killing 1 and injuring 2<QA>
Eds: Stands for BC-Tigers Escape; CORRECTS that just 1 tiger escaped and updates throughout.<QA>
SAN FRANCISCO <NO1>(AP)<NO>— A tiger escaped its cage at the San Francisco Zoo on Tuesday, killing one person and injuring
two others, a newspaper reported.<QA>
The tiger was shot, San Francisco Fire Department spokesman Lt. Ken Smith told the San Francisco Chronicle. It was not
immediately clear how the tiger escaped.<QA>
The zoo, which had been scheduled to close at 5 p.m. PST, was evacuated.<QA>
It was unclear whether the victim was a visitor or a zoo worker.<QA>
Police officers and firefighters are investigating.<QA>
Officials at first worried that four tigers had escaped, but only one escaped its pen, Smith said.<QA>
Last December, one of the zoo’s tigers mauled a zookeeper during a regular public feeding. The 350-pound animal reached
through the cage’s iron bars and badly lacerated her arm. The zoo’s Lion House was temporarily closed during an
investigation.<NO1><QL>
AP-WS-12-25-07 2150EST <NO>

EDIT: Never mind. Just one tiger.

Here's the S.F. Chron story: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/12/25/BA0LU4M2T.DTL&tsp=1
 
Imagine being one of the two who were injured but not killed? Now THAT's a helluva story to tell people. If you can't get laid after telling your story of survival after getting mauled by an 800-pound tiger, well, you've problems. :)
 
TheSportsPredictor said:
An escaped tiger kills a zoo patron in a cafe

Wow, who would expect their day to end that way?

Or their life ...
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
How long until a lawsuit is filed?

There had to be negligence of some sort for this animal to escape into a common area.
 
wicked said:
How long until a lawsuit is filed?

There had to be negligence of some sort for this animal to escape into a common area.

Not only that, but she was still on display after having attacked a keeper last year.
 
wicked said:
How long until a lawsuit is filed?

There had to be negligence of some sort for this animal to escape into a common area.

As soon as the offices open tomorrow, I'm guessing.
 
mike311gd said:
wicked said:
How long until a lawsuit is filed?

There had to be negligence of some sort for this animal to escape into a common area.

As soon as the offices open tomorrow, I'm guessing.

Nah, the attorney needs to accrue some billable hours first ... what do you think this is - McLawsuit?
 
Write-brained said:
mike311gd said:
wicked said:
How long until a lawsuit is filed?

There had to be negligence of some sort for this animal to escape into a common area.

As soon as the offices open tomorrow, I'm guessing.

Nah, the attorney needs to accrue some billable hours first ... what do you think this is - McLawsuit?

lionelhutz.jpg


Close.
 
I'm all of a sudden feeling antsy about my 2 o'clock with a bengal tomorrow ...
 
sportschick said:
wicked said:
How long until a lawsuit is filed?

There had to be negligence of some sort for this animal to escape into a common area.

Not only that, but she was still on display after having attacked a keeper last year.

Chronicle story said the state has already found the zoo was at fault for that attack because of the way the cage was configured. This is gonna get ugly.
 
buckweaver said:
sportschick said:
wicked said:
How long until a lawsuit is filed?

There had to be negligence of some sort for this animal to escape into a common area.

Not only that, but she was still on display after having attacked a keeper last year.

Chronicle story said the state has already found the zoo was at fault for that attack because of the way the cage was configured. This is gonna get ugly.

And it deserves to get ugly. No one had to die.

Die. On Christmas. At a zoo.

Christ.
 
Rumpleforeskin said:
Write-brained said:
I'm all of a sudden feeling antsy about my 2 o'clock with a bengal tomorrow ...

What do you have to worry about, it's just Chris Henry.
Do you think the tiger said, "Don't you know who I am?" before the attack?
 
wicked said:
buckweaver said:
sportschick said:
wicked said:
How long until a lawsuit is filed?

There had to be negligence of some sort for this animal to escape into a common area.

Not only that, but she was still on display after having attacked a keeper last year.

Chronicle story said the state has already found the zoo was at fault for that attack because of the way the cage was configured. This is gonna get ugly.

And it deserves to get ugly. No one had to die.

Die. On Christmas. At a zoo.

Christ.

Agreed. Human and tiger both.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top